Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill to Increase Domestic Oil and Natural Gas Production; Coal-Derived Fuel Mandate
www.greencarcongress.com ^ | 04 May 2008 | Staff

Posted on 05/05/2008 6:29:39 AM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Red Badger
...and lift the one-year moratorium on developing oil shale in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah.

This is such and important part of being energy independent. The area about which Domeneci is referring is called the Green River Formation and is estimated to have "..from 1.2 to 1.8 trillion barrels. Not all resources in place are recoverable; however, even a moderate estimate of 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from oil shale in the Green River Formation is three times greater than the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. Present U.S. demand for petroleum products is about 20 million barrels per day. If oil shale could be used to meet a quarter of that demand, the estimated 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from the Green River Formation would last for more than 400 years.

21 posted on 05/05/2008 6:49:54 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

BUMP!


22 posted on 05/05/2008 6:50:21 AM PDT by A. Morgan (VOTE FOR A LIBERAL N' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS and OUTA' GAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imskylark

The problem is that many of them are gutless.


23 posted on 05/05/2008 6:51:09 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

the nasty republicans are at it again. they want to soil our earth by drilling for oil. they want to further greed, dirtiness, foul air, foul interaction between people and crass materialism.

they should be ashamed of themselves.

/sarcasm off/


24 posted on 05/05/2008 6:52:02 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

My take is that there enough Rats who want to pass the legislation to do it. The outrage over the price of fuel trumps the vociferous but minority of envirowackos.

Something good will pass before the end of July. Both houses.


25 posted on 05/05/2008 6:53:18 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Rather than moan about the Dems expected reaction to the bill, why not all on FR get behind it and pressure Congress as we did with the no-amnesty campaign. Can we do it again???
26 posted on 05/05/2008 6:58:49 AM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

My thoughts exactly!.........


27 posted on 05/05/2008 6:59:36 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Coal liquefaction and gasification should be nicely profitable at about mid-50s/bbl, depending on how one amortises the physical plant. Might have to add a couple of dollars to that figure for inflation and regulatory mopery and dopery.


28 posted on 05/05/2008 6:59:36 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Thanks for the link!.........


29 posted on 05/05/2008 7:00:22 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

We should have a “Manhattan Project” to build refineries and “Coal-to-liquid” plants here just for US!..............


30 posted on 05/05/2008 7:01:35 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The Senate passed an energy bill in 1995 that gave the green light for drilling in ANWR... Clinton vetoed it.
31 posted on 05/05/2008 7:02:19 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
" The mean-case estimate is that there are 10.4 billion technically recoverable barrels of oil in ANWR,..."

Multiply that by 4 or 5 and that is how much recoverable oil is actually there. The 10 billion figure was from seismic surveys in the 1980s. Seismic technology has advanced much since then and the estimates back then were based of poor technology and processing algorithms.

I work with a geophysicist who worked on the ANWR seismic survey back in the 1980s and he claims 4 to 5 times the amount of recoverable oil than what they first estimated.

If nothing else, let's get a good seismic survey done on the ANWR today.

32 posted on 05/05/2008 7:03:22 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The next time a Rat tells the American public that it will take at least 10 years before we see any refined petro from new drilling, they need to be ask if they care about "the children" since this will benefit them greatly.
If we had ignored the "10 year" strawman argument the first time we heard it 15 years ago, things might be different...
33 posted on 05/05/2008 7:03:56 AM PDT by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
"Maybe this would have helped back in 2001 to 2007 when you know, the GOP could actually pass such legislation. Why even bother introducing it now when you know it has no chance of passing?"

One possible short term benefit is that it could drive the futures market down for a time being. Just a thought.

34 posted on 05/05/2008 7:05:10 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

That should be brought out in the campaign........


35 posted on 05/05/2008 7:05:46 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
Yep. The problem with kerogen production from shale is not producing it; there are already a couple of proven technologies.

The problem -- problemS, actually -- are two: getting the goobermint's fat arse out of the way, and a potential collapse in the price of crude if/when shale-based production gets into full swing.

There almost certainly will have to be a compensating tariff on foreign crude, once shale-based production is under way, to prevent the price of crude from falling to a point where the producers' huge investment(s) go sour. Probably a sliding scale, something like that, with a trigger around $60-62 and a base somewhere around $45-48/bbl-equivalent.

36 posted on 05/05/2008 7:06:18 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Just the announcement that the US **intends** to **begin** kerogen production from shale in (presumably) the near future will knock $15 off the crude price in 2 weeks' time -- at the back end of the strip, but not any nearby contracts (the price effect on the nearby contracts will be minimal, at least among pros). Never mind that actual production from shale has a probable 3-5 years' startup/lag time.

That's why they're called futures mkts, after all.

37 posted on 05/05/2008 7:10:10 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy
This will be fought tooth and nail by the Rats and their envio-buddies.

During an election year, with gas prices hovering at $4 a gallon

Let the Dems fight against it!

38 posted on 05/05/2008 7:12:13 AM PDT by airborne (LETS GO PENS!!! LETS GO PENS!!! LETS GO PENS!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

39 posted on 05/05/2008 7:15:19 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
"...at the back end of the strip, "

What does that mean?

40 posted on 05/05/2008 7:15:23 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson