Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant

Think the polygamists are feeling left out of this wildly widening definition of marriage?


2 posted on 05/16/2008 11:39:16 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slapshot68

Libs try to dismiss your argument as a false “slippery slope” argument.

It is in no way a slope, or a continuum, of acceptable arrangements.

There is traditional marriage, defined by God from the very beginning of the human race, then there is everything else.

Once THE definition is compromised, no logical argument can be made for another definition that excludes ANYTHING.


17 posted on 05/16/2008 11:49:45 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Slapshot68
I have got this horse and ....... Oh, whatever.
34 posted on 05/16/2008 12:11:18 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (LayteGulf BeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson