1 posted on
04/22/2008 3:52:14 PM PDT by
mdittmar
To: mdittmar
2 posted on
04/22/2008 3:53:15 PM PDT by
Shermy
(These are the waffles we have been waiting for)
To: mdittmar
How hard is it to build a 30 foot tall fence and then just shoot them if they try to come over the fence?
3 posted on
04/22/2008 3:55:49 PM PDT by
texgal
(end no-fault divorce laws return DUE PROCESS & EQUAL PROTECTION to ALL citizens))
To: mdittmar
“Officials say the government will replace its highly touted “virtual fence” on the Arizona-Mexico border with new towers, radars, cameras and computer software.”
And what is that(”new towers, radars, cameras and computer software”) but another version of a virtual fence?
Put up a real, non-virtual fence.
4 posted on
04/22/2008 3:59:29 PM PDT by
Will88
To: mdittmar
Critics say the system is highly flawed, but officials say it’s only a demonstration project.
It sure demonstrates to me why we need a real fence.
6 posted on
04/22/2008 4:08:06 PM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(It's too bad I've already promised myself to never vote for McCain.)
To: mdittmar
what is so hard to figure out about A FREAKING FENCE!!!! It's a physical barrier against intrusion. It's a symbolic effort to re-establish the sovereignty of the USA.
7 posted on
04/22/2008 4:12:50 PM PDT by
bpjam
(Drill For Oil or Lose Your Job!! Vote Nov 3, 2008)
To: mdittmar
Is this the first time the gummint has admitted it made a mistake? Is this the first time a gummint program has been abolished?
Probably not, but it sometimes seems like it.
8 posted on
04/22/2008 4:16:25 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: mdittmar
“They're scrapping the brand-new $20 million system because it doesn't work sufficiently.”
That sounds promising. It actually sounds like they really care.
10 posted on
04/22/2008 4:24:16 PM PDT by
bilhosty
To: mdittmar; HiJinx; gubamyster
How about they try a REAL fence?
Virtual fences are only meant to gull virtual idiots.
15 posted on
04/22/2008 4:36:15 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: mdittmar
I think scrapping the virtual fence is stupid toounless there is a lot of redundant camera coverage ncorporated into the real fence.
Smugglers and terrorists are determined and it is going to take a WELL OBSERVED barrier to stop these folks.
16 posted on
04/22/2008 4:37:10 PM PDT by
GulfBreeze
(McCain is our nominee. Yeah... I guess.)
To: mdittmar
We've seen all this before. If my freeper memory serves me right, it's called
adverse possession. It won't be long before some half-wit World Court Judge will be giving Mexico a wink and telling us we gave up our right to the border when we refused to put up a fence. And then of course there'll be the foot paths crossing the property....
17 posted on
04/22/2008 4:53:16 PM PDT by
Brucifer
(G. W. Bush "The dog ate my copy of the Constitution.")
To: mdittmar
They're scrapping the brand-new $20 million system because it doesn't work sufficiently. Bah... chicken feed... What's $20 million these days?
Sometimes I just don't know whether to **** or go blind! I'll never have $20 million to throw around -- let alone throw away -- in my entire life, but the gubbermint?
Hey! It's not OUR money!!!
Excuse me, I feel the need to go bang my head against the wall for a while.
18 posted on
04/22/2008 5:14:24 PM PDT by
Ronin
(Bushed out!!! Another tragic victim of BDS.)
To: mdittmar
The Virtual Fence To Be Replaced With Chalkline!
Much better title available!
19 posted on
04/22/2008 5:26:34 PM PDT by
Randy Larsen
(Arrogance IS my virtue!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson