Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Favors a 'League of Democracies'
AP ^ | 30 Apr 2008 | AP

Posted on 05/01/2008 3:50:27 PM PDT by BGHater

Republican presidential candidate John McCain envisions a "League of Democracies" as part of a more cooperative foreign policy with U.S. allies.

The Arizona senator will call for such an organization to be "the core of an international order of peace based on freedom" in a speech Tuesday at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif.

"We Americans must be willing to listen to the views and respect the collective will of our democratic allies," McCain says, according to excerpts his campaign provided. "Our great power does not mean we can do whatever we want whenever we want, nor should we assume we have all the wisdom, knowledge and resources necessary to succeed."

"To be a good leader, America must be a good ally," he adds in the speech, another in a series of policy addresses as he seeks the Republican presidential nomination.

Such comments offer a contrast to President Bush, who critics contend has employed a stubborn, go-it-alone foreign policy that has dramatically damaged the U.S. image abroad.

McCain is careful to note that his proposed multinational organization would not be like Woodrow Wilson's failed "League of Nations." Rather, McCain says the organization would be far more similar to what Theodore Roosevelt favored—a group of "like-minded nations working together in the cause of peace."

"It could act where the U.N. fails to act," McCain says.

Such a new body, he says, could help relieve suffering in Darfur, fight the AIDS epidemic in Africa, develop better environmental policies, and provide "unimpeded market access" to countries sharing "the values of economic and political freedom."

And, McCain adds, an organization of democracies could pressure tyrants "with or without Moscow's and Beijing's approval" and could "impose sanctions on Iran and thwart its nuclear ambitions" while helping struggling democracies succeed.

Recalling Harry S. Truman's actions during the Cold War, McCain also urges a similar "massive overhaul of the nation's foreign policy, defense and intelligence agencies" to meet the world's current challenges. He says details will come later.

(This version CORRECTS Corrects in graf 2 that Hoover Institution is at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif.)


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democracies; gop; league; leagueofdemocracies; mccain; mccainforeignpolicy; newglobalorder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
'Such a new body, he says, could help relieve suffering in Darfur, fight the AIDS epidemic in Africa, develop better environmental policies, and provide "unimpeded market access" to countries sharing "the values of economic and political freedom." '

Great, anyone know how much this is gonna cost?

1 posted on 05/01/2008 3:50:28 PM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater; Bender2

As long as elimination of the UN is part of the deal, have at it.


2 posted on 05/01/2008 3:52:05 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Headed, of course, by the League of Extraordinary Gentleman.

Oh. Sorry. Copyright infringement.


3 posted on 05/01/2008 3:52:12 PM PDT by alloysteel ("Why can't I just eat my waffle?" BHO, Jr, 's response to reporter's questions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: BGHater
Great. This guy wants to emulate Wilson and actually expand the role of Third World Countries in the conduct of US Foreign Policy! I'm not surprised.
5 posted on 05/01/2008 3:54:42 PM PDT by TCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Such a new body, he says, could help relieve suffering in Darfur, fight the AIDS epidemic in Africa, develop better environmental policies, and provide "unimpeded market access"

Woohoo! Global warming, too!

The Congressional Budget Office says current cap-and-trade legislation would amount to a $1.2 TRILLION tax hike on the American economy over the next ten years.

6 posted on 05/01/2008 3:57:25 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Wouldn’t it be nice if we ditched the worthless UN and joined with new democracies like Poland, the Czech Republic and the other freedom loving countries that used to make up the Soviet Union? Promote free trade with them instead of hostile regimes like China? Promote the cause of freedom to the oppressed peoples of the World?

Naaah! (/Steve Martin)


7 posted on 05/01/2008 3:58:17 PM PDT by BrewingFrog (I brew, therefore I am!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"We Americans must be willing to listen to the views and respect the collective will of our democratic allies,"

Pound sand, McCain.

8 posted on 05/01/2008 4:00:02 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle; TCats

You have it wrong. The League of Nations was like the UN an international body of sovereign states, not democracies. If a body of free democracies were to REPLACE the UN in our foreign policy concept, it would be a tremendous advancement. No longer would Communist tyrants from China and Russia have a say. It’s self evident that in such a potential body of democracies the USA would dominate.


9 posted on 05/01/2008 4:03:12 PM PDT by SolidWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

That’s great, but there aren’t any democracies.


10 posted on 05/01/2008 4:04:10 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

It’s a positive suggestion. The UN is a cancer, in most respects. Give its NYC HQ 4 years’ notice of eviction — it can relocate its HQ to Switzerland, where it already has a large campus — and use the NYC location for the new League of Free Nations.

Meanwhile, we don’t contribute another dime, and our only involvement in the UN will be to remain at the Security Council to veto any nonsense.


11 posted on 05/01/2008 4:04:23 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Aye, but he means democratic republics, and everyone pretty much understands what he means despite the misused term.


12 posted on 05/01/2008 4:05:15 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
League of Democracies" as part of a more cooperative foreign policy with U.S. allies.

We wouldn't be eligible, since we are not a democracy, let alone a Democracy. We are a representative republic. You'll not find the word Democracy, or any variant thereof, in the Constitution, which is after all what set up and defines our form of government.

13 posted on 05/01/2008 4:06:40 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Great. How much is Belgium going to contribute? (Nothing against Belgium in particular.) Many of the European democracies refuse to increase their contributions to NATO while insisting on setting the organizational agenda. A ‘League of Democracies’ would be little different.


14 posted on 05/01/2008 4:07:08 PM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Nice, huh? I don't have a whole lot of problem listening to allies, but I do have a problem when he implies that our ability will be (voluntarily) hampered as we look to the collective will.
"Our great power does not mean we can do whatever we want whenever we want..."

Right or wrong, we CAN do what we want!

15 posted on 05/01/2008 4:07:13 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Pound sand, McCain.

Words to live by.

16 posted on 05/01/2008 4:08:53 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

We expect straight talk from the Straight Talk Campaign, none of this ‘you know what I mean.’ He can do better.


17 posted on 05/01/2008 4:09:11 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
and provide "unimpeded market access"

Don't forget 'Free Traitorism'!

18 posted on 05/01/2008 4:11:52 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Great, anyone know how much this is gonna cost?

Your freedom and your time/money. Got a problem with it?

The Democrat is SO much worse, we must vote against them! /s

19 posted on 05/01/2008 4:15:27 PM PDT by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
McPain is just as dangerous as the OTHER TWO. He simply adds different ways to accomplish the destruction of America. It's just a matter of time when we'll see which way or ways takes precedent. WHY are we letting this happen? Please someone, tell me why we don't take the power back. However that might be accomplished. There are ways. No guts no glory. But if we're too lazy to study before we vote - if we even vote - then I suppose the other possibilities are out of the question.

So sad. It all started when “they” started referring to the USA as a democracy, which up to and including today, we are NOT. We are a Republic. I've spent much time here trying to interest people in the difference. Now I suggest you Google or Ask or what ever search engine blows your dress up. Maybe if you do the research yourselves it will mean more that someone attempting to educate you. It's not hard. I'd not understand it if it was. If I can read and understand what a Republic is and what part the citizenry is supposed to play Vs what a democracy is and that the citizenry doesn't have to do anything except sit back and let the government grow and grow. All anyone has to do is send in their money and let the government decide what you want and need and forget the rest. Rest, what you want to do with YOUR money, not have it spend on making us totally dependent of Pelosi or Reid or the whole “democratic” side of the aisle. We elect them to work for us. We hire them. Then they forget everything they say while trying to get elected and do virtually nothing - just spend our money on crap and then when we need to defend ourselves, they don't wanna. Vulnerable is a word we should all become very familiar with.

20 posted on 05/01/2008 4:19:12 PM PDT by Picklezz (Congressman HUNTER, many of us were counting on you being our President and saving America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson