The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet |
Maybe we are Gaia’s solution to the cycle of destructive glaciation.
GW Alarmists think the Average Global Temperature
(which is actually a meaningless statistic, unless you travel the globe constantly, and instantly)
should be a constant.
Earth and the Sun disagree.
That’s two to one, so the EARTH and SUN win.
We want more CO2!
A scientist stating an hypothesis, and an objective test that could disprove it — how last century! An example of right-brain thinking. He needs to get in touch with his feelings! More emoting, less thinking, or we're all doomed!
/s
The temperature peaked TEN years ago. It has been getting cooler since then.
The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet |
Actually raising atmospheric CO2 by about 1000% would violate OSHA safety standards, and might be deleterious to human health. At present rates of CO2 growth that might happen in 500 to 1000 years or so. Until then more CO2 will be a good thing. Al Gore needs to be put in a nice safe place where he can’t cause any more harm with his global warming delusions.
For instance, during a strong El Niño event, trillions of animals in the ocean die as the usual patterns of ocean temperature are disrupted. When Mother Nature does something like this it is considered natural. Yet, if humans were to do such a thing, it would be considered an environmental catastrophe. Does anyone else see something wrong with this picture?Great article!!! Dead on! Spencer is really a great spokesman for sanity in this area.
The view that nature was in some sort of preferred, yet fragile, state of balance before humans came along is arbitrary and philosophical — even religious. It is entirely possible that there are other, more preferable states of balance in nature which are more robust and less fragile than whatever the state of nature was before we came along.
You would think that science is the last place you would find such religious opinions, yet they dominate the worldview of scientists. Natural scientists tend to worship nature, and they then teach others to worship nature, too . . . all under the guise of “science.”
Like, wow.
bttt!
In a New Climate Model, Short-Term Cooling in a Warmer World
A Pastor's Influence (Obama's too vague about what attracted him to Wright in the first place.)
Buried Prejudice: The Bigot in Your Brain (barf alert) Psychology & politics, what a mix!
From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
Good column by the author.
Need to get his book!
Can you pay cash?
I remember learning all about the CO2/O2 cycle in grade school, many many years ago.
Plants use photosynthesis to extract carbon from CO2, and give off Oxygen in its usual form, O2.
Animals breath oxygen for energy, and exhale CO2, which the plants than use in turn.
It’s a CYCLE. And all cycles are either self-limiting or reinforcing, stable or unstable. Since this cycle has been around for millions of years, we can assume it is self-limiting and tends to return to its balance rather than oscillate out of control.
Gore and his cronies assume that if you add just a tiny bit to one side of the balance, it will oscillate out of control. That is just plain ludicrous, and it mystifies me that any scientist worthy of the name can say otherwise.
Or, no, it doesn’t really mystify me. Because the politicians and the politically correct establishment control the research grants, and most scientists know which side their bread is buttered on. Argue for global warming, and you will get promotions and grants. Argue against it, and you will lose your job.