Posted on 05/15/2008 12:59:50 PM PDT by Texican72
While no one knows who first uttered the sentiment "Its better to say nothing and seem a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt," Republican presidential hopeful John McCains speech this week on climate change certainly supports the phrases validity.
McCain spoke at the facilities of Vestas Wind Technology, an Oregon-based firm that manufactures wind-power systems. The irony of the setting was rich given McCains outspoken opposition to pork-barrel spending.
He even risked his presidential hopes by criticizing ethanol subsidies ahead of the all-important Iowa caucuses. Next to solar power, however, wind power is the most heavily subsidized form of energy.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Obama may well become the next President if enough folks refuse McCain’s rather bizarre positions. We got through four years of Carter...
...this might be the Republican’s time in the Wilderness. I trust in God, and the American people...He has us in his hands...if Obama happens, he happens. But I’m not going vote for a Kennedy-Republican. Period.
I think you're partly right -- McCain & Co. are certainly betting on conservatives holding their ankles, yet again, in some misguided belief that same-old-same-old will yield some new and different return. However, I also think Juan is a true believer in the climate hoax.
One thing's for sure, this country is in for some dark days ahead. Very dark indeed.
This guy is nuts.
Agree totally. I think this country is much closer to learning the intent of the second amendment than most people think. The graft, corruption, and brain-dead thinking from the crooked, power-hungry drones in Washington - indeed, at all levels of government - is appalling. It is beyond ones' thinking how the American people can continue to tolerate this.
Something's going to give.
He's pandering to a core group of people who have him pegged as the third term of Bush. Global warming to those people is about as near and dear to their hearts as the WOT, "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" issues and open borders are to Conservatives.
Lishen here, my friend, I don’t need you, shee, and I don’t need that Bush and I don’t need the congress either, shee... And don’t think I don’t know where you live my friend.
And this baboso is the best of the candidates in the running for the presidency?
Might make an decent greeter at Wal-Mart, maybe.
I dunno, I think that in whatever opium dream world they live in they’ve cooked the books to where they don’t think they need the conservatives. Thish ish the deshtruction of the peopple who dared shtand in my way on crimmigration, my friend.
You have no idea how many times I have thought the same thing. The more I read the political postings here and elsewhere all I can do is shake my head wonder why I keep doing this to myself.
No one thought the Soviet Union would go down, until it did. Much the same problem here -- would the military really fight against the conservatives? Or join them? Not that I'm advocating any sort of disloyalty, mind you. That wouldn't be prudent.
Ditto. McLame’s AGW garbage was the straw that broke this voter’s back, too. He is trying to mitigate the damage somewhat by pushing for more nuke energy, but I’m not buying it anymore esp. in view of is support for te cap and trade scam.
You are indeed an optimist——you only have McCain’s sort-of word that he’ll appoint non-Marxists to the Supremes. How would he get a non-Marxist by his Kennedy Buddy without hurting his buddy’s feelings?
My advice is to hold your nose when you do.
Not even Libertarian Neal Boortz is backing Barr because of Barr's stance on fighting terrorists (he's agin it).
Keep that up fella and I’ll report the abuse!! ;O)
Those trying to rationalize why one dishonorable, lying, opportunistic, self serving swine is preferable to another obviously are grasping at straws.
Any system is only as good as those controlling it. Control has been ceded to those who are basically scum.
It's a reasonable question.
IOW, assuming McCain is true to his word, and nominates an Alito or Roberts, how would such a nomination make it through the Senate?
Looking at it the other way, if (shudder) a president Obama nominates an Ayers, a Dohrn, and/or a Che groupie, a Dem Senate will confirm.
Once a Dem/Marxist Congress has a willing majority in the SCOTUS, they will have no impedance as they zip out laws confiscating property and eliminating rights, including laws that might make it impossible to ever elect a GOPer again. (Think illegal alien hordes, here.)
So, maybe the Supremes operating a few players short is a victory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.