Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama accuses Bush of 'appalling attack'
Breitbart.com ^ | May.16, 2008 | AP

Posted on 05/16/2008 9:52:25 AM PDT by Reagan Man

WATERTOWN, S.D. (AP) - Barack Obama has called President Bush's comments on appeasement "exactly the kind of appalling attack that's divided our country and alienates us from the rest of the world." Obama criticized Republican rival John McCain and President Bush for "dishonest and divisive" attacks in hinting that the Democratic presidential candidate would appease terrorists.

Obama strongly responded Friday to the comments Bush made in Israel on Thursday and McCain's subsequent words. Obama told a town hall meeting, "That's the kind of hypocrisy that we've been seeing in our foreign policy, the kind of fear-peddling, fear mongering that has prevented us from actually making us safer."

Obama said McCain had a "naive and irresponsible belief that tough talk from Washington will somehow cause Iran to give up it's nuclear program and support for terrorism."

Yesterday, Obama accused President Bush of "a false political attack" after Bush warned in Israel against appeasing terrorists—early salvos in a general election campaign that's already blazing even as the Democratic front-runner tries to sew up his party's nomination.

The White House denied Bush had targeted Obama, who said the Republican commander in chief's intent was obvious.

In short order, the controversy spilled across the presidential campaign.

John McCain, the Republican nominee in waiting, said Obama was showing "naivete and inexperience and lack of judgment" in his willingness to meet with U.S. foes.

Hillary Rodham Clinton then called Bush's original comments "offensive and outrageous, especially in light of his failures in foreign policy."

As the workday began stateside, Bush gave a speech to Israel's Knesset in which he spoke of the president of Iran, who has called for the destruction of the U.S. ally. Then, the president said: "Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along."

"We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is—the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history," Bush added.

With the president abroad and those seeking to succeed him campaigning at home, the transcontinental tiff signaled the early direction of the general election. Bush seemed to assume the traditional lame-duck presidential role in trying to help the Republican nominee-in-waiting, and Obama tried to maneuver for advantage—and to show strength—while on the cusp of clinching the Democratic nomination.

McCain played his political role as well in tandem with Obama, notable for two White House hopefuls who are campaigning for a bipartisan governing approach free of the often divisive discourse in Washington.

By tradition, partisan politics comes to a halt when a U.S. president is on foreign soil, and Bush's remarks led Obama to quickly cry foul. The first-term Illinois senator responded to the comments as if they were criticism of his position that as president he would be willing to personally meet with Iran's leaders and those of other regimes the United States has deemed rogue.

"It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack," Obama said in a statement his aides distributed. "George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel.

In turn, White House press secretary Dana Perino denied that the Knesset remark was aimed at Obama. In fact, the language is fairly typical for Bush speeches, and Gordon Johndroe, a national security spokesman for the president, said Bush was referring to "a wide range of people who have talked to or suggested we talk to Hamas, Hezbollah or their state sponsors" over a long period of time.

One such person most recently was former President Carter, who held talks with Hamas leaders, leading to criticism from Bush officials as well as Obama and McCain.

Even as the White House said Bush meant no dig at the Democrat, Perino couldn't resist the opportunity to get in a small one.

"I understand when you're running for office you sometimes think the world revolves around you. That is not always true. And it is not true in this case," she said.

Meanwhile, in Columbus, Ohio, McCain said he took the White House at its word, but then he weighed into the spat himself, saying: "This does bring up an issue that we will be discussing with the American people, and that is, why does Barack Obama, Senator Obama, want to sit down with a state sponsor of terrorism?"

Asked if Obama was an appeaser, McCain said Obama must explain why he wants to talk with leaders like Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and added that Obama's position was a serious error. "It shows naivete and inexperience and lack of judgment to say that he wants to sit down across the table from an individual who leads a country that says Israel is a stinking corpse, that is dedicated to the extinction of the state of Israel. My question is, what does he want to talk about?"

Clinton, campaigning in South Dakota in advance of a June 3 Democratic primary, said Bush's statement had "no place in any presidential address. ...

"I have differences with Senator Obama on certain foreign policy matters, but I think we are united in our opposition to the Bush policies and to the continuation of those policies by Senator McCain." Clinton has criticized Obama in the past for his pledge to meet with prominent adversaries of the United States without precondition.

Although his political interest is keen, Bush has mostly tried to refrain from injecting himself into the presidential race.

He largely remained silent during the Republican primaries but appeared with McCain at the White House after the Arizona senator clinched the nomination and, since then, has talked up McCain frequently. As for the Democratic race, the president typically avoids naming names, but he has publicly disagreed with the positions of the Democratic front-runners, including Obama's expressed willingness to meet leaders of U.S. adversaries.

The debate over whether a president should directly negotiate with such leaders has been one of the most prominent issue differences in the race for the Democratic nomination. Obama has said he would be willing to meet with heads of state in places like Iran, Cuba and North Korea. Democratic rival Hillary Rodham Clinton has argued that those meetings could be used for propaganda and her first response would be outreach through diplomatic channels.

By criticizing Bush, Obama sent a signal that he's ready to take on the sitting president and the incumbent party—and tried to counter the notion that Clinton would be the stronger Democratic general election candidate. Democrats also are working to link the unpopular Bush to McCain at every turn as the public craves change, and even if it wasn't directed at Obama, Bush's remark gave Democrats an opening to claim more of the same.

"It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel," Obama said in his statement. "Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what (Presidents) Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power—including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy—to pressure countries like Iran and Syria."

For their part, McCain and Republicans increasingly see Obama as their November rival and have been taking every opportunity to raise questions about his readiness to be a wartime commander in chief. The GOP also hopes to make national security—historically a Republican strength—a focus of the campaign when the political terrain favors Democrats.

Indicating what's to come, McCain said: "Peace through strength is the way we achieve peace in the world. That's the point. I will debate this issue with Senator Obama throughout this campaign."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appeasement; appeaseniks; israel; knesset; presbushknesset08; presidentbush; rmthread; speech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: Reagan Man
Obama criticized Republican rival John McCain and President Bush for "dishonest and divisive" attacks in hinting that the Democratic presidential candidate would appease terrorists.

Thus proving the saying "A skunk smells it's own stink first".

81 posted on 05/16/2008 11:09:20 AM PDT by PogySailor (We're so screwed.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

The only thing apalling is BHO.


82 posted on 05/16/2008 11:26:45 AM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Barack Obama has called President Bush’s comments on appeasement “exactly the kind of appalling attack that’s divided our country and alienates us from the rest of the world.”

Obama, the Neville Chamberlain of our times.
Winston Churchill and WWII proved that appeasing and treating with evil only gets you killed and your nation destroyed.
If this man ever becomes President of the United States, we may be looking at the first days of the end of America......
I know Clinton is a waste and McCain is not much better but Obama is truly dangerous


83 posted on 05/16/2008 11:33:59 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Patriot Guard Riders - Standing for those that stood for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Nice, but I think this is closer to what you were shooting for...


84 posted on 05/16/2008 11:34:10 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Peace Is Not The Question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man; Allegra; big'ol_freeper; Lil'freeper; TrueKnightGalahad; blackie; Larry Lucido; ...
Re: Obama accuses Bush of 'appalling attack'

Yet if nObama was President and Iran nukes Israel or New York City, we can expect the MSM anointed Messiah to say, "Hey! That's not nice, so let us talk about it."


85 posted on 05/16/2008 11:41:42 AM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
“Obama said McCain had a “naive and irresponsible belief that tough talk from Washington will somehow cause Iran to give up it's nuclear program and support for terrorism.”

This is huge... Obama is de facto either (1) surrendering to Iran a right to support terrorism, (2) dismissing any attempt (by anyone including himself) to try to change Iran by diplomacy (tough talk), or (3) indicating a position that the only way to get Iran to change is by force. I am sure he will spin it differently but his words speak for themselves.

86 posted on 05/16/2008 11:42:41 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

The guy’s a retard. The President was talking about Jimmy Carter.

I realize they are brothers from a different mother, but still...


87 posted on 05/16/2008 11:48:05 AM PDT by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Anyone want to bet on when President Bush apologizes?


88 posted on 05/16/2008 11:49:42 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Forgive me... I just could not help myself!
89 posted on 05/16/2008 12:06:25 PM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

No problem whatsoever. Excellent pic and post. Spread the word!


90 posted on 05/16/2008 12:13:18 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Obama accuses Bush of 'appalling attack'

Obama's very existence is appauling to me.

91 posted on 05/16/2008 12:18:43 PM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Hillary Rodham Clinton then called Bush's original comments "offensive and outrageous, especially in light of his failures in foreign policy."

Given the way things are now going in Iraq, and assuming that McCain is elected and properly completes America's job in Iraq, the foreign policy record of George W. Bush will be admired for centuries.

92 posted on 05/16/2008 12:18:43 PM PDT by OldNavyVet ("Peace is more than just the absence of war, true peace is justice, true peace is freedom" R Regan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Me thinks the man doth protest too much.

GWB hits a nerve, howitzer-like. My only comment is “WHERE HAS THIS GEORGE BUSH BEEN”?


93 posted on 05/16/2008 12:22:00 PM PDT by Spok (Ignorance is no excuse-it's the real thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

This episode reminds me of the old days on the farm.

The cows that got shocked by the cattle prod or the electric fence were the ones that bellowed.


94 posted on 05/16/2008 12:32:23 PM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Typical white person, bitter, religious, gun owner, who will "Just say No to BO (or HRC).")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Obama’s complaining sounds like an admission that he plans on appeasing terrorists.


95 posted on 05/16/2008 2:05:51 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson