Posted on 05/14/2008 9:20:18 AM PDT by PrivateIdaho
Plane's engines quit before crash
Federal Aviation Administration continues investigation
HAYDEN -- Doug Parker was talking with a friend outside his hangar at the Coeur d'Alene Airport when he called the plane going down Monday at 6:45 p.m.
"I heard it quit," Parker said Tuesday. "I knew the guy flying it and it went dead silence under full power."
Under normal conditions, there is an audible noise when a plane slows down, Parker said.
"I said 'He didn't shut that power off. He didn't abort it.' I said 'There's going to be a plane crash.' And then: boom."
Hans Petter Dyroy, 54, was certifying Hamid A Wasti, 43, who was piloting, by practicing "touch-and-go" landing techniques in Wasti's twin engine airplane, according to the sheriff's report.
"I briefly talked to Wasti and he told me he was taking off from the CDA airport when both engines stopped working," the report reads. "He attempted to restart the engines but failed. After a few seconds, Dyroy took over and again attempted to start the engines but they would not start. According to Wasti the airplane failed to gain anymore lift and they landed in the lot and crashed in the pickup truck."
full story...
(Excerpt) Read more at cdapress.com ...
The thing that concerns me is the student pilot. We don't have a whole lot of "Hamids" in the phone book around here - and even fewer taking flying lessons at the local airstrip.
“The thing that concerns me is the student pilot. We don’t have a whole lot of “Hamids” in the phone book around here - and even fewer taking flying lessons at the local airstrip. “
Good point.
Unlike certain previous flying students, however, this guy was making an effort to learn how to perform controlled landings....
My guess at the cause: water in the gas.
The US has the most inexpensive flight instruction in the world. Any airport with a flight instructor is likely to have foreign students, been this way for more than 40 years, nothing new.
I misread the headline as “Plame”, and got all hopeful...
Agreed. Happened to me when i was learning. But I found it when doing the check out.
I’m getting ready for a BFR tomorrow afternoon. I’m using an unfamiliar airplane, as mine is apart for annual inspection right now. You can be sure I’ll be doing a VERY thorough pre-flight.
Insurance actuaries & GA industry statistics have long indicated that multi-engine instruction is THE most likely scenario for serious/oft-fatal accidents...
The requirements for training the new multi-drivers in engine failure procedures [where seconds really count at low altitude)...
And engine-out operations makes the cross-play between instructor and students rife with opportunities for procedural mistakes with verrrry negative/unrecoverable consequences.
Lifting out of a touch-&-go landing is a classic opportunity for the instructor to "pull an engine" -- ideally SIMULATING failure (by leaving the engine running but setting the appropriate throttle to idle thrust)...
When I was active... All MEI's were taught to NEVER actually kill a good engine near the ground by pulling the fuel mixture to OFF... always SIMULATE with the throttle setting....
Ergo... if the student made a mistake identifying the "failed" engine... and executed eng-fail procedures on the remaining "good" engine....
...The instructor still had one good engine (idling) to salvage the situation before it deteriorated into an unrecoverable (no time/altitude remaining!)
*******************
Surmised from the witnesses quoted in the article...
"It sounded like..."
This situation sounds like the instructor MAY HAVE intentionally pulled the FUEL MIXTURE on one engine on the go/clean-up...
The student hurriedly responded and mis-identified the intentionally failed engine.... executing eng-fail procedures on the remaining good engine... which would include MISTAKENLY pulling the mixture control of the remaining GOOD ENGINE to CUT-OFF...
SAD RESULTS:
Suddenly verrrrrry quiet on-board and all around the field...
TWO OUT OF TWO engines not running...
Fresh out of working propellers....
KA-BOOM....
I am glad they didn't perish in the crash...
A SUPERIOR pilot (...by extension - a SUPERIOR flight instructor).....
...Is one who uses SUPERIOR judgment to avoid situations and scenarios where SUPERIOR flying skills might be required to save the aiarcraft and the lives on board!
Just my humble.... have a nice day!
http://www.pilot-flight-instruction.com/profile.170706.html
A twin-engine airplane crashed and hit a pickup in Kootenai County on Monday near the Kootenai Electric office close to Coeur d'Alene Airport/ Pappy Boyington Field. The Spokesman-Review (KATHY PLONKA The Spokesman-Review )
http://www.spokesmanreview.com/local/story.asp?ID=244516
Aviation ping
But this Hamid owned the aircraft.
Hans Petter Dyroy, 54, was certifying Hamid A Wasti, 43, who was piloting, by practicing "touch-and-go" landing techniques in Wasti's twin engine airplane, according to the sheriff's report.
..My guess at the cause: water in the gas.
How could that escape one of the most important, if not the most important, preflight check?
I am an instructor in Florida.
Easy ... they got lazy or distracted or had a miscommunication.
I can't speak from a piloting perspective, but in my own line of work I've seen any number of failures and mistakes caused by failure to perform some basic check. I've made a few such mistakes myself.
As I said, though, it's just a guess. There are other things that could cause a plane's engines to shut down as described ... but fuel seemed to me the most obvious candidate.
I am a new pilot with not much over 100 total hours. Even I know that full loss of power will have an effect on your climb rate in an heavy airplane.
Speaking from my perspective, that is exactly what all of our checklists are for.
There are procedures in aviation, and using a checklist is the biggest and most important one.
Paramount.
I cannot see how pumping the sumps to check the fuel could possibly not be done, especially when there is an instructor flying right seat.
It is right on every checklist ever made.
Your life depends on these rules every time that you are wheels up.
Most of them quit during a crash.
Just curious, as I know nothing of pre-flight checks..
but how do you check for water in the gas?
It's a simple device. There's a fuel outlet on the bottom of the wing. You drain a bit of fuel into one of these:
Water is heavier than avgas. If there's water in the fuel, it will settle to the bottom of the tank, by the outlet. And when you drain into the device, the water will settle to the bottom of the device.
Avgas is colored; water is not. So it's a simple and obvious process.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.