Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Steam Hybrids Using Waste Heat Recovery Could Reduce Fuel Consumption Up To 31.7%
www.greencarcongress.com ^ | 04/28/2008 | Staff

Posted on 04/28/2008 10:15:36 AM PDT by Red Badger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2008 10:17:07 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

2 posted on 04/28/2008 10:22:53 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I’d dearly love to have a Stanley Steamer made with modern materials and techniques.

Stainless steel, aluminium, carbon fibre, I’d drive one till the wheels fell off.


3 posted on 04/28/2008 10:27:17 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

When I was a kid (1960’s) the guy down the street had one, and he took it out for a spin pretty often. Very cool car.


4 posted on 04/28/2008 10:30:11 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Half an hour to heat the boiler and then off you go.


5 posted on 04/28/2008 10:30:42 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Steam Punk Ping!


6 posted on 04/28/2008 10:34:34 AM PDT by Clock King (The Oligarchy will make slaves of us all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It seems silly to me to start this process on passenger cars. The obvious candidate is an 18-Wheeler. The annual miles are huge and the cost of operation is critical (i.e. Cost savings would easily justify capital costs.)

There is also plenty of space for equipment to be mounted and actual APUs that need the power generated by the steam turbine.


7 posted on 04/28/2008 10:34:57 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (This is an Obama-nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

how bout these guys

http://www.scuderigroup.com/


8 posted on 04/28/2008 10:35:16 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

It’s not like I ever get in a great hurry anymore. A half hour one way or the other isn’t that bad.

Give me time for a cup of coffee or two.


9 posted on 04/28/2008 10:35:47 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive; t1b8zs

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1896537/posts?page=3


10 posted on 04/28/2008 10:38:35 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I worked for a real blacksmith back in the early 50s” (Yes he was a shoer of horses) We worked on trashing machines and other stuff...
He told me that once the energy folks got their heads out of their butts...steam power would become the most effecient power ava, he knew nothing about nuke power. I think it’s still true today.


11 posted on 04/28/2008 10:42:58 AM PDT by rusureitflies? (OSAMA BIN LADEN IS DEAD! There, I said it. Prove me wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; sionnsar; theDentist
The Stanley Steamer couldn’t compete with the gas burners because of its verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry slow startup.

Here, IF the weight an be kept down, and IF the enviro’s/baby-sitters in the DOE/DOT/OSHA in the government will permit the high pressure steam and boiler/waste heat recovery unit from being prohibited (in an accident, the steam WOULD break out and burn people) ...

Then the idea has merit.

We've used waste heat recovery in power gen gas turbines for a while. they now are about just about double what a regular gas turbine yields. (67% percent efficient compared to 37-40% in a once-through gas turbine. GT will yield more heat out (and a quick startup) compared to a boilers slow startup.

Better for long-haul though, NOT for 15 minute trips around town to the grocery store and to school. You'd need a while to heat up things and actually get the efficiency they are assuming.

12 posted on 04/28/2008 10:44:49 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
Stainless steel, aluminium, carbon fibre, I’d drive one till the wheels fell off.

Well, it's not that simple any more. We have learned a lot about the special problems of steam power production in the last 100 years.
The only way to be sure that it can run for 100,000 miles or more with minimum maintenance and downtime, is to run distilled water through the system

Another demand for external energy use totally ignored for now.

13 posted on 04/28/2008 10:59:20 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: t1b8zs
how bout these guys

http://www.scuderigroup.com/

That one is a Forehead slapper. Why didn't I think of that.

Split a 4 cycle engine with 1/2 the cylinders becoming a 2 cycle engine and the remaining cylinders becoming a supercharger, feeding into the 2 cycle engine.

14 posted on 04/28/2008 11:05:16 AM PDT by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

Right market!


15 posted on 04/28/2008 11:20:35 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

Use a closed loop and you could limit the necessity of refills of the boiler to the bare minimum. A simple heat exchanger on the back side to condense the steam back to liquid and send it back to the boiler would also increase water consumption efficiency. One wouldn’t even have to use water, there are other fluids that could be used in its place.

I’m certain there are technical details that would make it somewhat more complicated that that, but we’ve come a long, long way since the steam engine was in it’s heyday.

I don’t care what it takes as far as external fuel sources as long as I can afford it. Like the battery powered car you have to charge from the grid, I’m not one of the blind fools who thinks thats a zero emission vehicle. My interest in a steam powered car isn’t to “save the planet” or other any such asinine fantasy, I just like steam power.


16 posted on 04/28/2008 11:20:38 AM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg ("Shut the hell up, New York Times, you sanctimonious whining jerks!" - Craig Ferguson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Except the price of clean water skyrockets.


17 posted on 04/28/2008 11:22:54 AM PDT by OeOeO (Sic Transit Gloria Mundi... Gloria get me a beer,and hurry..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Decades ago, I was trained to ask one, simple question whenever someone tried to sell me on a steam-powered car.

Here's the question: how big is the condenser?

18 posted on 04/28/2008 11:25:35 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusureitflies?
steam power would become the most effecient power ava, he knew nothing about nuke power

Seems like steam is a big part of some nuke plants.

19 posted on 04/28/2008 11:29:30 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
I’d dearly love to have a Stanley Steamer made with modern materials and techniques. Stainless steel, aluminum, carbon fiber, I’d drive one till the wheels fell off.

You and me both buddy ! I've always been enamored the the Stanley Steamer.

I was especially impressed with their testing of each boiler before installation. Lower that 'puppy' into a big hole and push about 3-4 times the operating pressure into it. If it didn't blow up, it was good. COOL!

Those little babies got 25-30 MPG and were the fastest vehicles made at the time. What's not to love?

Nam Vet

20 posted on 04/28/2008 11:47:41 AM PDT by Nam Vet ("Erin Go Bragh", declares Democrat hopeful Barry Finnegan O'Bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson