1 posted on
04/25/2008 1:51:46 PM PDT by
dbehsman
To: dbehsman
The difference is corporations are artificial persons. They are not the same as natural persons. To imply they have the same status in all respects is absurd.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2 posted on
04/25/2008 2:01:03 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: dbehsman
4 posted on
04/25/2008 2:18:57 PM PDT by
groanup
(Politics, dog ticks, wood ticks and bed ticks. They're all parasites.)
To: dbehsman
"Corporate interests don't override the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens."Sure they do. Corporations override our 4th amendment rights when they test for off-site use of drugs, alcohol, or smoking.
To: dbehsman
From the article:
"NRA believes in private property rights, but unlike citizens, corporations are discretionary creations of government. " I am so delighted to see this perspective gaining traction. We the people, through our legislatures, have created corporations to benefit all of us. This artificial creation should not be the instrument for denying us the right to defend ourselves.
6 posted on
04/25/2008 2:58:13 PM PDT by
William Tell
(RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson