Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Earth is warming, and we are causing it, but that is not the whole story.

IIRC, The Earth has been cooling for the last few years. Otherwise, it's not a bad discussion. You just have to separate the wheat from the occasional chaff.

1 posted on 05/14/2008 11:59:09 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem; FrPR; enough_idiocy; rdl6989; IrishCatholic; Normandy; Delacon; TenthAmendmentChampion; ..
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 05/14/2008 12:00:13 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

read later


3 posted on 05/14/2008 12:17:31 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

SAVE THE POLAR BEARS!!!!

ABOLISH HUMANITY!!!!


4 posted on 05/14/2008 12:21:57 PM PDT by Enchante (Obama: My 1930s Foreign Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Social Policy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

With the exception of his assertion that humans are causing global warming, he makes some very good points. It’s unfortunate that most politicians will not listen to him.


6 posted on 05/14/2008 12:29:14 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“women/development”?

Now there’s a pressing issue related to economics.


7 posted on 05/14/2008 12:39:04 PM PDT by dr.zaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
At first glance I was trying to figure out why an ex-tennis star was writing a book about the climate.

The again, what does Al Gore know.

8 posted on 05/14/2008 12:39:42 PM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
At first glance I was trying to figure out why an ex-tennis star was writing a book about the climate.

The again, what does Al Gore know.

9 posted on 05/14/2008 12:39:47 PM PDT by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
, every nation should commit to spending 0.05 percent of its gross domestic production exploring non-carbon-emitting energy technologies

We've already done that and have great zero-emissions technology. But the bean curd munchers don't like us building nuclear power plants.

10 posted on 05/14/2008 12:54:20 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

>IIRC, The Earth has been cooling for the last few years. Otherwise, it’s not a bad discussion.

The temperature has been pretty constant since 1999. Greenhouse gases will eventually cause warming, but there is also a lot of natural variability.

I think Lomborg has it about right.


11 posted on 05/14/2008 1:03:30 PM PDT by chipengineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
McCain could propose that the United States spends 0.05 percent of its GDP on real research and development into low-carbon energy.

Wait a minute. Is he saying government-funded? How about the $100 million in private capital the Google guys dumped into just one solar cell company? Does that .0007% GDP, 1.5% towards his proposed goal in only one transaction, even count?

12 posted on 05/14/2008 1:04:54 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I challenge the theory that any sequestration is a good idea.

All it achieves is to expensively waste CO2 and NOx waste gases instead of recycling them. It is like throwing away gasoline every time you fill up your tank, so you won’t burn it. Dumb.

Algae farms can consume a vast amount of CO2 and NOx gases, and with water and sunlight, convert them to vegetable oil, as much as 50% of the weight of the algae.

Squeeze out the vegetable oil, the mix it with alcohol and sodium hydroxide (lye) and you produce biodiesel. So simple it can be done at home.

So instead of throwing out waste gases, you convert them at pretty low cost to fuel for your truck or car.

What’s not to like?


14 posted on 05/14/2008 1:43:19 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The typical cost of cutting a ton of CO2 is about $20 right now — but we know that the damage from a ton of carbon in the atmosphere is about $2. We need to reduce the cost of cutting emissions from $20 to somewhere nearer $2.

I'd love to know how he comes up with that $2 figure.

15 posted on 05/14/2008 2:06:25 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Lonborg is a research economist not a scientist. But his expertise lies in a healthy skepticism and a willingness to follow the numbers wherever they lead.
17 posted on 05/14/2008 3:21:06 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson