A more accurate description would have been Stalinists, not nazis, I agree.
...as far as IQ 60 stuff, we’ve seen ID proponents compared to radical Islam on this thread ALONE!
Granted, it never puts conservatives in a brilliant light, but it’s liberals who sometimes define the muck of “rules” we wallow in!
And the stuff IDers are called...well nazi is just run of the mill.
2 WRONGS DON’T MAKE A RIGHT...true enough, but let’s not pretend it’s a one-sided affair either!
I also find it fascinating to see how liberals react to their own tactics and/or logic.
Science, and even evolution, are not conservative/liberal things.
It has nothing to do with politics as long as its science. Gravity has nothing to do with liberals or conservatives, but it’s only a scientific theory, too.
Creationists are not radical islamics, although I don’t think that was really what they were called on this thread. I don’t see why there can’t be a respectiful disagreement.
People should be free to believe the earth is 6,000 years old, Noah’s Flood was worldwide and only 4,000 years ago, and dinosaurs are just something we don’t want to talk about.
Fine.
There is no need for religion and science to agree. The very rules of science prohibit it from getting into the religious realm. It passes no judgment on religion at all.
Religion observes no such restrictions, and it’s been proven incorrect on numerous counts and has retracted its positions.
This is way more of a religious/scientific debate than a conservative/liberal one. And there is no reason for it to be a religious debate. The facts are indeed the facts.