Skip to comments.
Sadrist bloc buckles, agrees to let Iraqi Army in Sadr City
Long War Journal ^
| May 10, 2008 10:54 AM
| Bill Roggio
Posted on 05/10/2008 8:47:49 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: All
To: All
From Hot Air:
Sadr wins another battle by surrendering!
***************************EXCERPT**********************
According to the Basra Narrative, Moqtada al-Sadr scored a huge victory yesterday when he capitulated Sadr City to Nouri al-Maliki. Faced off against the Iraqi Army and the US military, Sadr agreed to drop all resistance to the central government as long as his men got to keep their small arms. McClatchy, however, still bitterly clings to its criticism of Maliki for picking a fight against armed thugs and rebels:
Followers of rebel cleric Muqtada al Sadr agreed late Friday to allow Iraqi security forces to enter all of Baghdads Sadr City and to arrest anyone found with heavy weapons in a surprising capitulation that seemed likely to be hailed as a major victory for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Sadrist said the US military would not be allowed to operate inside Sadr City; however there is no confirmation of this from the Iraqi government or the US military. "The Iraqi forces, not the American forces, can come into Sadr City and search for weapons," Baha al Araji, a Sadrist legislator said. "We don't have big weapons, and we want this to stop." Zrabbat biha! First, you Sadr scum are not calling the shots. If the US wants in, the US will go in.
Second, what do you think we are...idiots?? You think the US believes that those rockets that have rained down on the IZ and around Baghdad over the last month or so are coming from somewhere else? We can see and hear where they're launching from, you fools and we know who's been doing it!
What you mean is, you don't have as big of weapons as we do.
23
posted on
05/10/2008 4:12:34 PM PDT
by
Allegra
(Tehran delenda est)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Sadrist must be stupid if they think US Spec Op teams would not continue to be involved in the walling off of Sadr City.
This political entity, if I can be permitted to loosely call it that, seem to forget there is a valid democratically elected government in Iraq. And the government is responsible for the security and well being of all it's citizens.
These people are so backward in so many ways. Stuck into a mold they cannot step out of.
Only brute force sometimes jolts their minds into thinking beyond their little bubble.
24
posted on
05/10/2008 4:22:01 PM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Duncan Hunter was our best choice...)
To: AZLiberty
......To the MSM......
there is no need for the American occupation, bring the troops home...... the new mantra.
25
posted on
05/10/2008 4:44:57 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
....funny how Iraq is backing the UAE ......
It is the way to the future. Iraq wants to join the GCC and must be a good neighbor if it is to become a member.
Iraq and the GCC are part of the Coalition of the Threatened
26
posted on
05/10/2008 4:51:10 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
27
posted on
05/10/2008 4:57:46 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(Any nation that would elect Hillary Clinton as its president has forfeited its right to exist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson