Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephen Hawking: Alien but primitive life likely
AP ^ | Apr 21 | SETH BORENSTEIN

Posted on 04/21/2008 5:59:57 PM PDT by Aristotelian

WASHINGTON - Famed astrophysicist Stephen Hawking has been thinking a lot about the cosmic question, "Are we alone?" The answer is probably not, he says.

If there is life elsewhere in the universe, Hawking asks why haven't we stumbled onto some alien broadcasts in space, maybe something like "alien quiz shows?"

Hawking's comments were part of a lecture at George Washington University on Monday in honor of NASA's 50th anniversary. He theorized that there are possible answers to whether there is extraterrestrial life.

One option is that there likely isn't life elsewhere. Or maybe there is intelligent life elsewhere, but when it gets smart enough to send signals into space, it also is smart enough to make destructive nuclear weapons.

Hawking said he prefers the third option:

"Primitive life is very common and intelligent life is fairly rare," he then quickly added: "Some would say it has yet to occur on earth."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: HerrBlucher
Yes, the chance of humans evolving on other planets is small.

But the chance of any intelligent life is there. The number of planets out there is too much to comprehend and that is just the detectable universe. We don't know how old it is or how far it goes past what is detectable.

We will most likely never know just because of the vastness of the universe and rarity of life. Even if teleportation was possible by us or other lifeforms, simply finding a planet with life would be unlikely.

We are more likely to be visited by intelligent life than us visiting them. But both are almost impossible.

41 posted on 04/21/2008 7:12:45 PM PDT by varyouga ("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Famed astrophysicist Stephen Hawking has been thinking a lot about the cosmic question, "Are we alone?" The answer is probably not, he says.

I agree.

"Primitive life is very common and intelligent life is fairly rare,"

Rare yes, but I also believe other very intelligent life exists outside earth. Like diamonds on earth are rare, but it's there.

42 posted on 04/21/2008 7:17:00 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

I envy that man his mind. What a gift. His being an atheist though.......


43 posted on 04/21/2008 7:17:25 PM PDT by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
"I fear some physicist will accidentally stumble upon a way of inducing a microscopically small black hole. It will be all over for us within a fraction of a second. You won't feel a thing.

Ironically, another scientist will deduce that all black holes had to have been induced by intelligent life, each of which was wiped out by the black hole that they induced. But his discovery will come too late to stop our physicist from developing the black hole that will wipe out ours.

44 posted on 04/21/2008 7:18:10 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Yes there is the time problem: We’ve been broadcasting some signals to the nearby stars for a hundred years or so, but how long will we continue? Will humanity last another 10,000 years? Who knows.

Not only is there a time problem, but because of the big bang echo...the ‘humm of the universe”...signals that have emitted from planet earth over the past hundred years or so will quickly,due to the inverse square law, become muddled and indistinguishable from the white noise of the universe. Also, the radio signature of planet earth has drastically diminished in recent years due to more efficient signal transmission (directed microwaves, fiberoptic networks)

Thus far, signals from planet earth have traveled past just a very few stars (maybe in the 100’s).

But with hundreds of billions of stars in a typical galaxy, and with the hundreds of billions of galaxies in the known universe, I can’t help but believe (yes, believe...a matter of faith) that there is lots of life out in the universe...and that our chances of ever learning about that live out there is very, very small.


45 posted on 04/21/2008 7:21:31 PM PDT by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Maybe the descendants of Adam and Eve where the pair didn't take a bite of forbidden fruit?

Ahhhh, the parallel universe' theory.

46 posted on 04/21/2008 7:21:39 PM PDT by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kellyrae
Wusses don't want to accept repsonsibility for being old and wise.... :)

I'm so old, when I totter around the house, folks get smart and go outdoors where the air is fresh.

I'm ready to take charge of the universe. I'm just too tired. I need a nap.

/johnny/

47 posted on 04/21/2008 7:22:03 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Rastus
I once thought of writing a short story were the explorers found another planet that knew of Christ. I wonder if there are any good stories out there like that.

Philip Jose Farmer wrote a book called Jesus on Mars. It's been a while since I read it, but I seem to remember it was interesting.

48 posted on 04/21/2008 7:23:46 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: varyouga
We are more likely to be visited by intelligent life than us visiting them. But both are almost impossible.

Agreed. And by the same logic, the existence of human beings is almost impossible......but here we are. I feel so special......:)

49 posted on 04/21/2008 7:26:43 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (So often times it happens that we live our lives in chains and we never even know we have the key)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Maybe a physicist living inside a black hole will discover how to create an inverse black hole. Hopefully his notes will survive the big bang. Maybe there's a star formation already out there in the perfect shape of the physicist's handwriting.
50 posted on 04/21/2008 7:28:30 PM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

Fortunately for us, black holes get smaller by giving off Hawking Radiation (yes, as in Stephen Hawking) so a black hole that small would evaporate almost instantly... we did the math in my cosmology class last week. Nothing to worry about, unless we can think of way of inducing non-microscopic black holes, but those even generally require astounding amounts of mass. For example, if the sun were to collapse into a black hole (which is impossible, since it doesn’t contain enough mass, we did those calculations in cosmology class as well) its event horizon would only be about 2997 meters (roughly 1.5 miles) across. Even if the entire earth was collapsed into a black hole, its event horizon would only be about 8.8 millimeters across - less than the height of two lines of text here on FR.


51 posted on 04/21/2008 7:39:24 PM PDT by Hyzenthlay (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
It's not a matter of being "satisfied". The objective, irrefutable fact is that no one knows the numbers to the equation that would determine probability.

No one even knows the first number that's needed: the size of the Universe. There are only good guesses as to the size of the observable universe, which is not "The Universe" as a whole.

And - not to say you care what I think about you - I'd never, ever use the "Tornado/Junkyard" statement with someone whose respect I wanted. Not only is it a flawed "argument", it's actually dumb.

52 posted on 04/21/2008 7:45:09 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

If he is so smart, he should be thinking about more important things like making gasoline free.


53 posted on 04/21/2008 8:07:30 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
If human beings evolved by chance via natural selection, and that chance was beyond 1 x 10 to the 65th power, I don’t care how big and old the universe is and how many stars and planets are out there, there is likely NO other life out there.

I think the likely hood of life occurring as a result of random combination is far less likely that that figure.

Consider that there are 20 standard amino acids found in biological systems. Even the smallest of proteins consist of more than 100 amino acids chained in a particular sequence. So even for a relatively small protein, the odds are less than 1 in 10^130.

To put that number in perspective, it is more than the total number of elementary particles in the universe times a billion billion billion. That's the odds of producing just one small protein molecule. A very primitive cell would require many other such proteins and larger, and they would all have to come together at the same time in the same place.

So when people use the argument, "The universe is so vast, there must be thousands of planets with life on them," they have no clue how small the universe is compared to the odds required.

No one. Absolutely no one can explain how life came to be, except by God.

54 posted on 04/21/2008 8:12:44 PM PDT by pjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pjd; Psycho_Bunny

Thanks pjd, I will be using your revised number in the coming wars that “Expelled” is spawning.


55 posted on 04/21/2008 8:19:20 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (So often times it happens that we live our lives in chains and we never even know we have the key)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher

That only makes 30 or 50 unknowable assumptions.


56 posted on 04/21/2008 8:27:55 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC; UnChained; rbg81

Thanks. I’ll check those out.


57 posted on 04/21/2008 9:31:26 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
I've long thought that the greatest evidence for life elsewhere, is the incredibly low intelligence of people on Earth.

Hobbes once speculated to Calvin,

"The best evidence for intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is that it hasn't tried to contact us."

58 posted on 04/21/2008 9:45:58 PM PDT by Erasmus (Old Principals never die; they just lose their faculties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Re: "Primitive life is very common and intelligent life is fairly rare," he then quickly added: "Some would say it has yet to occur on earth."

Stephen is right... if he means the Liberal Democrats!

59 posted on 04/21/2008 10:19:30 PM PDT by Bender2 ("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

>>I want the first words to come from outer space to be: “Have you heard of Jesus Christ?”<<

Followed by the inevitable Mohammedan riots.


60 posted on 04/22/2008 5:01:48 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1 - Take no prisoners))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson