Libertarian ping! To be added or removed freepmail me or post a message here.
Posted on 05/12/2008 4:43:29 AM PDT by Aristotelian
While they may end federal intervention on pot clubs, look for more federal intervention on guns and conservative speech.
Who can say? Even Bush said he’d back mediical marijuana for any State that wanted it.
Of all the things in the world to worry about a few pot clubs in Kalif are near the bottom of my list. Since pot makes people lethergic most of them don’t bother to vote. Since we are talking about Than Franthithco liberals here this is a good thing.
When I start to get really overwhelmed w/ the thought of DOOM because of the way things are going in the USA politically, I read and reread this (particularly the last verse where it says he HOLDS all things together):
Colossians 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. 17He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.
No way. Obama might be as bad as Carter, but not McCain. The thing to do is to vote for McCain.
Uh huh. And how is that working out for them -- anyone bother to ask?
"Medical" pot is being sold to "patients" at higher than black market prices -- something not authorized by California law. "Doctors" are recommending pot without even seeing "patients". (Actually, it's more like validating the existing use than recommending a treatment.)
The citizens are starting to object at the number of pot "clinics" popping up -- the latest being the one at Fisherman's Wharf, a popular tourist attraction.
Californians need to re-evaluate their own situation before asking the candidates to support what looks like a failed experiment, given the rampant abuses.
Does the unknown really have to be frightening?
All three of them would be stopping the prosecution of pot clubs for exactly the wrong reasons.
I would love a president who said “The marijuana is grown and sold within the state, so there is no federal authority to regulate it.”
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed freepmail me or post a message here.
You mean, people don't have to deal with criminals in order to get a product that doesn't harm anyone else? How is that a failed experiment? I see it as a success.
I wouldn't count on God saving us, it hasn't worked for millions murdered over the years by Nazi's, communists, etc.
,abortionist,...
Doooood !!!
Barak is way cool, man!
//sarc
We’re wasting much less money perusing harmless stoners. Cops are able to focus on real crime.
Sound like a successful experiment.
Sure you can find A citizen that objects. Not many.
Finally at the end of the list of conditions listed in prop 215 that can be treated with pot....stress. The citizens of California knew exactly what they were voting for. You just don’t like it.
Thank you. That’s a help. Much appreciated.
It must just pain you to go to bed at night knowing that someone, somewhere, is getting stoned and you don’t have the power to imprison him.
So three quarters of an abomination is better than a full abomination. Wow, what a comfort, I can't wait to possibly continue to get my face slapped on a regular basis by this RINO clown.
In his own way McCain is as big a joke as Clinton and Obama are. Bottom line, not a damn one of any of them should be leader of the free world and That's the truth.
In my book it is, yes. 3 is less than 4, isn't it? Especially if--and I realize it's not guaranteed--that 1/4 non-obamination (get it?) is in the area of judicial appointments. Judicial appointments have an incredibly long impact, beyond even the long tenure of the judges on the bench. Their decisions become etched in stone, via stare decesis.
I say never quit, never give up. That means even if there's only one little sliver of upside in a situation, you gotta roll the dice and go for it. What's the alternative?
Those who refuse to vote for either candidate are kidding themselves. All they do is surrender the battlefield and let someone else choose them.
Ok, fine, so we're only fighting for a few things--conservative judges, honor for our military, pro-life policies--isn't that enough? In my view, it ought to be.
Bottom line, not a damn one of any of them should be leader of the free world and That's the truth.
Politics is a scummy business. It's not supposed to be pretty. It's only supposed to be superior to anarchy,and in my view it still is. If we don't fill the vaccuum with someone/something, some other criminal will come along. It's one of those human problems no one has a solution for, as far as I can tell.
Thanks for writing. Hope you don't mind the longwindedness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.