1 posted on
04/21/2008 11:33:59 PM PDT by
Red Steel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Red Steel
So Hamas wants Jerusalem and nonrecognition of Israel. In other words, the right to continue war against an illegitimate Jewish state.
3 posted on
04/21/2008 11:37:05 PM PDT by
TheThinker
(Capitalism is the natural result of a democratic government.)
To: Red Steel
“We accept a state on the June 4 line with Jerusalem as capital, real sovereignty and full right of return for refugees but without recognising Israel,” Meshaal said.
Wow. Carter sure is a gifted negotiator. Thats the same demands Hamas has always made. Mission Accomplished by peace maker Jimmah. By all means, give the man another Nobel prize.
4 posted on
04/21/2008 11:49:28 PM PDT by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Red Steel
Sometimes I just dont understand these terrorist organizations. Hamas could of slapped us in the face by just saying, we want peace so we will recognize Israel. Carter would go home triumphantly smirking from ear to ear saying, see what a little negotiations can do. The Media would have a feeding frenzy over it.
Needless to say Hamas can say anything it want it doesnt mean they will honor it.
5 posted on
04/21/2008 11:51:21 PM PDT by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
To: Red Steel
I want to know who paid for this little cross country terrorist papalooza?
I think he is just campaigning for the “Peace Prize”... on the American dime.
6 posted on
04/21/2008 11:53:18 PM PDT by
BigFinn
(islam IS what Islam DOES.)
To: Red Steel
"We accept a state on the June 4 line with Jerusalem as capital, real sovereignty and full right of return for refugees but without recognizing Israel," Meshaal said." Nothing less than declaration of intent to war as soon as they figure they have all their pieces in place.
If Israel up and left all the land for them they still would not rest or be satisfied until they covered and claimed the whole planet and every last Jew was dead.
This is their ideology, their holy mission, their sacred duty, their highest calling.
8 posted on
04/22/2008 12:06:15 AM PDT by
freedom9
(What is the Egyptian sea?)
To: Red Steel
A wonderful farce. Carter the arrogant non peace maker,
hero of the euro trash. Is he an appeaser or traitor?
Certainly a hero of the global left.
9 posted on
04/22/2008 12:06:55 AM PDT by
ChiMark
To: Red Steel
“I did the best I could on that,” Carter said of his failure to persuade
Ladies and Gentlemen, proof positive that history repeats
he also did the best that he could and failed with the communists.
that should be hammered into his tombstone...
11 posted on
04/22/2008 12:22:00 AM PDT by
Irishguy
(How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
To: Red Steel
Three decades later, same deal. Gosh, with negotiation like that, someone could one day become president!
Tip: Next time, don’t meet with them unless they’ll publicly declare recognition of Israel, Mr. Carter. Otherwise, well, gosh, you look like the idiot you are.
12 posted on
04/22/2008 12:23:26 AM PDT by
kingu
(Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
To: Red Steel
Is Jimmy Carter planning a commemoration of the 70th anniversary of Munich?
13 posted on
04/22/2008 12:30:47 AM PDT by
Nextrush
(MCCAIN, OBAMA, CLINTON......WHAT A CHOICE?)
To: Red Steel
This is nothing new.
No wonder they summoned Carter to “negotiate” with.
14 posted on
04/22/2008 12:30:54 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(Vote for McCain but trust in the Lord)
To: Red Steel
"Hamas has said it is ready to accept a Palestinian state better locations within the 1967 borders to launch Alah-Kazam missles from but and still "will not recognise Israel". Wow, what a deal. Thanks Jimmah Cahter, you're such a negotiator. Now go burn in hell with your god, allah.
To: Red Steel
What "Jimmah" really wants is to build a wall around Israel:

21 posted on
04/22/2008 1:56:45 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: Red Steel
AwWWWWW, Hamas will accept the 1967 borders for TEN WHOLE YEARS.
Isn't that just peachy?
22 posted on
04/22/2008 2:17:12 AM PDT by
Cheapskate
(Still backing Hunter"I refuse to be fitted with collar and chain, and given a pat on the back")
To: Red Steel
1982 borders or Israel gets bigger! Final offer.
23 posted on
04/22/2008 3:55:13 AM PDT by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Red Steel
Sure, reward the terrorists with a bunch of land.
Who wouldn’t accept those boundaries when it means your side gets back tonnes of territory.
How about we talk with them after they make life better in the places they already control ?!?
To: SJackson; Salem; Alouette; SunkenCiv
“Hamas ready to accept Israel’s 1967 borders”
Uh-huh. And Santa’s sled is pulled by six purple hippos.
27 posted on
04/22/2008 4:55:40 AM PDT by
Convert from ECUSA
("Typical 'bitter' 'White Male" whose vote the Dems now desperately want so bad - HA!)
To: Red Steel
In 1967, or at any time before or after, were they ready to accept the 1967 borders?
28 posted on
04/22/2008 4:57:50 AM PDT by
iowamark
To: Red Steel
I think Israel should just go ahead and an take the rest of the land and, when these terrorists claim Israel has waged war on them, Israel should just ask, “Who?”, as according to these terrorists Israel does not exist and therefore could not possibly attack them.
31 posted on
04/22/2008 6:14:53 AM PDT by
CodeToad
To: Red Steel
Dhimmmi Jhimmi is the queen of clubs in my 1st deck of domestic enemies playing cards.
33 posted on
04/22/2008 6:45:16 AM PDT by
PGalt
To: Red Steel
Translation: “As usual, we’ll take more land and money, but we won’t give anything in return. Cough it up, Jimmy, so we can get on to the next stage of the Intifada.”
34 posted on
04/22/2008 7:57:02 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson