Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Farm bill boosts nutrition and cuts ethanol credit
http://www.reuters.com ^ | 4-25-08 | By Charles Abbott

Posted on 04/26/2008 5:15:23 PM PDT by NoLibZone

Farm bill boosts nutrition and cuts ethanol credit Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:02pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The new U.S. farm law would reduce the tax credit for corn-based ethanol while giving nutrition programs such as food stamps a $10.4 billion increase, House and Senate negotiators said on Friday.

"A significant increase in nutrition is really required by what is happening in the market," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, one of the negotiators. "It is ... a reflection of reality."

Sen. Tom Harkin, an Iowa Democrat, who oversees the negotiations, said a tentative agreement on the omnibus $600 billion bill was within reach now that revenues were identified to pay for a $10 billion spending increase.

Food prices are forecast to rise by 4 percent this year, the same as in 2007. High food price inflation is forecast for two more years. Antihunger groups say food stamp benefits have lost 5 percent of their purchasing power since last summer.

In talks this week, negotiators added nearly $900 million to nutrition programs from an earlier agreement for a $9.5 billion increase over 10 years. Land stewardship programs would gain $4 billion, specialty crops $1.35 billion and biofuel development $900 million.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and New York Democrat Charles Rangel, chairman of the House tax committee, insisted on more nutrition funding to offset the $361 million cost of tax breaks to timber companies and owners of racehorses.

The 51-cent-a-gallon tax credit for corn-based ethanol would drop to 45 cents, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, said in describing the ongoing discussions. The Minnesota Democrat said a tax credit would be created for ethanol derived from cellulose, found in grasses, woody plants and crop debris.

"This is what the country wants," Peterson said, referring to development of cellulosic ethanol. Livestock groups say rapid growth of the corn-based ethanol industry is driving up feed costs and rippling through to higher grocery prices.

A Senate Finance Committee proposal called for a production tax credit of up to $1.01 a gallon for cellulosic ethanol, ending on December 31, 2012. The infant industry is moving toward commercial-scale plants.

A proposal to extend biodiesel credits through 2009 was dropped from the farm bill, two negotiators said. Instead, it would become part of an "extender" tax bill later this year.

With approval of the timber and racehorse tax breaks, negotiators will have to cut about $1 billion from commodity supports, up from the earlier goal of $730 million.

Still to be decided were tighter rules on crop subsidies and whether to increase crop subsidy rates for wheat and soybeans.

A small cut might be made in the so-called direct payments that guarantee $5.2 billion a year to grain, cotton and soybean growers, a small-farm advocate said.

Also on Friday, President George W. Bush signed a bill that effectively gives Congress until May 2 to complete work on the farm law.

Meeting privately, negotiators agreed on Thursday to rely on customs user fees -- funds collected on imported goods -- to pay for the farm bill spending increase. That resolved a major objection from the White House on how to pay for the bill.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cornprices; ethanol

1 posted on 04/26/2008 5:15:24 PM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; CygnusXI; Beowulf

ethanol ping


2 posted on 04/26/2008 5:18:54 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Could it be the morons in DC are starting to pay attention to food prices?


3 posted on 04/26/2008 5:19:48 PM PDT by DogBarkTree (The correct word isn't "immigrant" when what they are doing is "invading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree
This is a major fuster-cluck.

Didn't any of these assholes pay attention to the Carter energy fiasco in the 1970s?

Get the government out of the way, and let the free market sort out the mess created by the government.

4 posted on 04/26/2008 5:25:35 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Wait just a darn moment, tax breaks for wealthy horse owners?


5 posted on 04/26/2008 5:26:21 PM PDT by benjamin032
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: benjamin032
It's the "race horse" thing that caught my eye.

Unless they're retired into steaks, I'd like to know who the heck got donations to throw that in there...

6 posted on 04/26/2008 5:36:44 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Why, with commodity prices where they are, is there any need for a “farm bill”? Surely we’re still not worried about family farms are we?


7 posted on 04/26/2008 5:37:30 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; Red Badger
Pork Barrel Ping...
8 posted on 04/26/2008 5:57:06 PM PDT by tubebender (and just like that I lost another tag line to Glock Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Harkin up for reelection?


9 posted on 04/26/2008 6:02:24 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Shouldn't the libs love a Hunter Thompson ticket in 08?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
"Antihunger groups say food stamp benefits have lost 5 percent of their purchasing power since last summer.

HA....from what I see of food stamp users they could stand to lose 5% of their body weight....so losing 5% of purchasing power would be a HEALTHY THING.

10 posted on 04/26/2008 6:37:32 PM PDT by goodnesswins (20 is the new 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
The 51-cent-a-gallon tax credit for corn-based ethanol would drop to 45 cents, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson, said in describing the ongoing discussions. The Minnesota Democrat said a tax credit would be created for ethanol derived from cellulose, found in grasses, woody plants and crop debris.

"This is what the country wants," Peterson said, referring to development of cellulosic ethanol. Livestock groups say rapid growth of the corn-based ethanol industry is driving up feed costs and rippling through to higher grocery prices.

A Senate Finance Committee proposal called for a production tax credit of up to $1.01 a gallon for cellulosic ethanol, ending on December 31, 2012. The infant industry is moving toward commercial-scale plants.

What a crock, the lobbyist tell these clowns, on Capitol hill, to squat and they say how much sir.

Ethanol should not get a dime area credit is pissing money away.

11 posted on 04/26/2008 6:44:16 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

So the Dems jack up food stamps in the Ag bill (feeding programs make up the bulk...no pun intended...of the Ag budget now) so that the US taxpayers will pay the soaring cost for food caused by the Dems’ mandating ethanol production. Being a liberal means you never admit your blunders, and you always make someone else pay for them.


12 posted on 04/26/2008 7:18:47 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Don’t worry, soon everyone will need food stamps. Maybe then they will be happy.


13 posted on 04/26/2008 7:28:15 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
"This is what the country wants," Peterson said, referring to development of cellulosic ethanol.

No, Peterson, it isn't. Drill ANWR, drill the gulf. That is what the country wants.

14 posted on 04/26/2008 8:20:27 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

Food Stamps should never have been a part of the Farm Program. They should be under the Welfare programs


15 posted on 04/26/2008 8:46:02 PM PDT by South Texas Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: South Texas Lady
Food Stamps should never have been a part of the Farm Program. They should be under the Welfare programs

Well there's what makes sense, and there's political reality. The food stamp lobby puts these provisions in the farm bill so they can get support from farm groups and trade associations. As you no doubt know, farmers tend to frown on the welfare state. Anyone who wants their support for some govt handout is best off not putting the appropriation in a welfare bill.

16 posted on 04/26/2008 9:04:45 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson