Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/13/2008 9:34:55 PM PDT by Lesforlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lesforlife
Expect the Left to fight this with a bankroll of money because it clashes with leftist abortion on demand dogma.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

2 posted on 05/13/2008 9:37:16 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org

Civil rights for the preborn *PING*


3 posted on 05/13/2008 9:42:39 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (McCain on the WOT: close Gitmo; don't drill ANWR; open borders and amnesty... no thanks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lesforlife

>that would allow voters to extend the U.S. Constitution’s protections to those who haven’t been born yet, something supporters say the U.S. founders intended all along.

This is simply miscommunication.
They are defining “people” in a manner that may allow the law to protect the unborn “people.”

I suspect that it will not pass SCOTUS muster, but I sure hope that I am wrong.


4 posted on 05/13/2008 9:46:34 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lesforlife

Doesn’t it require 176,000 signatures to make the ballot?


5 posted on 05/13/2008 9:47:37 PM PDT by DaveyB (Land of the taxed and home of the slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lesforlife

I congratulate my fellow 130,999 Coloradans who signed the petition to stop the killings.

50 million dead from abortion on demand -— enough already.


6 posted on 05/13/2008 10:22:58 PM PDT by Reagan Man (McCain Wants My Conservative Vote --- EARN IT or NO DEAL !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lesforlife

Great idea.

I am sure pregnant Illegal Aliens in Colorado will appreciate that their yet to be born babies have been granted Constitutional Protections.


9 posted on 05/13/2008 10:38:10 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lesforlife
I do not support abortion, I argue against it (and against Roe v. Wade) with anyone who will listen, and I have contributed substantially from my own meager earnings to help young women make the choice to bear and raise, rather than kill, an unexpected baby.

But I question one of the key statements in this article:

> ... extend the U.S. Constitution's protections to those who haven't been born yet, something supporters say the U.S. founders intended all along...
Does anyone, the author, the 130K Coloradans, Ms. Burton, yourself, anyone, have any actual written evidence from the Founders (documents, letters, etc.) to support this curious contention that the Founders intended to, but somehow "forgot" to, include Constitutional protection of the unborn?

The Founders wrote voluminously on all matter of topics regarding the Constitution of the new Nation, and argued vociferously on all points concerning the proper role of the new Government they were creating. Reading the documents and letters from that period is a huge undertaking, one I recommend to all freedom-loving Americans. It's inspiring stuff. They thought of, and discussed, just about everything.

So I find it hard to believe that they would have left something so important out, if they "intended all along" to include it. So my own belief is that they in fact did not want the Government interfering in people's personal decisions at that level. But that's my own belief, others believe otherwise.

Nevertheless, I'm sure someone of these folks has links to specific statements in the Founders' writings which support their contention. Please post them. Thanks.

13 posted on 05/13/2008 10:50:13 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lesforlife
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Looks pretty plain to me.

14 posted on 05/13/2008 10:55:47 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lesforlife

It amazes me as a modern society we still allow abortion to take place. You will never hear this on TV, but during many abortions the “fetus” actually pulls away and trys to avoid the doctors needles or blade. This sign in a patient in a coma would be very good news and indicate some level of high brain function.


17 posted on 05/13/2008 11:47:08 PM PDT by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson