Skip to comments.
Superdelegates say, we will decide
The Hill ^
| 5/06/08
| Alexander Bolton
Posted on 05/07/2008 10:49:34 AM PDT by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
1
posted on
05/07/2008 10:49:34 AM PDT
by
kingattax
To: kingattax
So this begs the question: Who is more electable in the GE, Obama or Clinton?
2
posted on
05/07/2008 10:52:07 AM PDT
by
dawn53
To: kingattax
"Uncommitted Democratic superdelegates in Congress overwhelmingly say they wont necessarily back the presidential candidate who wins the most primary delegates. Instead, electability will be very important in their decision." And the train wreck in the making continues on down the track.
3
posted on
05/07/2008 10:52:11 AM PDT
by
lexusppd
To: kingattax
Stock up on popcorn, hot wings, brats and ammo.
4
posted on
05/07/2008 10:52:15 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
To: kingattax
" only four said they regarded the primary vote as decisive. "
Then why bother with a primary at all? This is the stupidest election I can remember.
Carolyn
5
posted on
05/07/2008 10:53:35 AM PDT
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: kingattax
6
posted on
05/07/2008 10:54:09 AM PDT
by
evets
(I have a crush on Hillary.)
To: evets
EVERY VOTE MUST COUNT!! EVERY VOTE MUST COUNT!! Florida where are yoU?????
To: kingattax; Owl_Eagle
Who sees a big lib riot?
Pass the popcorn...
To: tsmith130
Stock up on popcorn, hot wings, brats and ammo.LOL...that sounds like a dang good plan
9
posted on
05/07/2008 10:55:37 AM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: tsmith130
Stock up on popcorn, hot wings, brats and ammo. You're going to let your kids watch this train wreck?
Sorry, really slow work day, and I just couldn't resist...
10
posted on
05/07/2008 10:55:54 AM PDT
by
Hoffer Rand
(0bambi: the audacity of hype)
To: kingattax
What they are saying is “How much are you willing to pay me for my vote?” or “Will you promise to make me the Ambassader to St. Lucia?”.
11
posted on
05/07/2008 10:57:37 AM PDT
by
LetsRok
To: kingattax
The democraps really ought to be on fire this year!
Denver’ll be on fire, too.
12
posted on
05/07/2008 10:57:45 AM PDT
by
Nervous Tick
(La Raza hates white folks. And John McCain loves La Raza!)
To: dawn53
"So this begs the question: Who is more electable in the GE, Obama or Clinton?" I saw on CNN this morning...so maybe not real reliable...
They polled Obama supporters and most would vote for Hillary in the GE if she was the nominee.
Same poll of Hillary supporters and the numbers dropped for voting for Obama if he got the nod.
Thus CNN says Hillary is more likely to be able to compete with McCain in the GE.
FWIW...
To: kingattax
Sounds a little like a Hillary press release. If she does take the nomination on this basis, though, it will be extremely interesting to watch the demographics in the general election.
I'm still calling it Obama by a nose but I doubt if either staff is sleeping very well.
To: kingattax
"Of 42 lawmakers interviewed by The Hill, only four said they regarded the primary vote consent of the governed as decisive necessary."
There, fixed.
15
posted on
05/07/2008 10:59:56 AM PDT
by
messierhunter
(Liberals do not believe in any inalienable rights.)
To: dawn53
Clinton is more electable.
After the Wright and Obama’s terrorist buddy, he lost everybody but blacks and white elite liberals.
I figure if they want the White House, put Hillary in and figure for a short time the blacks will be mad.
But after 40+ years of Democrats being the Klan, putting abortion clinics all through black communities to kill their children and failing them like crazy in public education... so what?
Democrats have been pissing on blacks forever, since way before they used to hose them when they tried to desegregate schools.
Blacks feel they have no where else to go and vote than their old masters of the Democrat party, so I guess they should go with Hillary.The blacks will remain on the plantation like good helpers in the end IMO.
16
posted on
05/07/2008 11:00:12 AM PDT
by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: lexusppd
“Uncommitted Democratic superdelegates in Congress overwhelmingly say they wont necessarily back the presidential candidate who wins the most primary delegates. Instead, electability will be very important in their decision.”
So it really doesn’t matter who the people want as a candidate, they are the deciders.
Shows what a farce the whole thing is.
17
posted on
05/07/2008 11:00:17 AM PDT
by
sheana
To: dawn53
18
posted on
05/07/2008 11:00:33 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: dawn53
So this begs the question: Who is more electable in the GE, Obama or Clinton? Clinton.
19
posted on
05/07/2008 11:00:59 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: kingattax
Your article is dated the sixth. The situation with delegates has changed since then.
20
posted on
05/07/2008 11:01:45 AM PDT
by
mysterio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson