Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AUDIO: Alan Keyes Constitution Party National Convention Speech (This Rocks)
Alan Keyes Archives ^ | April 25, 2008

Posted on 04/25/2008 10:36:59 PM PDT by Kurt Evans

The link to audio of the speech is reproduced in post #2.

It's 22 minutes long.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; alankeyes; baldwin; chuckbaldwin; constitution; constitutionparty; cp; dempartytroll; elections; howardphillips; huckabee; huckaboob; keyes; laughterfromtheleft; paul; phillips; ronpaul; sorosatwork; stassen4president; thirdparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last


1 posted on 04/25/2008 10:37:01 PM PDT by Kurt Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

http://archives.alankeyes.com/play.php?mp3=222


2 posted on 04/25/2008 10:37:23 PM PDT by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

First you’re for Huckabee, and now Alan Keyes and the Constitution Party?
You are quite the operator, aren’t you..?


3 posted on 04/25/2008 10:40:53 PM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

What’s weird about going from Huckabee to Keyes? Although, Huckabee at least had a shred of a chance....


4 posted on 04/25/2008 10:48:36 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aria; Kurt Evans

When Kurt Evans (if that is his real name) was shilling for Huckabee, Huckabee had already no chance of winning, and was doing nothing but sabotaging Mitt Romney, clearing the way for McCain. There was no other logical outcome.

Now that McCain is the nominee due to Huckabee’s efforts, Mr. Evans suddenly is for Alan Keyes, trying to lead people like a pied piper away from the GOP completely and to the Constitution Party. The net result, if people were to follow his lead would be Obama as the next President. There is no other logical outcome. Kurt’s actions have either been calculated, or out of abject stupidity. It can only be one or the other.


5 posted on 04/25/2008 11:01:47 PM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aria

I heard that both of the people in the crowd gave him a standing ovation.


6 posted on 04/25/2008 11:02:35 PM PDT by Soliton (McCain couldn't even win a McCain look-alike contest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch; Aria; Kurt Evans; EternalVigilance; The Mayor; trooprally; Just A Nobody

There are more—and more honorable—reasons than your either/or scenario.

Some are dismayed to the point of abhorrance at the Gramscian sabotage and sullying within the GOP leadership, whether your personal key issues are fiscal and/or Biblical (’SoCon’) reasons.

I believe it better to throw the usurpers and corrupters out than to abandon the GOP. Others believe otherwise but not all are stupid, or smart shills. In this case, dissent is not unpatriotic.

I agree with Keyes’ stated principles but not his strategies, as I’ve said elsewhere.

I wish more Conservatives would understand and stand ardently for the principles Keyes advocates.


7 posted on 04/25/2008 11:12:56 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Ah ha....I see what you’re saying.

Well Keyes effect on this election will be nil - no matter what anyone says.


8 posted on 04/25/2008 11:25:37 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Kurt's actions have either been calculated, or out of abject stupidity. It can only be one or the other.

I believe the most dangerous candidates for president in this cycle were (1) Romney, (2) McCain, (3) Obama and (4) Clinton. It admittedly took me some time to figure out that Giuliani wasn't a serious threat, and I didn't become convinced Romney was an egomaniacal fraud until the Reagan library debate.

The critical difference between a liberal Democrat president and a liberal Republican president is that the Democrat would face substantial congressional opposition. Congressional Republicans have already begun rolling over for McCain's liberalism.
9 posted on 04/25/2008 11:51:18 PM PDT by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Soliton; Aria

10 posted on 04/26/2008 12:05:30 AM PDT by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

So how much is Soros going to contribute to Alan Keyes For President election fund?


11 posted on 04/26/2008 12:07:02 AM PDT by Antonio C (God bless John McCain, George W. Bush, and our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bump for later reading


12 posted on 04/26/2008 12:23:09 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans
I believe the most dangerous candidates for president in this cycle were (1) Romney, (2) McCain, (3) Obama and (4) Clinton.
Those are the only 4 candidates that were viable. So you admit, your order of preference in this presidential race has been:

1) Clinton
2) Obama
3) McCain
4) Romney

You sir, stand in stark contrast to our values here on FR.
You are the polar opposite of everything we stand for.
Take a look, fellow FReepers, before you waste any more time giving trolls like this an opportunity to lead you further astray.
 
13 posted on 04/26/2008 12:33:22 AM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance

Any other reasons you may claim are neither realistic or practical.
We go to the polls with the candidate we have, not the candidate we wish we had.
Elections are about either/or, choosing one or the other, not “none of the above”.
Elections are pragmatic things.
Elections are about confronting reality, with realistic options.

The reality is this election is McCain vs. Obama, Republican vs. Democrat. Period.
McCain may not be your perfect definition of “conservative”, but he is still the most conservative person at this juncture capable of being sworn in to office on January 20, 2009. That is the reality.

The Democrats have been so successful where Republicans have not because Democrats take every opportunity to advance their agenda, no matter how small it is. And they give no quarter to Republicans to advance their agenda on any front. The Democrats are the Palestinians of American politics.

You can speak in hyperbolic terms about McCain advancing the Democrats’ agenda, but no matter how much that even may be true, he will not advance it an iota of what Obama would. Even if we lose some ground in some areas with McCain, it is not nearly what we would lose with Obama, and those are the two choices we are faced with, and no others.

If McCain displeases us as president, then in 2012 we nominate someone else, and be thankful that at least it wasn’t President Obama during those 4 years.


14 posted on 04/26/2008 12:49:25 AM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans

Excellent speech, Kurt Evans. Thanks for posting it!


15 posted on 04/26/2008 12:49:48 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
If McCain displeases us as president, then in 2012 we nominate someone else, and be thankful that at least it wasn’t President Obama during those 4 years.

What do you mean, if??? McCain displeases most of us as a Senator...He'll be a disaster as a President...

You liberal Republicans have forced us into accepting one of your liberal Republican candidates for President...

You guys deserve an 'Obama'...

16 posted on 04/26/2008 12:56:48 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kurt Evans
The critical difference between a liberal Democrat president and a liberal Republican president is that the Democrat would face substantial congressional opposition. Congressional Republicans have already begun rolling over for McCain's liberalism.

That is very well said Kurt Evans.

While I was sympathetic to your cause in Huckabee, as a Reagan Conservative, I could not stand with you. In your support of Keyes however, I am happy to stand with you, and I welcome your not inconsiderable talents and zeal- For in Keyes you see, we can all find common ground, just like you and I.

Far be it from anyone here to cast aspersions upon a Reagan Conservative such as Dr. Keyes. They belittle him out of the fear of what he, and his supporters represent. If he does win the CP nomination, it can well mean the end of the Republican hopes this year. McCain's support is a mile wide and an inch deep. If one merely gets the ball rolling, I can well imagine wholesale abandonment of the Republicans altogether. My, what a wrench that would cast into the well-oiled machinery of the Globalists, not to mention D.C. itself.

17 posted on 04/26/2008 1:03:45 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Antonio C
So how much is Soros going to contribute to Alan Keyes For President election fund?

How much money did Soros contribute to McCain's foundation?
18 posted on 04/26/2008 1:06:04 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Antonio C
So how much is Soros going to contribute to Alan Keyes For President election fund?

Why, Are you worried it might be more than he has already contributed to McCain?

19 posted on 04/26/2008 1:08:28 AM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

ping


20 posted on 04/26/2008 1:09:19 AM PDT by QBFimi2 (Ve are the New World Order; ve bring to the world dis-order. Spike Jones, 1943.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson