that is abundantly clear with your every post.
Are you incapable of debating a legal issue without personal attacks? This speaks more of your intellectual horsepower than it does about me.
It’s simple, the law does not care about ethics and morals. The law deals with facts. We are a country of laws. Seems pretty basic. You cannot charge your neighbor with being a immoral and miserable person. There is no law against that. If you want to charge the FLDS, then present your charge and follow the rules. It’s really very simple. Part of the rules deals with evidence and how that evidence was gathered.
For example, I can not sneak into your home and search it for anything that is illegal. I cannot get a Search Warrant for Bubba’s garage to look for drugs, then find that he’s running a car chop shop. Any evidence I gather under the drug based Warrant is inadmissible. The warrant must match the evidence gathered.
In the case of the FLDS, we have a convicted criminal who’s phone number matches the phone records of the call that started it all. This would tend to make the original Search Warrant invalid. Thus, with an invalid Search Warrant - is any evidence gathered admissible in our court system?