Posted on 05/06/2008 9:38:20 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(CNN) — The core of Hillary Clinton’s argument to superdelegates has been her electability – that she is the candidate most likely to beat presumptive Republican nominee John McCain in November. But according to exit polls, voters don’t share that view.
In Indiana, Democratic primary voters were equally split over who was most likely to beat McCain, with both drawing 48 percent. And in North Carolina, voters gave the edge to Barack Obama: 54 percent thought he was more likely to win in November, while 40 percent [...]
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...
And unfortunately, when they are not campaigning against each other their positions are identical. When it comes to how they'd govern it's tweedledum and tweedledumer.
I still hold out hope that something will happen to McCain and we get a do-over at our convention.
It could happen.
I have told my children with great authority that the worst President in my lifetime was Jimmy Carter.
We cannot inflict such a repeat on the next generation.
MCCAIN FOR PRESIDENT.
Just imagine if Ward Churchill's brightest pupil decided to become President and figured out a way to bamboozle America long enough to do so.
How is that any different that the arrafatass kissing one?
McCAIN- BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS UNTHINKABLE
MCCAIN FOR PRESIDENT.
Maybe he'll turn out to be another invisble "remember who I am, I'm the President, I do exist!" president like Ford.
As stated earlier, in this very thread: folks hereabouts have been Guilty And Then Some of virtually criminal underestimation of Barack Obama, and the very real electoral threat he poses, practically since the first 'rat primaries/caucuses in New Hampshire, etc.
Is he scum...? Yes. Is he a dangerous, wild-eyed socialist radical? Absolutely. Is he (potentially) an infinitely cannier, more capable political "natural" than either Bill or Cankles ever DREAMED of being...? You damned BETCHA!
His organization has now signed up, by rough estimate, somewhere in the neighborhood of 1.5 M-I-L-L-I-O-N brand, spanking new voters over the past half year or so -- all of 'em fanatically sworn and devoted to their gleaming, fairy tale Obamessiah.
As some other 'Rat politician put it, just the other day, upon hearing that for the first time (don't remember if it was Fat Teddy, or not; I think maybe it was Fat Teddy): "That's not a 'voting base'; that's a political PARTY."
MEGA-ugly, come November. Bookmark it, by all means.
I believe it is quite possible the next attack will ignite a civil war. If it happens, let it be connected to the donkeys.
Not that there is any chance I would vote for a liberal regardless of the letter preceding the name.
/against La Raza
Zaaackley! She simply moves from center stage to stage left. She stays in the picture frame until she loses her Senate seat.
My point exactly. ;)
I think he’ll suffer a loss as bad as McGovern’s.
Will you be voting for McCain?
Obama=McGovern.
November won't even be close.
Yep. My belief that Hillary would be much easier to beat has little to do with my plans for November.
Oh, and I’m typing this on a MBP, so please don’t crucify me. ;)
26% OF REPUBLICAN VOTERS AGAINST MCCAIN IN NORTH CAROLINA...
If fellow FReeper Bender will kindly allow me to filch his signature comeback line, just this once:
"WE'RE BONED!!!"
As long as he keeps his flock of sheeple in line, B. Hussein will win it. It will be at this point where we need to start considering plans to relocate. It’ll be Germany ca. 1930.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.