Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NoGrayZone

That would be true if Rush was a good strategist. At least when planning for the was in Iraq, combat tested generals are put in charge and they prepare for everything, even the unexpected. Not everything will go according to plan all the time, but you don’t put people in charge of running a war who have never done it before, or who have secret agendas that could be detrimental to their country.

Rush is in no way a general or has had any experience in running campaigns. He is winging it as he goes along and is letting his hatred of McCain cloud his judgement. That’s not a good way to run a war.


149 posted on 04/28/2008 2:27:34 PM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: murron

“That would be true if Rush was a good strategist. At least when planning for the was in Iraq, combat tested generals are put in charge and they prepare for everything, even the unexpected.”

General George Casey was not a good strategist? I’m sure he was but NOT against something he never encountered before. Same with Petraeus, however, he had someone else’s “hindsite” on his side and used it wisely.

The war started in 2003, the surge wasn’t until 2007.

“Rush is in no way a general or has had any experience in running campaigns. “

Who’s campaign is Rush running?


167 posted on 04/28/2008 2:44:42 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (A Lesser Evil Is Still Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson