Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This article is well-documented via embedded links. If someone with HTML capability cares to take a minute to add a message with the full article with links, feel free.
1 posted on 05/09/2008 7:23:48 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: freespirited
Here's some more. IMHO, Obama whi is Hussein, is the apex of the domestic enemy agenda in this nation.

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH - OBAMA'S CIRCLE OF FRIENDS AND SUPPORT

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH - BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY AND OBAMA'S CHURCH

THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH - BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

2 posted on 05/09/2008 7:26:32 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

...


3 posted on 05/09/2008 7:29:39 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop; joanie-f; B4Ranch; Grampa Dave; Lurker; Travis McGee; soundbits; Squantos; Eaker; ...
Great documentation on Obama's background and what has gone into making him who he is.

The summary is spot on:

Barack Obama was born of Communist activists, mentored by Communist writer and activist, spent his college days hanging around radical activists (this from Obama’s own book), worked as a radical community organizer learning the radical tactics of Alinsky, kept contact with radicals through the years, and today lends his political skill to the international goals of radical activists, and has radicals working on for his campaign.
This word and detail needs spreading.
4 posted on 05/09/2008 7:30:41 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Is Barry a communist?
Lets see: does the sun rise in the east and set in the west?
YES, he is a communist. YES YES YES and YES!!!


5 posted on 05/09/2008 7:31:48 AM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Obama is a communist and a muslin. Not all communists are atheist.
6 posted on 05/09/2008 7:32:43 AM PDT by gedeon3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Yes. Obama is a communist.

Obama is a muslim inside a Trojan horse. He hates America. He has no respect for the flag. Our nation wouldn't be fit to live in after four years of communist leadership.

That's that bad news.

Now for the good news.

We would be pals with Chavez, R. Castro, the socialist government of Spain and even the Old New Soviet Union would like us. More and more of what we wear and eat will come from communist China.

9 posted on 05/09/2008 7:35:11 AM PDT by fweingart (It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government always gets in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

If it walks like a duck...

And if it quacks like a duck...


11 posted on 05/09/2008 7:35:22 AM PDT by rock_lobsta (Not Your Ordinary Crustacean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

“Barack Obama: Communist?”

Democrat = Communist

BO is a full blown Stalinist.


12 posted on 05/09/2008 7:37:31 AM PDT by exile ("Get off the phone, ya big dope"- The Great One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
"What is this, 1953?"

That should be asked of the Democrat (Socialist/Marxist/Communist) Party. Apparently they never got the word that Communism was proven a failure.

13 posted on 05/09/2008 7:39:12 AM PDT by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

The old racist BO is the Manchurian candidate.


14 posted on 05/09/2008 7:41:01 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Hallmarks of Liberalism: Ingratitude and Envy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

There are no Communists anymore, not really. The Soviet Union is gone. There remain radical socialists and radical Marxists. I believe Hussein to be in that category, but Communist? no. He wouldn’t call his farms “collectives.”


17 posted on 05/09/2008 7:42:49 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Must be true, they are selling his stuff on ebay.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260238157565&indexURL=1&photoDisplayType=2#ebayphotohosting


19 posted on 05/09/2008 7:46:48 AM PDT by sweetiepiezer (BO stinks................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
The thing that scares me most about Obama are his TV ads that ran during the IN primary. One of them talked about the “rich” and how we need to take money away from them to give it to “those who really need it”. He goes on to say that the rich make in 10 minutes what “working people” make in a year and that's not fair. Really? So, I'm supposed to think the rick don't work and they don't need their money? Hey, Stupid! Who do you think creates the jobs that drives this economic system...the poor?

It seems to me that his goal is to take from the rich and give to the poor...exactly the same plan Hillary has. Stated differently, take away from the productive people and give it to the unproductive people. History has shown over and over again that trying to force an equal distribution of income regardless of effort kills the system in the long run. Given that 2/3’s of the current income tax is paid by the top 10% of the wage earners, how much more does this bozo think they can take away before these people take their wealth and talent and bail out? As some other Freeper stated, he's “all turban, no goats”.

20 posted on 05/09/2008 7:47:33 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

A communist??? Just because he wants to confiscate business profits, outlaw gun ownership, surrender in Iraq and bargain with our enemies? NAH! That just means he’s a democrat!


21 posted on 05/09/2008 7:47:50 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

No, it is just all his friends. /sarcasm


23 posted on 05/09/2008 7:49:05 AM PDT by bmwcyle (I always rely on God and Guns in that order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
....(both teach at the University of Chicago now)

Not to pick nits, and I could be wrong but, isn't it the University of Illinois at Chicago?

24 posted on 05/09/2008 7:49:14 AM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
but it was 1995, he met with them once

Following law school, in 1988, Michelle became an associate at the Chicago law firm of Sidley & Austin.

The following year, 1989, Barack Obama joined Sidley Austin as a summer intern -- and Barack and Michelle meet -- she was his summer adviser.

And, in 1989, Obama also met Michelle's associate -- the terrorist, Bernadine Dohrn, who helped bomb something like 25 targets, including the Capitol and the Pentagon -- and of course they both met Bernadine's husband, unrepentant bomber, Bill Ayers!

Another 20 year relationship!

The Obama File


29 posted on 05/09/2008 8:01:33 AM PDT by Beckwith ('Typical White Person')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AliVeritas; Dog

People are starting to catch on...


30 posted on 05/09/2008 8:04:55 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Obama’s not a communist.

He just doesn’t think the people should be allowed to own private property....


33 posted on 05/09/2008 8:13:39 AM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

A Communist??? What is this, 1953? Are we the Un-American Activities Committee? First he was a Muslim, now he’s a Communist? I know, I know, but please, bear with me…

I just naturally tend toward extremes, so I deliberately temper myself when I see something that strikes me as alarming. Consequently, I didn’t say a word when Hot Air posted the picture from a Fox News broadcast that showed one of Barack Obama’s campaign offices with a Cuban flag on the wall, with a stenciled image of revolutionary murderer Che` Guevara on it. Remember this?

I just figured that office would be getting a call from the Mother Ship sometime soon. Not that Obama would be all that irritated by it, but I didn’t figure it meant much besides some hard lefties were working for Obama.

I also pretty much ignored it when Politico reported that Obama had sat down with 60s radicals Bernadine Dohrn and William Ayers in a local Chicago political meeting. Those are two very scary, unrepentant terrorists, but it was 1995, he met with them once, they actually had clout in the neighborhood (both teach at the University of Chicago now), and I figured there was not going to be any serious fallout to the Obama campaign. Yes, if it had been McCain and Rev. Bob Jones it would have been front-page news on the Times for 3 days at least, but the press flacks for the Democrats, we all know it, and that’s that.

Then, I noticed this addition from Hot Air. See-Dubya there received links from readers: one showing a conference in 2002, where Obama and Ayers spoke together as two members on a panel discussing “Intellectuals in a Time of Crisis,” the other showing Obama joining the Weatherman duo giving testimonials for Rashid Khalidi, an Israel-hating Columbia professor, in 2005. And Craig Kincaid at Accuracy In Media reports that Obama and Ayers both serve on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago.

Showing up on the same panels a few times doesn’t make Obama and the Weathermen friends or associates, though the Woods Fund contact suggests they’re at least acquaintances. Sitting on the same panels does, however, suggest that Obama thinks like those two on more than one issue, which is why their paths are crossing. (I suppose it’s not theoretically impossible that Obama was called to balance other views, but balance isn’t often among the stated values of gatherings that invite ex-Weathermen, so I regard this as unlikely.)

I detest two, contradictory things: sleaze attacks and dishonest politicians. They’re contradictory because you have to read and study sleaze attacks to find dishonest politicians. When I receive a report of some background dishonesty, I research it, and if it’s false (most of them are), I get angry and write nasty letters back to the source. I’ve rejected several baleful mailings about Obama’s past that were manifestly sleazy, not to mention provably false.

But in the light of the incidents above, I’m now paying closer attention to a several articles I’ve run across, which appear to be both accurate and relevant:

Lisa Schiffren at National Review discusses the phenomenon of “red diaper babies” (that is, 60s children of Communist activists,) and the likelihood that Barack Obama is one of them. She does not make the case, she just describes the phenomenon: communist activists in the late 50s and early 60s choosing to marry cross-race as an attack on bourgeois society. It’s not implausible, as Barack’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a radical activist at the University of Hawaii, having been stimulated in high school by two teachers who were reputed to have been Communists (the students referred to the hallway between their rooms as “anarchist ally”), and by a Unitarian church that sported liberal theology. See these two snippets from Tim Jones of the Chicago Tribune (here and here), that dance around the question, calling Dunham a “free thinker” and the two teachers that influenced her “members on the staff that encouraged us to think about a lot of things.” This article from the same author fills in detail, pegging the teachers as radical for the times, although by modern standards they seem like run-of-the-mill leftists.

Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy In Media describes an important mentor of Obama’s teenage years, who was a well-known Communist poet. Obama, in his book Dreams From My Father, writes about “a poet named Frank,” who visited them in Hawaii, read poetry, and was full of “hard-earned knowledge” and advice. Frank Marshall Davis, identified as a member of the CPUSA by the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii, appears to have mentored young Barry from 1971 - 1979, when he left Hawaii for college. Davis’ biographer D. Kathryn Takara cites Davis’ “acute sense of race relations and class struggle throughout America and the world” and how he held forth on American imperialism, colonialism and exploitation. Professor Gerald Horne, contributing editor to the Marxist publication Political Affairs, muses about how future generations will note the significance of the relationship between Davis and Obama.

I’m particularly interested in Obama’s period of community activism in Chicago in the 1980s. His employer was the Gamaliel Foundation. Gamaliel, an activist organization strangely merging the teachings of Marxist strategist Saul Alinsky with those of the Apostle Paul, operates with that same sense of religious destiny that we’ve noticed in both Barack and Michelle Obama’s speeches. Alinsky counseled tapping anger as a motivator for radical change; Gamaliel’s Greg Golluzzo notes Obama’s energy in applying this tactic:

Barack was in the community… talking to the people, sensing their passion, their anger and he wanted to create an opportunity for them to express that anger and resolve the problem.”

Ryan Lizza in The New Republic, cites another of Obama’s mentors, radical organizer Mike Kruglic, admiring Obama’s skill at this sort of manipulation:

He was a natural, the undisputed master of agitation, who could engage a room full of recruiting targets in a rapid-fire Socratic dialogue, nudging them to admit that they were not living up to their own standards. As with the panhandler, he could be aggressive and confrontational. With probing, sometimes personal questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain in their lives, tearing down their egos just enough before dangling a carrot of hope that they could make things better.

Kincaid also discusses Obama’s ties with international Socialist organizations. While Obama is not a member of any of these, he accepts the backing of Democratic Socialists of America and backs initiatives championed by Socialist International. These contacts, along with those of the Party of European Socialists, lurk behind the Democratic party’s eagerness to make the United States “become good citizens of the world community.” Invariably this means for the US to cooperate with neo-Marxist initiatives as put forward in the UN. This explains Obama’s sponsoring of the Global Poverty Act, which, based on the UN’s Millennium Declaration, forces the US to commit .7% of its GNP toward foreign aid. (The US, alone among the world’s nations, may already come close to this through private charity, a phenomenon ignored by the UN’s radicals.) This will likely do for the world’s poor what Johnson’s War on Poverty did for the poor of the US — enslave them to the dole, enrich the bureaucrats who administer the programs, and waste an unimaginable amount of money, making the problem worse while driving taxation through the roof.

Where does this leave us? If all the facts cited here are accurate, here’s the complete picture:

Barack Obama was born of Communist activists, mentored by Communist writer and activist, spent his college days hanging around radical activists (this from Obama’s own book), worked as a radical community organizer learning the radical tactics of Alinsky, kept contact with radicals through the years, and today lends his political skill to the international goals of radical activists, and has radicals working on for his campaign. Oh, and he believes opposition to the aims of radical activists will fail because the radicals embody the will of God.

I’m beginning to wonder whether simply pointing to the National Journal’s assessment of Obama’s voting record as the most liberal in the US Senate is strong enough. It appears to me that Mr. Obama embodies the fondest dreams of radical socialist organizers over the years — that someday, a candidate with enough broad, personal appeal would rise to lead the United States away from its defense of individual liberty, and into whole-hearted support of World Socialism. It’s even plausible — not proved here, certainly, but plausible — that Obama has trained his entire life for this role, and that he’s literally a plant from within the world of radical Marxism to help achieve their goal of world domination by removing the opposition of Marxism’s only effective enemy — the libertarian instincts of the United States.

A fairly thorough but concise history of Obama’s political synthesis can be found here.


35 posted on 05/09/2008 8:22:46 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson