Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI wants widespread monitoring of 'illegal' Internet activity
C Net News ^ | April 23, 2008 | Anne Broache

Posted on 04/25/2008 4:59:19 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

The FBI on Wednesday called for new legislation that would allow federal police to monitor the Internet for "illegal activity."

The suggestion from FBI Director Robert Mueller, which came during a House of Representatives Judiciary Committee hearing, appears to go beyond a current plan to monitor traffic on federal-government networks. Mueller seemed to suggest that the bureau should have a broad "omnibus" authority to conduct monitoring and surveillance of private-sector networks as well.

The surveillance should include all Internet traffic, Mueller said, "whether it be .mil, .gov, .com--whichever network you're talking about." (See the transcript of the hearing.)

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: fbi; internet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/25/2008 4:59:20 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Stay off of MY network!


2 posted on 04/25/2008 5:00:28 PM PDT by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

...

I always assumed they had this ability already. Apparently I was mistaken.


3 posted on 04/25/2008 5:00:55 PM PDT by TheZMan (What is happening to Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks; Extremely Extreme Extremist; fieldmarshaldj; ExTexasRedhead; neverdem; ProCivitas; ...

“the bureau should have a broad “omnibus” authority to conduct monitoring and surveillance of private-sector networks as well.

The surveillance should include all Internet traffic, Mueller said”

This is nothing less than ominous. It must be stopped at all costs.


4 posted on 04/25/2008 5:02:49 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Karl Marx supported free trade. Does that make him a free market conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan

ability to read is one thing.

this is the FBI the are about collecting admissible evidence. Inteligence does not worry about the courts.

these are the same buffoons who needed back doors to be able to tap digital cell phones.


5 posted on 04/25/2008 5:04:00 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4; Jim Robinson

“Stay off of MY network!”

Hopefully, a whole range of voices will shout that.


6 posted on 04/25/2008 5:04:40 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Karl Marx supported free trade. Does that make him a free market conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The Bush Justice Department ain’t got the balls to do anything good with this.


7 posted on 04/25/2008 5:08:03 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

outsourcing American jobs to China, insourcing the Chinese police state to America.


8 posted on 04/25/2008 5:09:41 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Lovely.


9 posted on 04/25/2008 5:10:17 PM PDT by Zeon Cowboy (Pardon Ramos and Compean NOW! // Worst. Election. Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Imagine the FBI having these powers in a Obama or Clinton presidency.

/shudder

10 posted on 04/25/2008 5:11:06 PM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeafoodGumbo; wideawake; wagglebee

“Imagine the FBI having these powers in a Obama or Clinton presidency.”

That really is cause to shudder.


11 posted on 04/25/2008 5:15:10 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Karl Marx supported free trade. Does that make him a free market conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

bump


12 posted on 04/25/2008 5:21:38 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I can't wait to see what he stands for." - Susan Sarandon on her support of Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

If it’s so scary why don’t they just turn the darn thing off!?


13 posted on 04/25/2008 5:25:19 PM PDT by The Louiswu (Just say NO... to Hillary and O'Bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan
I always assumed they had this ability already. Apparently I was mistaken.

I too assumed they could do this. I don't really understand why they can't snoop the internet forums and the like. Emails and private chats, I'd assume would or should be off limits.

14 posted on 04/25/2008 5:27:24 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu

Turning off the computer limits one’s access to information that they couldn’t find elsewhere.


15 posted on 04/25/2008 5:28:45 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Karl Marx supported free trade. Does that make him a free market conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.
O'Brien


16 posted on 04/25/2008 5:39:33 PM PDT by DryFly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The FBI already has the capability to monitor private internet traffic as does the NSA. However, they lack the permission to do so legally without a court order. Now, they want to monitor freely without constitutional protections such as free from unreasonable search.

Amendment IV: Warrants and searches.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Google - Combating Terrorism Act of 2001 sponsored by Orrin Hatch (R-Utah)

“The FBI has since created a network of links and electronic hubs for collection purposes amongst the nation’s largest telecom carriers and internet providers “and about 40 FBI offices and Quantico, according to interviews and documents describing the agency’s Digital Collection System,” according to the Washington Post.

These revelations mirror those of AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein, who revealed that the super secretive National Security Agency had been given access by AT&T management to install “splitters” for the Agency hard-wired to an NSA “secure” room in the company’s central office in San Francisco. According to Klein,

“In short, an exact copy of all internet traffic that flowed through critical AT&T cables—emails, documents, pictures, web browsing, Voice over-internet phone conservations, everything—was being diverted to equipment inside the secret room. In addition the documents reveal the technological gear used in their secret project, including a highly sophisticated search component capable of quickly sifting through huge amounts of digital data (including text, voice and images) in real time according to pre-programmed criteria.

It’s important to understand that the internet links which were connected to the splitter contained not just foreign communications but vast amounts of domestic traffic, all mixed together. Furthermore, the splitter has no selective abilities—it’s just a dumb device which copies everything to the secret room. And the links going through the splitter are AT&T’s physical connections to many other internet providers (e.g., Sprint, Qwest, Global Crossing, Cable & Wireless, and the critical West Coast Internet Exchange Point known as Mae West). Since these networks are interconnected, the government surveillance affects not only AT&T customers but everyone else—millions of Americans.

I also discovered in my conversations with other technicians that other “secret rooms” were established in Seattle, San Jose, Los Angeles and San Diego. One of the documents I obtained also mentions Atlanta, and the clear inference in the logic of this setup, and the language of the documents, is that there are other such rooms across the country to complete the coverage—possibly 15 to 20 or more.” (Mark Klein, “Reject Amnesty for Telecoms,” Electronic Frontier Foundation)

As a key networking hub of the national security state’s electronic driftnet, the “Quantico circuit” enables the FBI and their CIA and NSA partners in crime to literally target any one or any group with highly-intrusive and silent monitoring of all electronic communications. Under the Bush administration’s repressive “public-private” police state architecture, privacy rights join Geneva Convention prohibitions against torture as yet another “quaint” notion, a “phantom of lost liberty,” in the memorable phrase uttered by former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft in 2001.”


17 posted on 04/25/2008 5:45:43 PM PDT by ktime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot; B4Ranch; Harvey105; joanie-f

Many—perhaps most—agencies of the federal government can no longer be trusted, including especially the FBI, CIA and ATF. Accordingly, I am completely opposed to giving them any more powers. All of them need far more oversight to ensure our constitutional rights are protected.


18 posted on 04/25/2008 5:53:21 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
That really is cause to shudder.

Imagine that this photo is really in 2009.

19 posted on 04/25/2008 5:54:51 PM PDT by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I don’t support this under any administration. Get a warrant.


20 posted on 04/25/2008 5:55:35 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson