Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Whereas, Obama's policies would come down on Iran and Hamas like a sledgehammer of U.S. military power.
1 posted on 05/16/2008 12:13:37 PM PDT by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cinnamon Girl

“Responding to Bush’s comment on Thursday that those who want to talk to Iran were like Nazi appeasers before the Second World War, Obama accused Bush of “exactly the kind of appalling attack that’s divided the country and that alienates us from the world.”

Yes, so alienated that coalitions of countries are currently helping us defeat these militant animals in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This guy is a loon.


2 posted on 05/16/2008 12:19:23 PM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
This guy is an absolute idiot, or an absolute quisling. My vote is on the latter.

There are 50 million people in Iraq and Afghanistan who differ with Obama...they are free to do so nowq because of Bush.

There has not been a major terror attack on our soil since 911, because of Bush and taking the fight to the enemy on their turf.

...and in the process, Iran, who is the chief sponsor of terror, is surrounded by our forces now, who are ready to attack should we need to.

Obama would have the world still living with Saddam Hussein, and an inabaility for us to respond to either him or Iran...and he calls that world safer.

I pray the American people will have the wisdom to see the difference.


BARACK HUSSEIN CHAMBERLAIN

3 posted on 05/16/2008 12:22:22 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl

It will be interesting how the man that wants to “talk with Iran” spins himself out of this?

So far they have managed to spin nearly every weakness into a strength and define sore or weak issues as off limits. For example: the fact that he’s inexperienced is spun into the idea that he isn’t part of the establishment and a new flavor in politics. His own wife’s words, his middle name, his attendance in a school that’s largely Muslim, all those themes are “taboo” and will label anyone mentioning them as mean spirited, racist, or xenophobic.

Obama is all form, no function. Like Global Warming, a theme he gladly beats on the campaign trail, his entire political platform and persona is itself a giant facade of Styrofoam and papier-mâché.


4 posted on 05/16/2008 12:23:20 PM PDT by Red6 (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
***”That's the Bush-McCain record on protecting this country,”***

Hey Obama, we haven't been attacked on our own soil since 9/11 so prove we're less safe.

5 posted on 05/16/2008 12:32:11 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl; Jeff Head
I saw this picture on another thread - I think it fits:


6 posted on 05/16/2008 12:32:49 PM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (Hillary, Obama, McCain. Curley, Larry, Moe. Decisions, decisions,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl

Whoa! Obama needs to seriously get laid or something.

What a little baby, freak-out tantrum this is.

Chill, dude!


7 posted on 05/16/2008 12:34:26 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
***”They're going to have to explain why Hamas now controls Gaza, Hamas that was strengthened because the United States insisted that we should have democratic elections in the Palestinian Authority.”***

Hey Obama, isn't this what spreading Democracy is about, giving the voice to the people?

8 posted on 05/16/2008 12:34:49 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
So let's see, Obama is declining to unilaterally overturn the policy that's been officially agreed on not only by the Bush administration, but also by the Middle East “Quartet” (the EU, the UN, and Russia)?
Will the idiot press ask him that question? Did he support the this policy in the first place, so he now disagrees with the EU, UN, and Russia?

So will he now be called a “COWBOY” by the MSM and governments worldwide?

9 posted on 05/16/2008 12:36:28 PM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl

10 posted on 05/16/2008 12:38:06 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
***”They've got to answer for the fact that Iran is the greatest strategic beneficiary of our invasion of Iraq. It made Iran stronger, George Bush's policies,”***

Hey Obama, wasn't Iraq a majority Shiite before we invaded and isn't Iran a majority Shiite? Won't there naturally be a strengthening religious ties between the two countries if a brutal dictator is removed?

12 posted on 05/16/2008 12:38:53 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
"Those are the failed policies that John McCain wants to double down on."

Is Barack Obama a big time gambler also? I don't know anyone who uses those words.

14 posted on 05/16/2008 12:45:31 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Barak Hussein Muhammad Obamalamadingdong says that Bush kicking muzzie ass is helping Iran.

Yeah, got it.

and you're gonna do what? Talk them to death. sweet.... the Neville Chamberlain of the UFC.. what a little scrapper the young marxist from Chicago is.

16 posted on 05/16/2008 12:59:54 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl

“It’s conceivable that there are those in the Arab world who say to themselves, ‘This is a guy who spent some time in the Muslim world, has a middle name of Hussein and appears more worldly and has called for talks with people, and so he’s not going to be engaging in the same sort of cowboy diplomacy as George Bush,’” Obama said in an interview with The Atlantic.


18 posted on 05/16/2008 1:06:08 PM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Obama and the democrats are complaining that Bush should not get involved in the presidential race. However, if Obama keeps trashing Bush, I think it is fair game for Bush to strike back with anything he wants to try to damage Obama. The democrats want to be able to trash Bush and keep Bush from responding. Bush should go to full assault mode on Obama and rip him a new one.
22 posted on 05/16/2008 1:50:31 PM PDT by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
" Whereas, Obama's policies would come down on Iran and Hamas like a sledgehammer of U.S. military power."


23 posted on 05/16/2008 2:00:25 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon Girl
"If George Bush and John McCain want to have a debate about protecting the United States of America, that is a debate that I'm happy to have any time, any place, and that is a debate that I will win because George Bush and John McCain have a lot to answer for,"

Hey Dumbo!!!! Lookie here!

1) During the Bush Administration Libya gives up its nuclear weapons program.

2) During the Bush Administration the black market from Pakistan led by A.Q.Kahn for nuclear weapons technology is broken up.

3) During the Bush Administration North Korea begins dismantling their plutonium enrichment reactors.

4) During the Bush Administration Israel and the U.S.A. destroy Syria's nuclear weapons enrichment reactors.

5) During the Bush Administration, Saddam Hussein who said quite clearly while in jail awaiting his trial that he would have had the U.N. sanctions broken and be in full production of WMDs within a year. That would be the years 2004 - 2005 approximately that Saddam would have been re-armed with WMDs. It now goes without saying the obvious that Saddam will not be getting nuclear weapons anytime soon. Nor will he be directly funding and training the terror group 'Islamic Jihad' which is al-Qaeda and whom blew up two U.S. embassies. (see the recent: Iraqi Perspectives Project).

6) During the Bush Administration the U.S.A. has nuclear weapon ambitious Iran pinned in on both sides from Afghanistan and Iraq which is pure strategic genius.

Under Clinton the countries Pakistan and India successfully test nuclear weapons and North Korea begins plutonium enrichment.

25 posted on 05/16/2008 2:02:43 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson