Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sadrist bloc buckles, agrees to let Iraqi Army in Sadr City
Long War Journal ^ | May 10, 2008 10:54 AM | Bill Roggio

Posted on 05/10/2008 8:47:49 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

After over six weeks of heavy fighting in and around the Mahdi Army stronghold Sadr City, where Mahdi Army forces took lopsided casualties in the fighting, the government and the Sadrist political bloc has signed an agreement to end the fighting. The agreement will allow for the Iraqi military to operate freely inside Sadr City while the Mahdi Army must halt its fighting.

The negotiations, which took place over the course of the last several days, culminated in the signing of a 14-point agreement. Both Iraqi government spokesman Ali al Dabbagh and Sadrist spokesman Sheikh Salih al Ubaydi confirmed an agreement was reached.

The full details of the agreement are not public. According to several press reports, the Mahdi Army has made major concessions to the Iraqi government, including allowing the Army to enter Sadr City. There is no agreement for the Mahdi Army to fully disarm, as Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki has insisted since the conflict began on March 25.

The major points of the agreement, based on press reports, are as follows:

• The Iraqi government and the Mahdi Army would observe a four-day cease-fire.
• At the end of the cease-fire, Iraqi forces would be allowed to enter Sadr City and conduct arrests if warrants have been issued, or if the Mahdi Army is in possession of medium or heavy weapons (RPGs, rockets, mortars).
• The Mahdi Army and the Sadrist bloc must recognize the Iraqi government has control over the security situation and has the authority to move security forces to impose the law.
• The Mahdi Army would end all attacks, including mortar and rockets strikes against the International Zone.
• The Mahdi Army must clear Sadr City of roadside bombs.
• The Mahdi Army must close all "illegal courthouses."
• The Iraqi government would reopen the entrances to Sadr City.
• The Iraqi government would provide humanitarian aid to the residents of Sadr City.

The Sadrist said the US military would not be allowed to operate inside Sadr City; however there is no confirmation of this from the Iraqi government or the US military. "The Iraqi forces, not the American forces, can come into Sadr City and search for weapons," Baha al Araji, a Sadrist legislator said. "We don't have big weapons, and we want this to stop."

The Iraqi government insists that internal pressure forced the Sadrist movement to the negotiating table. "It is not the government who pressured the Sadrists into entering this agreement," said Ali al Adeeb, a leading member of the Dawa party. "It is the pressure from the people inside Sadr City and from their own people that will make them act more responsibly."

There is no word on the status of the concrete barrier that is being built that will partition the southern third of Sadr City from the northern neighborhood. In an inquiry to Multinational Division Baghdad, the US command that is working with the Iraqi military to build the barrier in Sadr City, does not expect the construction will stop as the Mahdi Army has not obeyed Sadr's past calls to cease the fighting.

"Seeing as how the Special Groups never listened to [Sadr] to begin with, I don't see how things will change," Lieutenant Colonel Steven Stover, the chief Public Affairs Officer for Multinational Division Baghdad, told The Long War Journal.

The Mahdi Army has taken heavy casualties in Sadr City and the surrounding neighborhoods since the fighting began on March 25. A total of 562 Mahdi Army fighters have been confirmed killed in and around Sadr City since March 25, according to numbers compiled by The Long War Journal. Multinational Division Baghdad recently began to announce that US Special Operations Forces are openly operating on the ground in support of the building of the barrier. The Iraqi government has also pressured the Mahdi Army in Basrah, where 70 percent of the city is now reported as cleared, and the wider South.

Background on the recent fighting in with the Mahdi Army


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; iraq; iraqiarmy; irq; roggio; sadr; sadrcity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: All
And just posted this:

Bush Heads to Middle East Tuesday

21 posted on 05/10/2008 12:14:54 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
From Hot Air:

Sadr wins another battle by surrendering!

***************************EXCERPT**********************

According to the Basra Narrative, Moqtada al-Sadr scored a huge victory yesterday when he capitulated Sadr City to Nouri al-Maliki. Faced off against the Iraqi Army and the US military, Sadr agreed to drop all resistance to the central government as long as his men got to keep their small arms. McClatchy, however, still bitterly clings to its criticism of Maliki for “picking a fight” against armed thugs and rebels:

Followers of rebel cleric Muqtada al Sadr agreed late Friday to allow Iraqi security forces to enter all of Baghdad’s Sadr City and to arrest anyone found with heavy weapons in a surprising capitulation that seemed likely to be hailed as a major victory for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki.


22 posted on 05/10/2008 2:10:17 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Sadrist said the US military would not be allowed to operate inside Sadr City; however there is no confirmation of this from the Iraqi government or the US military. "The Iraqi forces, not the American forces, can come into Sadr City and search for weapons," Baha al Araji, a Sadrist legislator said. "We don't have big weapons, and we want this to stop."

Zrabbat biha! First, you Sadr scum are not calling the shots. If the US wants in, the US will go in.

Second, what do you think we are...idiots?? You think the US believes that those rockets that have rained down on the IZ and around Baghdad over the last month or so are coming from somewhere else? We can see and hear where they're launching from, you fools and we know who's been doing it!

What you mean is, you don't have as big of weapons as we do.

23 posted on 05/10/2008 4:12:34 PM PDT by Allegra (Tehran delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Sadrist must be stupid if they think US Spec Op teams would not continue to be involved in the walling off of Sadr City.
This political entity, if I can be permitted to loosely call it that, seem to forget there is a valid democratically elected government in Iraq. And the government is responsible for the security and well being of all it's citizens.
These people are so backward in so many ways. Stuck into a mold they cannot step out of.
Only brute force sometimes jolts their minds into thinking beyond their little bubble.
24 posted on 05/10/2008 4:22:01 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter was our best choice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

......To the MSM......

there is no need for the American occupation, bring the troops home...... the new mantra.


25 posted on 05/10/2008 4:44:57 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

....funny how Iraq is backing the UAE ......

It is the way to the future. Iraq wants to join the GCC and must be a good neighbor if it is to become a member.

Iraq and the GCC are part of the Coalition of the Threatened


26 posted on 05/10/2008 4:51:10 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

bump


27 posted on 05/10/2008 4:57:46 PM PDT by Skooz (Any nation that would elect Hillary Clinton as its president has forfeited its right to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson