Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anger over relaxing of gun law for Olympics (UK)
Scotland On Sunday ^ | 03 May 2008 | Jenny Percival

Posted on 05/06/2008 10:32:43 AM PDT by neverdem

ANTI-GUN campaigners have warned the Government not to relax firearms legislation in the run-up to the London Olympics, saying: "A child's life is not worth a medal." UK and Scottish ministers have agreed that from August, sportsmen and women will be given special permission to use their weapons at Ministry of Defence ranges in Britain. At present, competitors have to train abroad.

It is a major breakthrough for British Shooting, the sport's governing body, which has campaigned for years to exempt its members from the strict laws introduced after gun collector Thomas Hamilton massacred 16 children and a teacher at Dunblane Primary School in 1996.

But Anne Pearston, who led the Snowdrop Campaign that led to the Firearms Amendments Act 1997 banning the ownership of handguns, said she was opposed to the exemption. "A child's life is not worth a medal," she said.

Pearston said while there had been other school massacres around the world, the UK's tough laws had prevented further British tragedies.

She said: "I want us to get to the 20th anniversary without another school massacre. We don't want any weakening of the legislation – if anything it needs to be tightened up. The Government is supposed to safeguard the public, not be swayed by sportspeople."

The UK-wide Gun Control Network, which replaced the Snowdrop Campaign, said it had been pressing ministers to keep the handgun ban intact.

Gill Marshall-Andrews, the network's chairman, said: "We are opposed to any kind of change in the legislation, even for training purposes. Some of those who have taken up the sport are young enough to have done so since the ban was introduced, knowing that it was illegal in this country. Why should we put wider society at risk for the sake of a few sportspeople?"

John Leighton-Dyson, British Shooting's performance director, said: "We are not asking for US-style liberalisation. We just want an opportunity for a small number of sportsmen and women to be allowed to compete in the Olympics and win gold medals for their country. I'm sure that's something that every right-minded member of the public would support."

The UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport said it expected a trial exemption for sportsmen and women to begin in August after the Beijing Olympics.

The exemption would run up to the 2012 London Olympics and, if successful, be extended to the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncrime; londonolympics2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Ramius
Have I got this right? The UK Olympic shooting team cannot train inside the UK?

Brilliant move. Too bad they haven't managed to outlaw militant Islamist acts of terror. When you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. The UK has plenty of armed outlaws and few armed subjects. They even have "knife control" laws. Next they will outlaw rocks, beer bottles and cricket bats.

41 posted on 05/06/2008 7:18:10 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

As silly as her campaign was and is, the woman DID lose a child in the Dunblane massacre.

So ‘smug’ is a harsh word.


42 posted on 05/07/2008 3:05:40 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

She lost a child in the 1996 Dunblane killings.


43 posted on 05/07/2008 3:06:23 PM PDT by the scotsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

A feeling of self-satisfication and self-righteousness that goes against all fact and common sense is “smugness”.

A person can be pitied and yet be smug at the same time. Cindy Sheehan is an example of such a person.

Ms. Pearston’s campaign has not led to less children being killed by guns, but to more children being killed by guns.

“Smug” may be a harsh word, but pushing an agenda that is killing other mother’s children seems a bit harsh as well.


44 posted on 05/07/2008 4:14:09 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson