Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arianna: McCain told me he didn’t vote for Bush in 2000 (Maverick double-standard...?)
Hot Air ^ | 05/05/2008 | Allahpundit

Posted on 05/05/2008 10:17:37 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Conservatives, as you surely must know, come in a great many more flavors

Why waste so many words to make one wrong point? Conservatives don't come in many flavors when it comes to political parties. There is no such thing as a conservative Democrat. That obliterates your earlier argument. End of story.

121 posted on 05/06/2008 8:44:24 AM PDT by Huck (Watching the DEMs come down the stretch is like watching the Mets come down the stretch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Why waste so many words to make one wrong point? Conservatives don't come in many flavors when it comes to political parties. There is no such thing as a conservative Democrat.

I "wasted" no words whatsoever. You're (evidently) either incapable of reading for straightforward, grade school level comprehension; are simply being disingenuous; or (quite possibly) both.

There is no such thing as a conservative Democrat.

Perfect case in point: find where I (purportedly) stated this, please. (HINT: you cannot.) OnetwothreeGO.

Pitiful. Absolutely pitiful.

122 posted on 05/06/2008 8:50:55 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
It's a pretty safe assumption that a Freeper vote is a potential Republican vote"...? Note your own usage of the word potential, right there; NOT "given," or "rightful," or "assured

That's right. It's not assured. Some freepers will stay home and wet their beds on election night. It happens. But the simple fact is that freepers have one major party to choose from, and that's the GOP. If a freeper stays home, it's a GOP vote lost. It is a plus for Democrats.

123 posted on 05/06/2008 8:51:38 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

You’re a poor judge of your own writing, that’s for sure. Somewhere in all that muck is a point. What was it?


124 posted on 05/06/2008 8:53:34 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Huck
That's right. It's not assured. Some freepers will stay home and wet their beds on election night.

Oh, dear.

Oh, dear.

[::slowly, distinctly::] "I'm dreadfully sorry, little boy. For moment there, you almost sounded like a real grownup. May I speak with either your mommy or your daddy now, please...?"

Dismissed, kiddo.

125 posted on 05/06/2008 8:55:58 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (If McCain really CAN "win without conservatives," then why do you care if I vote for him or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Zsa Zsa Huffington is not a reliable source. That said, after the 2006 amnesty fiasco, I'd be hard pressed to vote for Bush if he could have run again, myself.

As for McCain, the man obviously has a personal animus toward Bush. However, he managed to put that aside to endorse the president in 2004. He even spoke at the convention, right? That's a lot more important than his individual vote, in my opinion.
126 posted on 05/06/2008 9:01:57 AM PDT by Antoninus (Siblings are the greatest gift parents give their children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Ad hominem followed by retreat. LOL. Who’s the child? lol! Thanks for the belly laugh. Enjoy your parentheses!


127 posted on 05/06/2008 9:02:57 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I won’t vote for McCain unless MItt Romney is the VP pick but I very seriously doubt McCain will pick Romney for VP because standing next to Romney, McCain would look old, ugly and stupid.

DITTO!!!!

128 posted on 05/06/2008 9:06:53 AM PDT by MadelineZapeezda ( MUST SEE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkgHkxIfgBc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

No problem, but what got the skids greased happened early on, jmo.

What happened in WV was just hardball politics.


129 posted on 05/06/2008 10:19:49 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline—1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Interesting from a few points of view - and raises more than a few questions!

For my part, I do not place much trust in a lot of the essential details of this story.

This is primarily because of the source of this account. I expect repeated attempts like this between now and November to try and separate conservative and mainstream Republicans {further} from McCain.

Even if no self-respecting Republican would be persuaded to cross the aisle and vote for Hitlery, or buh-Rockstar Obamessiah, through discontent, some might be deluded into thinking that withholding their vote will somehow “send a “serves them right” message to McCain and the GOP.

It will not.

These are far too dangerous times that we live in. The resultant (s)election of either one of the two blatant Socialists on the donkey side of the aisle could prove absolutely crippling to the US.

As a bastion of freedom in the western world {while} we remain at this critical crossroads of a historical religious/ideological conflict, we cannot afford to sacrifice the security of our nation and our very existence to a nakedly political squabble over affairs that are primarily domestic in nature.

I am as conservative as they come. Barry Goldwater was to my left! I fully appreciate the objections to McCain, which he has brought onto himself by his repeated and unnecessary crossings of the aisle.

But McCain is in the right place when it comes to understanding the serious and violent nature of the islamofascist threat against all western civilization - but particularly against the United States. He already knows the danger Iran’s leaders, secret police, and their mullahs pose, and I believe he is fully prepared NOT to tolerate it one minute longer than necessary.

Hitlery CLAIMS that she would respond in a prompt and forceful manner - but we have had precious few reasons over the years to place much trust in what P.I.A.P.S. says she would do - or her reasons for it.

Buh-Rockstar Obamessiah, on the other hand, is all for sitting down face to face with Ahma-damnutjob of Iran, and listening to him - apparently without any conditions.

Neither of them can be trusted with preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States of America.

That is the most important bottom line - at least until the mohammadan threat has been interdicted severely and significantly!

A.A.C.

you gotta hand it to McCain - because you don’t dare hand it to Hitlery or Obamessiah!

A.A.C.


130 posted on 05/06/2008 10:31:15 AM PDT by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe
Both McCain and Bush felt that it would benefit their political careers if they formed an alliance. Bush needed McCain because of his indy cred and McCain needed Bush because he wanted to be a big time player in the Republican party. (McCain may have flirted with the Dems, but he's a savvy political operator and knew that he would be ostracized ala Lieberman).

However, I've always felt that they've personally disliked each other since the fun in SC in 2000!, and while I'm sure that it's scabbed over, it's probably never truly healed. McCain and Bush spent nine months in 2001 sniping @ each other like they were petulant two-year-olds, and if I remember correctly, Bush signed McCain-Feingold without a Rose Garden ceremony just to spite McCain. The nice people from Al Qaeda were the only thing that led to a detente... Even then, McCain has continued to be a thorn in the Bushies side.

The fact that McCain didn't vote for Bush strikes me as pretty plausible, but I highly doubt that he'd blab about it in front of media whore Arianna. But it really does show the ridiculousness of the left... Reminding people that Bush and McCain have lots of reasons to hate each other actually HELPS McCain considering how unpopular Bush is with the unwashed masses.

131 posted on 05/06/2008 6:04:23 PM PDT by Accygirl (My Savior already came to the Earth.. His name was Jesus, not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson