Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tulane
Say what you want about Bush, but he has appointed 2 very good justices to the bench. I realize the vote was 6-3, but Roberts and Alito have been on the correct side most of the time...

You are absolutely correct!. Can you imagine the justices that Gore or Kerry would have appointed? That's why I'm keeping my 'broken-glass Republican' status and will hold my nose and vote for McCain in November. If we can get two more justices appointed, we just might be able to turn this country back from the liberal edge.

19 posted on 04/28/2008 7:30:51 AM PDT by BreitbartSentMe (Ex-Dem since 2001 *Folding@Home for the Gipper - Join the FReeper Folders*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Bush_Democrat
That's why I'm keeping my 'broken-glass Republican' status and will hold my nose and vote for McCain in November. If we can get two more justices appointed, we just might be able to turn this country back from the liberal edge.

McCain? Conservative SCOTUS justices? Approved by his liberal Democrat buddies? Bwa Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha............

25 posted on 04/28/2008 7:37:24 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bush_Democrat

McCain=Amnesty=Destruction of this country as we know it. If amnesty passes, it won’t matter who is appointed to the SCOTUS.


41 posted on 04/28/2008 7:50:20 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bush_Democrat
If we can get two more justices appointed, we just might be able to turn this country back from the liberal edge.

Agreed. Stevens is as old a dirt (even though he went the right way on this one), and Ginsberg is just holding on for a dem president. I think it's likely both of them will retire, either voluntarily or through God's will, in the next four years.

170 posted on 04/28/2008 3:16:30 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Bush_Democrat

Don’t count on it. All I need to consider is two pieces of evidence:

1. Shamnesty

2. McLame-Feingold’s unconstitutional campaign finance reform that was upheld. A huge mistake by Pres Bush to sign that piece of garbage, and a flat-wrong decision by the SCOTUS. What part of the Constitution did the Justices not read when deciding that case?

These are McCain’s advocacies. I’m not excited to see his justices.


223 posted on 04/29/2008 8:39:34 AM PDT by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson