When you presuppose it's a witch hunt, your conclusion will find it's a witch hunt.
Sorry, but I don’t trust government interrogators ONE BIT.
Thanks for being honest about your presuppositions and biases. The more clear we are about these, the more transparent and productive our discussions can be. From that statement, you say that it's pointless to discuss anything with you at this point. For all the evidence we have on the case is from the distrusted government interrogators. Anything they say is automatically false to you.
So, you have an unfalsifiable hypothesis. Those types of hypotheses do not produce the strongest arguments. I don't mean that as a slam. It's just a statement of fact. No matter what the outcome is, or what evidence is produced, it is from the government and could be manufactured, trumped-up, or otherwise falsified.
the808bass: “When you presuppose it’s a witch hunt, your conclusion will find it’s a witch hunt.”
When you presuppose the cultists are guilty, your conclusion will find they are guilty.
the808bass: “Anything they (the government interrogators) say is automatically false to you.”
Please don’t misinterpret my post. I wrote I didn’t trust them. I’m suspicious of anything they say or claim. That’s not the same thing, by a long shot, as writing everything they say is false.
I’ll believe them when they prove something to be true, not before.