[Politicalmom]

Even if she is 18 as she claimed, she was 15 when she got pregnant the first time.

[MizSterious]

And if she’s 15, then she was 12.

[org.whodat]

Even if she is 18 as she claimed, she was 15 when she got pregnant the first time.

true!!

[El Gato]

Even if she is 18 as she claimed, she was 15 when she got pregnant the first time.

Still no reason to take her baby away from her. We *know* that one is hers. Just put them both in a shelter. Newborns really need their mother around, if only to nurse them. Nursing is much better than formula for any number of reasons. The Judge and CPS have by this action shown that they really don't give a rat's patootie about the welfare of the children.

[El Gato]

Sept 1, 2005 was when the legal age for marriage, with parental permission, was changed to 16, from 14. a 20 month old would probably have been concieved about November of 2005. If she is 18 as she says, she would have been 15 in May of 2005, for some period. She could have been legally married, with parental permission, anytime between May of 2004 and September of 2005.

Is all that likely? Probably not, but I'll bet the Authorities haven't even checked the marriage records for the proper period and jurisdictions.

It's also not clear if she and the man she names as the father were even in Texas in November of 2005, or a bit earlier. If they were not, then the laws in whatever state they were in were at the time, would be the deciding factor.

Again a 19 y/o and a 15 y/o is way different than a 40 or 50 something and a 15 y/o. Willing is also way differnent that forced.

[Tennessee Nana]

Even if she is 18 as she claimed, she was 15 when she got pregnant the first time.
_______________________________________

now, now...

no fair, counting....

BYW, are those “rights” groups there for the under-age girls, or the old pedophiles ????: