Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tribes, U.S. sign deal on NW dams (OR, WA)
The Oregonian ^ | May 3, 2008 | Scott Learn

Posted on 05/03/2008 10:45:55 AM PDT by jazusamo

HORSETHIEF LAKE, Wash. -- Fidelia Andy was a 6-year-old happily running coffee to tribal fishermen at Celilo Falls when the federal government signed a deal with the tribes that flooded the falls and her family's home in the rising waters behind The Dalles Dam.

On Friday, more than 50 years later, Andy and other leaders of four Northwest tribes finalized a new $900 million agreement with the federal government that they hope will begin to reverse the damage done by Columbia River system dams.

"We Indians gave up so much in the past," Andy, a Yakama tribal leader and chairwoman of the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, said just before Friday's signing ceremony. "It's time a little bit of it started coming back."

The accord requires the Bonneville Power Administration and other agencies to pay for 10 years of habitat and hatchery improvements on tributaries important to the tribes. That's projected to boost wholesale power rates by up to 4 percent.

In exchange, the Colville, Umatilla, Warm Springs and Yakama nations agreed to support the government's plan for operating the dams for 10 years and bow out of a long-running lawsuit challenging dam operations.

On Friday, beside Washington's Horsethief Lake just upstream of The Dalles Dam, the tribal chairmen and leaders of the federal agencies signed a deer hide to cement the agreement. Fish popped up periodically during the ceremony.

Many of the tribal leaders said it was a historic and emotional day.

Terry Goudy-Rambler, a member of the Yakama Nation's tribal council, told those gathered by the lake that she was born in Celilo Village close to the falls, a productive Native fishery for thousands of years. "I remember when the mist from the falls came (into the village) to fall across my face," she said through tears.

"It has been taken from us, our way of life," she said. "But today we realize that the world moves on, and we as an Indian people have to make changes."

The deal provides for hundreds of habitat and hatchery projects, about 60 percent new and the rest existing but now locked in for 10 years. The tribes run many of those programs.

The deal was two years in the making and rough going at times, all sides said. This week, the signing ceremony had to be postponed because of concern among Yakama tribal members that the agreement ceded too much of the tribe's sovereignty. The Nez Perce of Idaho, another key tribe in the river system, has declined to go along.

The state of Oregon and environmentalists still involved in the federal lawsuit over dam operations question whether the agreement does enough to save runs of salmon and steelhead listed under the federal Endangered Species Act. Roughly three-quarters of the money would help nonlisted species, they say.

Environmentalists also question whether the deal promotes hatchery fish at the expense of wild fish.

Those arguments will continue in federal court before U.S. District Court Judge James Redden. But the focus Friday was on what can be achieved when efforts shift from litigation to on-the-ground work.

Mike Marchand, chairman of the Colville tribes in eastern Washington, said Grand Coulee Dam almost destroyed salmon productivity in his tribe's lands.

Among other improvements, the new agreement means Salmon Creek, an Okanagan River tributary that hasn't had fish in Marchand's lifetime, probably will have salmon in it once again.

Billions of dollars have been spent on salmon restoration in the Columbia River basin, with often discouraging results. But Steve Wright, Bonneville Power's administrator, pledged that the deal will boost numbers of salmon, steelhead and lamprey in the river system.

Tribal leaders said they'll be watching the government closely.

The two sides are "starting to work together more and understand each other more," Marchand said. On the other hand, he said, smiling, "We keep our eyes open all the time."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Oregon; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: americanindians; columbiariver; fisheries; nwtribes; oregon; rivers; salmon; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 05/03/2008 10:45:55 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; george76; girlangler; fish hawk

Salmon Ping!


2 posted on 05/03/2008 10:48:17 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; coffeebreak; ...
Flag-Oregon
Oregon Ping

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.

3 posted on 05/03/2008 10:49:49 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
But Steve Wright, Bonneville Power's administrator, pledged that the deal will boost numbers of salmon, steelhead and lamprey in the river system.

Lamprey???

4 posted on 05/03/2008 10:57:07 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Here's some Lamprey info.

Lamprey

Lamprey Data

5 posted on 05/03/2008 11:05:01 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Next, the tribes need to go sea lion hunting.


6 posted on 05/03/2008 11:08:33 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

You bet, that would solve the sea lion problem on the Columbia River.


7 posted on 05/03/2008 11:12:31 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Yummy lamprey. My friend once ate the lamprey lips at an indian ceremony. I think they all laughed at him.

They make great sturgeon bate.

8 posted on 05/03/2008 11:13:34 AM PDT by mickey finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Lamprey are parasites. Why would the tribes or the Bonneville Authority want to perpetuate their presence?
9 posted on 05/03/2008 11:17:56 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: okie01

I don’t know the answer but suspect it’s something along the same lines as the enviro nuts wanting to save the sucker fish in Klamath Lake.


10 posted on 05/03/2008 11:30:49 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Lamprey eels were and still are a large part of the diet of the coastal Indians of the North West. Most like them smoked but are good cooked just about any way. Most whites balk at eating them because of the slime on the outer skin(which comes right off ) and the fact that it reminds them of snakes. It is also handy that they run a little off season from the salmon runs and makes food gathering more handy for more of the season.
11 posted on 05/03/2008 11:41:43 AM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism is dying. Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george76
And they will as soon as we open season on environ”mental”ists.
12 posted on 05/03/2008 11:43:13 AM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism is dying. Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Not so. See post 11.


13 posted on 05/03/2008 11:44:51 AM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism is dying. Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Thanks, fish hawk, that’s interesting and makes a lot of sense.


14 posted on 05/03/2008 11:47:23 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Lamprey eels were and still are a large part of the diet of the coastal Indians of the North West. Most like them smoked but are good cooked just about any way.

OK. That makes sense. Thanks for the informative response.

My attitude was based on the understanding that lampreys ingtruded and virtually destroyed the lake trout population in the Great Lakes.

Is there no risk of such a thing in the Columbia Basin?

15 posted on 05/03/2008 12:53:24 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; steel_resolve; angry elephant; snowsprite; American in Israel; Gator113; Horusra; ...
Washington State Ping Banner: Thanks to truth49 for the ping.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Say WA? Evergreen State ping

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.

Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

16 posted on 05/03/2008 12:57:56 PM PDT by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01
The Great Lakes is a separate matter. They have had big problems with Lampreys there in the past. That may have been fixed by now. I admit I do not know very much about the Lamprey problems on the Columbia, or in fact, if there are any problems. I do know a lot about the Klamath as I am a Yurok Indian from there. On the Klamath the Lampreys come into the mouth and go upstream to spawn just like the salmon do. The Klamath is swift and fish and eels work hard to get up to their spawning grounds. The Lampreys there don't seem to do any damage to salmon, if any at all. I've caught salmon before with Lamprey sucker marks on their sides but never heard of an eel killing a salmon. And like the salmon, they are fresher and better eating the closer to the mouth of the river you catch them.
17 posted on 05/03/2008 1:08:23 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism is dying. Thank God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Mark for later.


18 posted on 05/03/2008 1:21:18 PM PDT by Just Lori (There is nothing democrat-"ic" about democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It wasn’t theirs to “lose” and it isn’t theirs to reclaim. Once again civilization pays the price of political correctness...


19 posted on 05/03/2008 2:09:13 PM PDT by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hmm. The government made an agreement 50 years ago. What did the tribes get then?

Why do we have to pay more now?

Isn’t this “Indian Giving?”


20 posted on 05/03/2008 9:51:06 PM PDT by Schmuck281
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson