Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain and La Raza/The Race: A “serious lapse of judgment”
Michelle Malkin.com ^ | 05/11/2008 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 05/11/2008 10:55:24 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: mtntop3
Kent-ostensibly-trapped-in-liberal-Seattle (what's keeping him from leaving?) has been for some time now, along with some others, on a feverish mission of rage against McCain and Kamikaze strikes against rank-and-file Republicans.

Please remember to clean up after squeezing out one of those from now on, peanut.

"Feverish mission of rage." LOLOLOLOL!!!!!

81 posted on 05/12/2008 6:49:04 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
If you want to win, you have to reach out to all sort of characters from Hagee to La Raza

La Raza is a racist hate group whose main objective is placing a large section of sovereign United States territory under Mexican jurisdiction. They are an enemy entity and should be treated as such. McCain, if he had a set, should be castigating them, not rewarding them with legitimacy and publicity.

Whatever you're smoking, it can't be legal.
82 posted on 05/12/2008 6:57:09 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Average White Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Although I cannot in good conscience vote for McCain, I will vote in November for any Conservatives running in the other races. At least I can make Congress as conservative as possible.


83 posted on 05/12/2008 8:05:49 AM PDT by BeckB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeckB
Although I cannot in good conscience vote for McCain, I will vote in November for any Conservatives running in the other races.

Agreed. See #12. ;)

84 posted on 05/12/2008 8:07:38 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

That and more sum up my thoughts on the subject.

It would seem to me that a person would just about have to be a collaborator to agree with some of this stuff.

I’ve got a conversation going on right now that touches on this subject, with a guy that seems to profess that he should know a whole lot better. You have to simply ask yourself, “What is really going on here?” as they defend the defenseless, by twisting themselves into knots to do it.


85 posted on 05/12/2008 8:18:40 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Who opposes John McCain's leftist agenda? The RNC, Rep Congress members, the Democrats? Good luck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
You McCain assclowns are selling out U.S. national sovereignty and threatening National Security much more effectively than al Qaeda can ever do on its own. Congratulations for that, too.

Amen.

86 posted on 05/12/2008 8:31:16 AM PDT by Liz (Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
I wouldn't get too upset, my guess is that "The_Republican" owns either a painting or landscaping company.

Or just an automaton that marches with the party.

87 posted on 05/12/2008 9:24:12 AM PDT by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
"That is correct. You are getting it now. If you want to win, you have to reach out to all sort of characters from Hagee to La Raza. However, suicidal purists, they consider it beneath them to reach out and try and win."

Quoted for truth.

That's why suicidal purist bitcons have now found themselves without a party and any representation in Washington. They brought it on themselves, and I for one don't feel a bit sorry for them.
88 posted on 05/12/2008 1:28:30 PM PDT by Antonio C (God bless John McCain, George W. Bush, and our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

More than likely he is willing to put his ego aside and vote for the best candidate unlike you childish bitcons.


89 posted on 05/12/2008 1:33:27 PM PDT by Antonio C (God bless John McCain, George W. Bush, and our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Look, amnesty of some form is going to be passed into law no matter who becomes president. It’s a done deal. Move on to the actual important issues like the WOT.


90 posted on 05/12/2008 1:45:36 PM PDT by Antonio C (God bless John McCain, George W. Bush, and our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Antonio C; calcowgirl; kellynla; Liz
"Look, amnesty of some form is going to be passed into law no matter who becomes president."

Remains to be seen, but the odds are against you. It won't be up to the three losers currently pretending to be real presidential candidates. So far, the notion of amnesty has been torn to bits every time it has been put forward.

91 posted on 05/12/2008 2:21:57 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Antonio C; Liz
Look, amnesty of some form is going to be passed into law no matter who becomes president. It’s a done deal.

Sorry, "mi amigo." The fight is not close to being lost. If you don't like it, ¡Mordeme!

Move on to the actual important issues like the WOT.

Hate to tell ya--most people find the amnesty issue to be more of a threat to the United States than the WOT.

The fact that it is being pushed by Hugo Chavez loving communists should concern you--why doesn't it?

92 posted on 05/12/2008 2:39:19 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Czar

Ooops... I meant to put you on my ping above, not Liz. LOL.

Sorry about that. :-)


93 posted on 05/12/2008 2:40:38 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
For shame, cg!

No harm/no foul...

94 posted on 05/12/2008 2:49:20 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Hate to tell ya--most people find the amnesty issue to be more of a threat to the United States than the WOT.

Got any evidence to back that up or are you just pulling that out of thin air?
95 posted on 05/12/2008 3:23:07 PM PDT by Antonio C (God bless John McCain, George W. Bush, and our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: stratboy; endthematrix
I wouldn't get too upset, my guess is that "The_Republican" owns either a painting or landscaping company.

"Greater love hath no man, that he would willingly make a shrieking, hysterical ass of himself online, on behalf of his pool boy." ;)

96 posted on 05/12/2008 4:13:46 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Czar; calcowgirl; kellynla; Antonio C
........the notion of amnesty has been torn to bits every time it has been put forward........

There is no other issue that unites the political spectrum as does anti-amnesty.

One has only to ask Hillary----she still bears the scars of liberal NY Dems reacting to her support for licensing illegals.

97 posted on 05/12/2008 4:43:59 PM PDT by Liz (Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Liz
There is no other issue that unites the political spectrum as does anti-amnesty.

Yup. See #15.

It's what's going to cost Juan the election, this year... and deservedly so. ;)

98 posted on 05/12/2008 4:49:32 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Forget amnesty ......Move on to the actual important issues like the WOT..............

WOT---yawn.

Must be one of those pukeneos doing a little poselytizing to make a few bucks.........(snore).

99 posted on 05/12/2008 4:49:45 PM PDT by Liz (Without the brave, there'd be no land of the free. Senator Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"Greater love hath no man, that he would willingly make a shrieking, hysterical ass of himself online, on behalf of his pool boy."

That is THE Freeper quote of the year.

I am humbled before your wit.
100 posted on 05/12/2008 4:51:22 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson