To: LJayne
Read my post again. My point is that most people can understand English and we know what the Reverend Wright said.
I asked you, are you a Reverend Wright apologist? Did you sign up on here to defend the racist?
7 posted on
04/26/2008 7:11:42 PM PDT by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: caver
Is English YOUR first language? I’m trying to figure what you don’t like about the post from Hewitt’s web site.
Why are you busting ugly on the poster?
12 posted on
04/26/2008 7:16:33 PM PDT by
don-o
(My son, Ben, reports to Parris Island on June 30.)
To: caver
Lay off LJayne. You are reading Hugh Hewitt’s words and taking issue with them. LJayne was just posting Hewitt’s words. Take issue with Hewitt if you want, or if you think
that makes sense. And we’re all too familiar with the “gotcha, Newbie” type of aggression we see in your post. Do your homework before you go after someone.
13 posted on
04/26/2008 7:32:22 PM PDT by
supremedoctrine
("Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see" --Schopenhauer)
To: caver
Get a grip. This is a valid and topical post. Lay off the poster. Sometimes it’s better to read the article before getting square in someone’s face.
Ya gonna bust my chops cause I’ve only been around since 2001?
16 posted on
04/26/2008 8:08:16 PM PDT by
ExpatGator
(Extending logic since 1961.)
To: caver
are you on drugs? all he/she did was post an article. Why are you being rude?
21 posted on
04/26/2008 9:05:20 PM PDT by
libbylu
(Bitter, typical white person)
To: caver; DugwayDuke
My point is that most people can understand English and we know what the Reverend Wright said. (caver)
Yes, but what's the likelihood that Wright's own congregants can understand English, and therefore know what he said? ;-)
So, you see, Ingram didnt read all of the sermon and you havent read Wrights five books so you dont have the context or the qualifications to discuss this. (DugwayDuke)
What's the likehood that Wright's congregants can read five books (or, rather, read ... period) and therefore can understand the context. ;-)
Ok, seriously now ... Wright is a problem-profiteering (per the Booker T. Washington definition, ref: his nice big new McMansion) demagague. My guess is that Wright's own congregation doesn't bother to listen to a fraction of what he spews. They just get caught up in/seduced by all the animated oratory, theatrics, etc associated with his sermons. Sort of like how many Germans responded to Hitler's speeches back in the 30ths, without having read Mein Kampf (note: I am in no way drawing any sort of moral or scope comparison between true evil like Hitler and the Nazis and two-bit carnival barkers like Wright - just using the well-known example of the Nurnberg rallies to illustrate my point)
One neat thing that Hannity or someone could do is one of those "man on the street" interview series where they stand outside of Wright's church and try to see if the congregants could answer questions about the content of what they just heard.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson