Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OPEN FORUM: Arnold must wield the knife
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 5/12/8 | Elizabeth Karasmeighan

Posted on 05/12/2008 12:29:52 PM PDT by SmithL

This week, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger will release a revised budget proposal to rein in spending and set California on firm financial ground. As in the economic slowdown earlier this decade, state revenue growth has slowed. California is once again the poster child for poor fiscal management, and legislators in other states should watch it and learn. With an estimated gap between proposed spending and revenues of up to $20 billion, it's going to take more than Schwarzenegger's proposals to tax property insurance and close tax loopholes to fix the state budget.

Each new cut in spending will likely bring a new constituency to picket the governor's mansion, but Schwarzenegger rode into office on a pledge to reduce waste, and he should push not only for a 10 percent across-the-board cut in general spending, but also to eliminate specific programs and vacant public employee positions. California could start closing the gap by selling an estimated $1 billion in surplus state property, including the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum.

The governor should return the state government to its core functions by abolishing the Department of Conservation, cutting environmental protection spending, and diverting the special funds from those programs to the general fund ($2.5 billion). He could also eliminate spending for many small projects that litter the budget, such as the California Science Center ($20 million) and the New Deal-style Conservation Corps ($41 million).

In the last few years, California's general fund budget has grown by over 30 percent - faster than personal income, and certainly faster than revenue growth. California general fund spending rose 32 percent from the 2004 to 2008 fiscal years, peaking at more than $103 billion. But total state spending, which includes general and special funds, rose even faster. According to the governor's budget summary, total state spending rose...

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: blowingupboxes; budget; calbudget; cuts; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Elizabeth Karasmeighan is a budget policy analyst at the Cato Institute.
1 posted on 05/12/2008 12:29:52 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; calcowgirl; kellynla; SierraWasp
Schwarzenegger has repeatedly called for spending restraint, then compromised the second he was prodded by legislators. This year, he has another chance to push for action
...and another chance to capitulate.
2 posted on 05/12/2008 12:32:55 PM PDT by SmithL (Reject Obama's Half-Vast Wright-Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Maybe he could ask OJ for some advice about wielding knives in California.
Arnold sure is a girly man in that regard...


3 posted on 05/12/2008 12:33:39 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Arnold must wield the knife

"It vass easieah in dah moofees."

4 posted on 05/12/2008 12:38:38 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Offshore oil leasing. Tollroads instead of freeways.


5 posted on 05/12/2008 12:40:06 PM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Schwarzenegger's proposals to tax property insurance...

I hadn't heard that one before.

Is this his Warren Buffet inspired revision?

Next he'll be going after Prop 13.

6 posted on 05/12/2008 12:43:19 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
California lawmakers are going to face ugly choices in the coming months. Their troubles should be a lesson to legislators in other states. It's time to rein in spending.

Since Arnold and the moonbat legislators enacted this abomination, nothing will be done to solve it. Taxation and idiocy marches on.

7 posted on 05/12/2008 12:44:05 PM PDT by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Offshore oil leasing. Tollroads instead of freeways.

Offshore oil leasing, yes. Tollroads, Wrong. Tollroads would just be charging more for things we already pay taxes for.

Cut out the things government should not be doing. Stem cell research, government baby-sitting, greenhouse gas monitoring, etc. Quit spending taxpayer dollars to buy up hundreds of thousands of acres of land--Put land back in the hands of citizens and quit funding "conservancies." Cut the salaries of those who he just gave 50% increases to.

The suggestion that the solution lies in increasing revenue is the liberal dream come true.

8 posted on 05/12/2008 12:51:02 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

The mega-dollars quietly being funneled to illegals through the various ‘authorities’ is a major, unspoken reason why there is such a budget short-fall. I’m amazed this stuff can continue unopposed and unexposed.


9 posted on 05/12/2008 12:55:03 PM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Lease the roads and the schools. Let users pay the fees.


10 posted on 05/12/2008 12:55:13 PM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; Ernest_at_the_Beach
What I can't understand is how states like TX & FL can and have operated without a state income tax while CA is buried in debt WITH a state income tax?

And last I checked, TX & FL's sales & property taxes were comparable to CA...

Just two years ago there was a THREE AND A HALF BILLION DOLLAR SURPLUS in the treasury?

Who's minding the store in Sacramento? Larry, Moe & Curley? LOL

And as far as Schwarzenegger is concerned; the only thing I want to hear about him is an impending recall!

11 posted on 05/12/2008 1:04:51 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Users already pay a fee for their use. It is called a gas tax, a property tax, an income tax, etc.

Leasing roads, schools, jails, etc. to the politicians favored group is fine if ya want to support the fascist model. I don't--and I don't favor any partnerships between Government and business.

If it is the role of government, then let them perform it. If it is not (e.g. government babysitting) then get the heck out and let the private sector provide those services for whatever price the market will bear.

12 posted on 05/12/2008 1:07:23 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Offshore oil leasing. Tollroads instead of freeways.

There's only one way to return to fiscal sanity in this state... cut the budget of the organized crime syndicate otherwise known as the California Dept of Education.

13 posted on 05/12/2008 1:11:12 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
To avoid panicking the public, Arnold is not revealing that soon after the start of the last fiscal year the California budget became self-aware. The puny technology of our time is no longer sufficient to restrain it.

Scientists at Caltech are now working on a time travel device that will, it all goes well, bring in accountants from the future to send in against Sacramento.

14 posted on 05/12/2008 1:31:10 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Fine. Shut down the schools. Government shouldn’t be running schools anyway.


15 posted on 05/12/2008 1:31:56 PM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Close the schools. What do they do anyway?


16 posted on 05/12/2008 1:33:03 PM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What they DO do is suck up nearly half the state budget. No real reform is possible without Calif Dept of Edu giving up a significant amount of their ill-gotten(& ill used) gains.

When you hear a godawful noise akin to a gargantuan pig squealing way up there in Alaska, you'll know Arnold succeeded in prying funds from their collective greasy fingers.

But I'm not holding my breath.

17 posted on 05/12/2008 1:38:19 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
There's only one way to return to fiscal sanity in this state... cut the budget of the organized crime syndicate otherwise known as the California Dept of Education.

The "crime syndicate" can only exist if central control is maintained at the State level or above.

I agree they need to neuter the Dept. I think they need to return responsibility to local communities (The same goes for Dept of Ed at the federal level). There is more than enough money to run schools but the only way to run them effectively is to get local community involvement.

But... leasing all the schools in so-called public private partnerships is only handing over the syndicate to a different crime family and one where local citizens are further removed from governance of the schools.

18 posted on 05/12/2008 1:42:54 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Schools are 3/4 of our local budget. But, 1/2 don’t graduate anymore. 19/20 don’t graduate from college either. This is a big change from what Alaska had 40 years ago when it ranked #1 in education with the average being 12+ years. Something is wrong with the concept, has gone wrong with the concept. Don’t know how it is in California but probably as a guess something similar.


19 posted on 05/12/2008 1:43:00 PM PDT by RightWhale (You are reading this now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I agree - I'm not in favor of any such partnership.

As far as the the Dept of Education is concerned - it has simply become a huge & well funded lobbying organization for higher taxes.

And the ironic part is they're lobbying us with our own money. They need to be stopped.

20 posted on 05/12/2008 1:51:45 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson