I see all Jewish conflicts relating back to their refusal to accept Christ as their Messiah. Period.
And some writers (Jews and non-Jews) use such sweeping generalizations as to be easily dismissed.
Ping!
[Judea and Samaria must be abandoned, Jerusalem divided, and the refugees compensated, with some of them allowed returning to Israel. Thats not really a peace plan, but an odd demand for capitulation of a victorious power to the defeated aggressors.]
This is what is so unbeievabley weird about this whole peace for land nonsense. How often in history has the victor had to make concessions to the defeated aggressors which would almost certainly result in the ultimate destruction of the victorious nation or people-group? I guess it just doesn’t pay to win wars in defense of one’s sovereign territory. This is really bizarro-world. So “to the victor go the spoils” must seem a little archaic to GW, Condi and the folks at foggy bottom.
What peace?
Terrorists are firing missiles into Israel on an almost daily basis.