You don't understand Newt's position on "global warming" at all, do you.
No, your ignorance and naivete is showing. I watched Newt in that pathetic global warming "debate" with Kerry. He gave the entire FRAUD/HOAX credibility. And Newt's commercial with Pelosi did the same thing. Then he tries to give some lame statement to pacify dupes like you...
It's tough to counter flat-out bald-faced lying, but I'll give it a shot.
I watched that debate twice, once live as broadcast on C-SPAN, and then again a few days later. Both times start to finish in the entirety, and both times because I've been following Newt and his ideas since 1994 and wanted to see how he'd handle "global warming".
First, he doesn't, except to concede (without argument) that there's something going on. Then he spent the remaining 95 percent of the "debate" convincing the audience (while undermining Kerry's position) that market-based, capitalist, non-coercive solutions are the only effective remedies to that "something" in the environment.
If you think about capitalist economics for just one second you'll instantly understand that Newt's 100 percent market-based approach will solve only "real" and not perceived. made-up, or illusory problems such as anthropomorphic "global warming". People won't buy non-solutions to non-problems.
SO the name of the game now is to convince folks to reject coercive government "solutions" and embrace capitalist approaches, and Newt is very good at making that argument.
As with you and your hatred for Newt, there's really no point in arguing with those who believe in "global warming".