Skip to comments.
T. Rex Confirmed As Great Grandaddy Of All Birds
New Scientist ^
| 4-24-2008
| Ewen Callaway
Posted on 04/24/2008 1:37:14 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
04/24/2008 1:37:15 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
2
posted on
04/24/2008 1:38:53 PM PDT
by
shineon
To: blam
That's why I wear a Tin Hat!........
3
posted on
04/24/2008 1:39:20 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: shineon
I’m sure glad they downsized. I’d hate to having something like that poop on windshield.
To: blam
5
posted on
04/24/2008 1:44:13 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: blam
“T. rex confirmed as great granddaddy of all birds”
That is not what was stated in the article at all. Not to mention the glaring errors that were even mentioned in the article.
If these last two articles are any kind of example of “New Science”, it leaves a great deal to be desired.
6
posted on
04/24/2008 1:44:15 PM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
To: blam
Forget the protein analysis. Just cook it and see what it tastes like.
(You think that's what they actually did?)
7
posted on
04/24/2008 1:44:27 PM PDT
by
thulldud
(Insanity: Electing John McCain again and expecting a different result.)
To: blam
According to Jurassic Park, T-Rex's eat lawyers.
I say it's time to feed the pigeons.
8
posted on
04/24/2008 1:45:51 PM PDT
by
Question Liberal Authority
(There's more proof that Operation Chaos is working than there is proof that Global Warming is real.)
To: blam
9
posted on
04/24/2008 1:47:34 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: blam
10
posted on
04/24/2008 1:49:07 PM PDT
by
mysterio
To: blam
INTREP - has anyone bothered to examine the pulmonary systems of T-Rex and birds? They are totally different.
11
posted on
04/24/2008 1:52:53 PM PDT
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: shineon
Easy to believe if you’ve ever watched Hitchcock’s “The Birds”.
12
posted on
04/24/2008 1:53:31 PM PDT
by
DManA
To: blam
Explains a lot.
13
posted on
04/24/2008 1:54:31 PM PDT
by
Fido969
("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
To: blam
Dinasaurs were close to birds - that isn’t news - but it is unlikely that a T-Rex was the ancestor of any living thing, as this headline implies.
To: Red Badger
15
posted on
04/24/2008 1:59:38 PM PDT
by
spanalot
To: pissant
I see your BS and raise you a Horsesh_t.
To: blam
T. Rex was granddaddy of the Byrds?
To: blam
What nonsense.
After 2 centuries of unearthing fossils, we have a pretty complete picture of the dinosaur fauna, give or take some outliers.
Surely if this were true one could assemble a credible, date-verified progression of fossils showing evolution from this prehistoric giant to feather-covered, hollow-skulled birds.
But, alas! Nothing even close.
18
posted on
04/24/2008 2:09:22 PM PDT
by
Elpasser
To: Question Liberal Authority
Just recalling the scene of the lawyer taking a dump getting eaten by the T-Rex gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling.
19
posted on
04/24/2008 2:12:01 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
((Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud))
To: L98Fiero
If these last two articles are any kind of example of New Science, it leaves a great deal to be desired.It wouldn't open for me. I forgot that I put newscientist in my hosts file months ago, and clicked the link without checking it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson