To: The_Republican
To: The_Republican
They’re not counting the possibly soon-to-be-dead super delegates, who might change their minds.
3 posted on
05/10/2008 10:26:22 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
To: The_Republican
I cannot help but think that if they would have decided two months ago to include Michigan and Florida the current count would be different.
I believe there is an element of ‘bandwagon voting’ that has occurred since it looked like Milhous was gonna win anyway.
To: The_Republican
EVERY vote must count! Then a recount! Then the courts! Then the delegates! Then the super delegates! Then start over!!
5 posted on
05/10/2008 10:31:06 PM PDT by
Mark
(Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
To: The_Republican
Bump for later.
9 posted on
05/11/2008 12:27:11 AM PDT by
JSteff
(This election is NOT a presidential only. 3 to 5 Supremes will retire! Vote accordingly)
To: The_Republican
Clinton's push for the full inclusion of Florida and Michigan brings the total pledged delegates to 3,566. That would mean the magic number for a majority would rise to 1,784. I just google this, it turns out there's no fixed number for the threshold to be the Dims party nominee. I thought that 2,000 something is fixed (the way 270 EC is), but it seems it depends on the numbers of elected officials in the various states at the day of election.
11 posted on
05/11/2008 2:01:30 AM PDT by
paudio
(Michelle Obama: a Typical Black Woman)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson