Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F-117 is leaving the same way it arrived -- stealthily
LA Times ^ | April 22, 2008 | Peter Pae

Posted on 04/22/2008 11:08:48 AM PDT by jazusamo

The Air Force and Lockheed Martin are giving a secret retirement send-off to the world's first radar-evading fighter.

They were born shrouded in mystery in a windowless building in Burbank. They flew combat missions over Serbia and Iraq virtually invisible to enemy radar. And today, the black, bat-like F-117A Night Hawks will fly quietly into the night as stealthily as they came.

The last four of the world's first stealth fighters will make their final flights from Palmdale to a secret desert base in Nevada, where they will be locked up indefinitely in a secure concrete hangar.

But unlike the passing of other notable planes, there will be no public fanfare or farewell for these mysterious aircraft that revolutionized aerial warfare. The F-117 is still so cloaked in secrecy that only employees and retirees who worked on the program can attend its retirement ceremony at Lockheed Martin Corp.'s Skunk Works plant in Palmdale. A few aerospace reporters have been invited, but they had to be U.S. citizens.

"Some aspects of the plane are still classified," said Dianne Knippel, spokeswoman for Lockheed, whose legendary Skunk Works design house, formerly in Burbank and now in Palmdale, developed and built the aircraft.

The hushed send-off is no surprise to aviation buffs and historians who have followed one of the nation's most secretive aircraft programs since the Pentagon covertly launched it more than 30 years ago.

"It reflects a hyper-security culture that has accompanied this thing since the beginning," said John Pike, a defense policy analyst with . "It's the nation's first stealth technology, and as a result you might imagine all the caution with security."

The single-seat F-117 was the first plane that could evade radar detection; it was designed to fly into heavily defended areas to knock out radar installations and anti-aircraft missile...

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f117; looselips; militaryadvantage; nationalsecurity; skunkworkpropaganda; stealth; victorythruairpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: jazusamo
I doubt we’ll ever see another work horse like the B-52.

Amazing planes. I worked on B52Gs at Barksdale.

81 posted on 04/22/2008 1:05:05 PM PDT by OSHA (framing it as though you've magically neutralized any potential negative eventuality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

The BUFF. When it absolutely, positively has to be delivered (in great quantities).


82 posted on 04/22/2008 1:07:02 PM PDT by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

The lease from the aliens was up, so they have to return them.


83 posted on 04/22/2008 1:10:36 PM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
I haven't been there since it was opened. There was only the original building as I recall. I noticed from their web page that there are now three buildings? The B-36 is in the original building.

I remember when they towed aircraft from Area A and the old museum (in Fairborn) including the XB-70.

I did drive by in the 1980s and I did not see the XB-70 sitting outside. There were one or two B-52s outside at that time.

84 posted on 04/22/2008 1:15:14 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ishmac; technically right

The F-117 has been detectable by low band search radar since day one.


85 posted on 04/22/2008 1:15:20 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: technically right
I am probably the wrong one to ask--not being a techie, I know what I read in the newspapers (i.e. next to nothing).

As MeanWestTexan said above, it involved cell phone towers and did not actively seek out aircraft. It didn't send out any signals, the way you see in movies, etc. In that sense, "radar" is a misnomer for the device. Anyway, here is a site with some of the news stories at the time: TAMARA PASSIVE RADAR.

86 posted on 04/22/2008 1:15:23 PM PDT by ishmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
The F-117 has been detectable by low band search radar since day one.

Yes, I was aware that the Stealth was never completely invisible to detection. "Perfect invisibility" was always a media exaggeration.

87 posted on 04/22/2008 1:17:35 PM PDT by ishmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ishmac
"Perfect invisibility" was always a media exaggeration.

Yes. That way, should one be shot down, the media can feign "surprise" or "betrayal" as needed in their Op Eds.

88 posted on 04/22/2008 1:31:40 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
The F-117 has been detectable by low band search radar since day one.

It's been detectable by any band radar since day one. It's just a matter of how far away from the radar it is detectable.

The Serb radar could paint an F-117 from at most 20 Km away. The F-117s used the same ingress path day after day, so the Serbs knew where to look. Spys outside of Aviano noted the takeoff times of F-117s so the Serbs knew when to look.

Vietnam all over again.

89 posted on 04/22/2008 1:32:42 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Did it have any dog-fighting capability whatsoever?

Not that I've ever heard of and you have a ligitimate question, I believe it should have had an "A" designation.

90 posted on 04/22/2008 1:36:22 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ishmac

The passive Kolchuga detection system is interesting:

http://www.rense.com/general73/detect.htm


91 posted on 04/22/2008 1:46:17 PM PDT by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg
The short shelf life of the F-117 does make me appreciate the B-52

First flight of the F-117 was in 1981, and was operational in 1983. With these last four retiring in 2008, that's a 25 year run. Not a record setter by any means, but seeing as there was only one run of A models, that's not too bad.

92 posted on 04/22/2008 1:51:51 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; NonValueAdded
Lockheed Martin F-117 Nighthawk: Why F? and Why 117?

The Nighthawk's logical designation should have been A-11A.

93 posted on 04/22/2008 1:56:58 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Thanks for the link, Yo-Yo, that makes sense to me.


94 posted on 04/22/2008 2:06:00 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why did it have an “F” designator, rather than an “A” designator? It wasn’t really a fighter.


95 posted on 04/22/2008 2:25:57 PM PDT by tarawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarawa; Yo-Yo

A link supplied by Yo-Yo at post #93 gives some thought on that.


96 posted on 04/22/2008 2:34:16 PM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
As Fischer indicated, we need at least 400 more of the F-22s, and we need to stop downsizing the stealth bomb-delivery capability, since we actually need more air superiority air craft due to the increasingly severe degradation of the F-15 due to deterioration and age. It is functionally obsolete in a number of theaters, and will be likely totally outmatched against the best of our enemies.

We just don't have enough F-22s to squander on bombing runs. What a waste.

97 posted on 04/22/2008 2:36:31 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Be Free
Wow, I’m getting old! I remember when the shroud of secrecy was first lifted.

I had corner office with floor-to-ceiling windows that was right along the flight approach to Dobbins Air Force Base in Marietta, GA. One of, if not the first air-show to showcase the F-117 was held there. I was on an afternoon conference call when this thing flew right by my office. I was speechless and spell-bound. What an awesome sight!

And now, to see them being retired! Hope to see one in the Smithsonian someday.


Shame to retire it, I mean it still runs and flies. I remember seeing my first F-117 in 1990 and I still have the 1990 Latrobe, PA air show poster still up on my wall in my room. Every year, until now, the F-117 was a feature at the Wings Over Pittsburgh air show, it will be weird not seeing it there. Everytime, they've had guards around it armed with M-16's and M4 carbines, I'd like to get a closer look but the thought of .223 Remington slugs flying through my body isn't a good one. B-D
98 posted on 04/22/2008 2:41:17 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Is Barak HUSSEIN Obama the Anti-Christ? "Barak Ho-Tep!! Barak Ho-Tep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I believe it should have had an "A" designation.

Agreed.

99 posted on 04/22/2008 3:05:05 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: F-117A

Priceless!!!

You are not going under the radar either...I’ll make your RCS as big as a B-52!!!

hehehe


100 posted on 04/22/2008 5:50:13 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson