To: doug from upland
This is weird. As I read this, they are by fiat deciding to reduce Hillary’s lead to get their delegates seated? Is that right? That’s so far from democracy I need confirmation.
3 posted on
05/07/2008 7:35:03 PM PDT by
kc8ukw
To: kc8ukw
Not much less democratic than holding a primary without all the candidates on the ballot.
To: kc8ukw
Hillary’s Lead? What lead?
To: kc8ukw
That’s so far from democracy I need confirmation..Democracy has nothing to do with how a political party chooses it’s nominee. There is no constitutional ‘right’ to even participate in choosing the nominee of your party. The Dims or Republicans can choose their candidate however they want. It might not look good from a public relations stand point, but it is their ‘right’.
79 posted on
05/08/2008 5:55:18 AM PDT by
Lurking in Kansas
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down t heir level, then beat you with experience.)
To: kc8ukw
"This is weird. As I read this, they are by fiat deciding to reduce Hillary’s lead to get their delegates seated? Is that right? That’s so far from democracy I need confirmation."Well, Obama HAS bought more delegates than Hillary.
97 posted on
05/08/2008 9:04:01 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(Obama's bus needs a lift kit just to clear all the bodies!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson