Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Those oilsands are crankin' up, baby!
1 posted on 04/27/2008 4:56:14 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fanfan; GMMAC

PING!


2 posted on 04/27/2008 4:56:40 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I'm surprised the moonbats in Canada aren't screaming.
3 posted on 04/27/2008 5:02:38 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Watch what happens to the spot price of oil in tomorrow’s trading...should be interesting!


5 posted on 04/27/2008 5:05:39 PM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

If congress has it’s way they won’t be shipping one barrel of tar sands oil to the US much less 1 million.


8 posted on 04/27/2008 5:22:17 PM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

So am I seeing that it’s a lot faster to build an oil pipeline than a border fence?


9 posted on 04/27/2008 5:28:18 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

NAFTA needs to be stopped. It is killing America. sarc


14 posted on 04/27/2008 5:50:25 PM PDT by impimp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
Fine with me. Second, trans mountain pipe capacity and a tanker port like Karg Island sufficient to enable Canada to materially increase exports oil and gas by sea.

The first so that the petrol that I burn in my car would be produced from Alberta crude instead of overseas crude.

The second as a hedge so that we can divert our exports to the Pacific Rim in the event that the Democrats win in November and carry out their plan to uniaterally "renegotiate" NAFTA/

A unilateral "renegotiation" is just a euphamism for abrogating it. This would discharge Canada from performance of it and free us to sell our oil and gas to the highest bidder without regard to the constraints contained in NAFTA.

20 posted on 04/28/2008 4:55:45 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
OOPS, disregard my earlier reply. BAD FORMATTING. Substitute this:

Fine with me.

But I would like to see two other pipeline policies.

First, pipe capacity to enable eastern Canada to stop importing oil from overseas.

Second, trans mountain pipe capacity and a tanker port like Karg Island sufficient to enable Canada to materially increase exports oil and gas by sea.

The first so that the petrol that I burn in my car would be produced from Alberta crude instead of overseas crude.

The second as a hedge so that we can divert our exports to the Pacific Rim in the event that the Democrats win in November and carry out their plan to uniaterally "renegotiate" NAFTA.

A unilateral "renegotiation" is just a euphamism for abrogating it. This would discharge Canada from performance of it and free us to sell our oil and gas to the highest bidder without regard to the constraints contained in NAFTA.

21 posted on 04/28/2008 4:58:25 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson