Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM Research Unveils Breakthrough In Solar Farm Technology
www.physorg.com ^ | 05/16/2008 | Source: IBM

Posted on 05/16/2008 8:27:24 AM PDT by Red Badger

IBM researchers have achieved a breakthrough in photovoltaics technology that could significantly reduce the cost of harnessing the Sun's power for electricity. ------------------------------------------------------------------ IBM today announced a research breakthrough in photovoltaics technology that could significantly reduce the cost of harnessing the Sun's power for electricity.

By mimicking the antics of a child using a magnifying glass to burn a leaf or a camper to start a fire, IBM scientists are using a large lens to concentrate the Sun’s power, capturing a record 230 watts onto a centimeter square solar cell, in a technology known as concentrator photovoltaics, or CPV. That energy is then converted into 70 watts of usable electrical power, about five times the electrical power density generated by typical cells using CPV technology in solar farms.

Love personal electronics? Link up with the like minded at PEbuzz If it can overcome additional challenges to move this project from the lab to the fab, IBM believes it can significantly reduce the cost of a typical CPV based system. By using a much lower number of photovoltaic cells in a solar farm and concentrating more light onto each cell using larger lenses, IBM’s system enables a significant cost advantage in terms of a lesser number of total components.

For instance, by moving from a 200 sun system ("one sun" is a measurement equal to the solar power incident at noon on a clear summer day), where about 20 watts per square centimeter of power is concentrated onto the cell, to the IBM Lab results of a 2300 sun system, where approximately 230 watts per square centimeter are concentrated onto the cell system, the IBM system cuts the number of photovoltaic cells and other components by a factor of 10.

“We believe IBM can bring unique skills from our vast experience in semiconductors and nanotechnology to the important field of alternative energy research,” said Dr. Supratik Guha, the scientist leading photovoltaics activities at IBM Research. “This is one of many exploratory research projects incubating in our labs where we can drive big change for an entire industry while advancing the basic underlying science of solar cell technology."

The trick lies in IBM’s ability to cool the tiny solar cell. Concentrating the equivalent of 2000 suns on such a small area generates enough heat to melt stainless steel, something the researchers experienced first hand in their experiments. But by borrowing innovations from its own R&D in cooling computer chips, the team was able to cool the solar cell from greater than 1600 degrees Celsius to just 85 degrees Celsius.

The initial results of this project will be presented at the 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists conference today, where the IBM researchers will detail how their liquid metal cooling interface is able to transfer heat from the solar cell to a copper cooling plate much more efficiently than anything else available today.

The IBM research team developed a system that achieved breakthrough results by coupling a commercial solar cell to an advanced IBM liquid metal thermal cooling system using methods developed for the microprocessor industry.

Specifically, the IBM team used a very thin layer of a liquid metal made of a gallium and indium compound that they applied between the chip and a cooling block. Such layers, called thermal interface layers, transfer the heat from the chip to the cooling block so that the chip temperature can be kept low. The IBM liquid metal solution offers the best thermal performance available today, at low costs, and the technology was successfully developed by IBM to cool high power computer chips earlier.

While concentrator-based photovoltaics technologies have been around since the 1970s, they have received renewed interest in recent times. With very high concentrations, they have the potential to offer the lowest-cost solar electricity for large-scale power generation, provided the temperature of the cells can be kept low, and cheap and efficient optics can be developed for concentrating the light to very high levels.

IBM is exploring four main areas of photovoltaic research: using current technologies to develop cheaper and more efficient silicon solar cells, developing new solution processed thin film photovoltaic devices, concentrator photovoltaics, and future generation photovoltaic architectures based upon nanostructures such as semiconductor quantum dots and nanowires.

The goal of the projects is to develop efficient photovoltaic structures that would reduce the cost, minimize the complexity, and improve the flexibility of producing solar electric power.

In addition to the photovoltaic research announced today, IBM is focused on several areas related to energy and the environment, including energy efficient technology and services, carbon management, advanced water management, intelligent utility networks and intelligent transportation systems. With decades of leadership in environmental stewardship, proven ability to solve complex challenges and unparalleled global reach, IBM is uniquely positioned to increase the efficiency of today’s systems and enable our clients’ “green” strategies.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: electronics; energy; goemcore; solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Red Badger

Exactly what I’m thinking. Therrionics + CPV for direct electrical generation. We could even do a Quadruple combination of Thermionics + CPV using Salt Water to cool the system, which would be turned to steam, further generating electricity AND we could desalinate the salt water. Sun + Heat + Salt Water In , Electricity + fresh water out.

ENECO - Breakthrough energy conversion technique, thermal chips ...Thermionic energy conversion works in the manner shown schematically in Figure 1 ... for example a thermal diode made of silicon must have approximately 200 ...
www.eneco.com/tech_science.html


41 posted on 05/16/2008 12:10:44 PM PDT by Kevmo (SURFRINAGWIASS : Shut Up RINOs. Free Republic is not a GOP Website. ItÂ’s a SOCON Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

$5 a watt isn’t as bad as you would think....

According the the Energy Department (if you believe anything coming from the government), a new coal power plant typically costs $2.10 per Watt of capacity to construct.

Considering that the fuel is free, solar can cost more to install and pay itself back. $5 per Watt is likely still too high... but if you can get below $3 per Watt, you’re looking better....

Personally, with the amount of electricity my house consumes on average, a system that cost $2 per Watt would be VERY well worth the investment. Considering tax benefits, final cost could be as little as $4000... knocking out that electric bill at that investment cost would be equivalent to getting 23% annual return on investment...


42 posted on 05/16/2008 1:51:37 PM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Can you tell me more about the publicaly funded projects. By FReepMail if that is easier. Actually a subject of particular interest right now.


43 posted on 05/16/2008 4:16:41 PM PDT by gogov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: gogov

http://www.energy-daily.com/

Many articles all the time. You probably have this site already.


44 posted on 05/16/2008 4:24:19 PM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Very accurate, active pointing required!?


45 posted on 05/16/2008 5:11:27 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005

“Considering tax benefits, final cost could be as little as $4000..”

So it works as long as you get tax welfare ? That’s not a solution. I watched wind power companies go bankrupt ten years ago when Congress took away their tax subsidies. No industry can survive if it is dependent on the whims of Congress.

Luckily, that won’t be necessary. anosolar is producing panels at $1 per watt, and their entire production capacity is booked through 2009. It costs them 30 cents per watt ot make those cells, so they have a decent profit margin and capacity will eventually catch up with demand. Complete solar PV systems at $2 per watt are only a few years away.


46 posted on 05/18/2008 12:58:37 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (I used to be Dilbert. Then I was Wally. I retired before I became the Pointy Haired One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

“Oddly, and contrary to some opinion, the big private investors in solar cell tech are big oil.”

I wonder how much of that is just PR so they can be seen to be “doing something” about alternative energy sources?


47 posted on 05/18/2008 1:15:55 AM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789

I didn’t say it would *only* work with tax benefits....

I said that considering tax benefits it would cost very little.

Big difference.


48 posted on 05/18/2008 4:17:54 PM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson