Posted on 05/17/2008 3:07:39 PM PDT by kellynla
Q uestion: Is the U.S. quickly running out of oil?
Answer: Not really. The U.S. possesses enormous oil reserves. It prefers, for environmental reasons, not to market them. Peter Robertson, vice-chairman of Chevron, told U.S. columnist Cal Thomas the other day that the U.S. has plenty of oil but noted: Eighty-five per cent of [U.S.] offshore oil is off limits. This, despite the fact that advanced technology for offshore drilling ensures little environmental risk: During hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Mr. Robertson said, more than 1,000 offshore wells were destroyed [in the Gulf of Mexico] but not one of them leaked. The U.S. has 30 billion barrels of proved reserves and another 112 billion barrels unproved but deemed recoverable enough to run the U.S. economy for decades. Further, it has supplementary fossil fuel resources (coal and shale) almost beyond calculation enough to run the U.S. economy for centuries. Ironically, the U.S. no-drilling policy ensures that the U.S. will ultimately and inadvertently possess the largest strategic crude oil reserve in the world.
Well, the world is quickly running out of oil, right?
Not really. The U.S. Energy Information Administration calculates that the world's proven reserves of oil will last for 50 years at current rates of production but notes that proven reserves are still increasing year over year as they have for more than 25 years. In the early 1980s, the world's proven reserves would have lasted for only 30 years at the 1980s rate of production.
Surely you will concede that the big multinational oil companies are global oligopolists engaged in a criminal conspiracy to rip off the people of the world?
Not really. Look at the oil reserves that the nine biggest oil companies control. Add them up. There's Exxon Mobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Occidental from the U.S. There's BP from Britain and Total from France. There's Shell from Holland and Statoil from Norway. There's Eni from Italy. Together, they control only 4 per cent of the world's oil reserves. Incidentally, the people who own Big Oil are mostly regular folk. Corporate insiders own 1 per cent of the shares; and big institutional investors own 5 per cent. Mutual funds own 30 per cent; pension funds own 27 per cent; individuals own 37 per cent with most of the shares held in retirement accounts.
Surely you will concede, though, that the Big Oil companies routinely fix prices at the pump?
Not really. In a literal sense, many prices are fixed. Someone fixes the fee that hospitals charge for beds. Someone fixes the price of milk, eggs and butter. But there is far more intense competition between oil companies than there is between public hospitals or between dairy farmers. Gas companies are uniquely competitive and motorists are uniquely competitive. The shopping experience for gas is far more intense than for other goods. It is almost athletic. Many people will drive across town speed across town to save a penny a litre. The higher the price, the more competitive the market. This is why oil companies are reporting declines in earnings this year even though pump prices have never been higher.
But surely you will concede that the oil companies have made off like bandits in the past couple of years.
Not really. Oil companies fared well in 2005 and 2006, at the height of the business cycle a period when all businesses fared well. In the U.S., the oil companies earned a return on investment of 22.5 per cent in 2005 compared with a return of 21.0 per cent for the S&P industrials. But they had earned a return of only 9.9 per cent a year, on average, during the past 25 years when the S&P industrials earned 12.0 per cent a year. In 2001, by the way, these companies got 14.3 per cent of the pump price for distribution, marketing and margin; so far in 2008, they are getting 9.2 per cent.
Whatever. Most people still think the government should do something.
Precisely. Here at home, the federal government alone collects an extra $100-million in windfall revenue from every 10-cent increase in gas prices. As the Canadian Taxpayers Federation observed earlier this week, in observance of its Gas Tax Honesty Day, one of the biggest costs in filling our tanks is the cost of government. Taxes account for 28 per cent of pump prices. Strip out the taxes (32.6 cents a litre) and you get back to the real price of gas: 86 cents a litre. All by itself, this honest-to-God price proves that there's no scarcity of oil. Which is obvious when you think about it. When anywhere in the world have we ever run out of gas?
ping
—bflr—
Bump!
Bump!
>Incidentally, the people who own Big Oil are mostly regular folk.<
Speculators maybe?
I was listening to the radio the other day. It might have been Savage’s show. I don’t remember. There was a guy talking about how some of the big money folks invested in both real estate and oil. They lost a bunch of money on real estate, so they want to recoup losses by driving up the price of oil.
Made sense to me.
I get it that most investors are not individuals.
But who decides where to put the money in a pension fund, or a mutual fund?
I know absolutely nothing about the stock market and investments. I have no idea exactly where my 401K money is invested and who made that decision.
I do know this decision is probably made by a portfolio manager who would likely be managing a vast amount of money. The portfolio manager is making the decision for the millions of regular folks who chose that particular mutual fund.
It simply supply and demand. It utterly amazing to watch how the same Democrat Senators who last week were screaming how we “could not drill our way out of this problem” this week are patting themselves on the back for “forcing OPEC to increase production.” So apparently in the wacko world of Democrats production WILL solve the problem but only so long as it is production that other countries then the USA will profit from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply_and_demand
As for the annual gas price spike, in May the State and Federal EPAS impose their Summer Blends enviormental rules. Those same rules go off Sept 15th. Every spring we have a price jump because just as demand starts to go up for the summer driving season we put an artificial kink in the supply chain by demanding 93 separate types of gas be produced.
High Demand-restricted supply equals price spike. Simple Econ.
It has nothing to do with evil speculators or “Big Oil” or any of the other pseudo populist nonsense spewed by the talking heads on your TV and your radio, it has to do with stupid byzantine US and State EPA regulations along with 30 years of Govt policy that pushed “conservation not consumption”.
inadvertently? --- BS!
This is by design.
> It has nothing to do with evil speculators or Big Oil or any of the other pseudo populist nonsense spewed by the talking heads on your TV and your radio, it has to do with stupid byzantine US and State EPA regulations along with 30 years of Govt policy that pushed conservation not consumption.<
I don’t believe everything I’m told by the media or I wouldn’t be here.
I’ve always felt like enviroweenies and EPA regs were the true culprits. Still, what I heard the guest speaker discuss kind of made sense to me.
Just like my idea that government could use oil issues as a means of controlling the population.
But my mind wanders...
There is also supply and and ever increasing demand from countries like India and China.
I never bought into the “big oil is evil” BS.
>So apparently in the wacko world of Democrats production WILL solve the problem but only so long as it is production that other countries then the USA will profit from<
That is maddening, isn’t it?
different day same drum!!!
“$58 per barrel when the Dims took over Congress, $126 per barrel less than 18 months later” bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.