Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
Oh, I looked up that last reference.

Analysis

Nature Reviews Genetics 8, 803-813 (October 2007) | doi:10.1038/nrg2192

The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes

Michael Lynch1  About the author

Although numerous investigators assume that the global features of genetic networks are moulded by natural selection, there has been no formal demonstration of the adaptive origin of any genetic network. This Analysis shows that many of the qualitative features of known transcriptional networks can arise readily through the non-adaptive processes of genetic drift, mutation and recombination, raising questions about whether natural selection is necessary or even sufficient for the origin of many aspects of gene-network topologies. The widespread reliance on computational procedures that are devoid of population-genetic details to generate hypotheses for the evolution of network configurations seems to be unjustified.

I think "Nature Reviews Genetics" is peer-reviewed. And I guess analysis is science.

288 posted on 04/24/2008 5:42:10 AM PDT by AndrewC (You should go see "Expelled")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

Okay, it’s peer reviewed. Now we wait for the results to be reproduced, and the results of whatever new research comes from the questions raised. Got popcorn?


289 posted on 04/24/2008 5:45:44 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson