Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NARAL Chooses Obama
newsmax.com ^ | May 16, 2008 | Susan Estrich

Posted on 05/16/2008 4:50:34 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: FormerACLUmember
Obama supports the core values of the democrat party: the vast slaughter of defenseless babies

After years of sorting through the craziness of politics, I came up with three simple rules to help rank candidates:

(1) How they line up on the unborn child;

(2) How they line up on the Nation of Israel; and

(3) How they line up on the Lord Jesus Christ.

This is not a perfect measure, but in the long run, I have come to see that when they measure up well on these major issues for me, they seem to do well on many of the minors also.

21 posted on 05/16/2008 6:13:59 PM PDT by Dustoff45 (A non-posting Freeper produces far fewer spelling errors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Dear Susan Ostrich,

Permit me to explain this to you. It’s really simple. Have you ever heard of something called “shameless opportunism”??? That’s all it is. NARAL leadership waited until it was clear who the ‘Rat nominee will be and then jumped on board the bandwagon. It costs them nothing. As you note, even Shrillary will still want to “stand tall” for them in the future. All they want to do is to try to ensure some extra access to a potential Obama WH, and there was really nothing for them to lose.

That makes it a “no-brainer”


22 posted on 05/16/2008 10:08:20 PM PDT by Enchante (Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Obama! He’s the baby-killingest!!!


23 posted on 05/16/2008 10:47:59 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Actually, I can see NARAL'S thinking to support BO over Hillary. Granted, it's a sick kind of thinking, but I think I do understand why they are supporting BO. It's a business decision. Plus, it takes the heat off white Democrat pro-abortion politicians and lobbyists.

It's craven, but then.. there it is.

24 posted on 05/17/2008 4:59:56 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson