Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr; aruanan

Remember - when photoelectric cells were discovered, they claimed that the world’s energy needs would be met by that, too. “The only limit is the amount of sunshine we get! And we can use batteries for the cloudy days!”

I’m a natural skeptic. I realize that there’s more to this than meets the eye. Implementation may be difficult on a wide scale. Until I see actual details on fuel production per acre dedicated to a) processing facilities and b) biomass generating land (i.e. farmland) I won’t buy the hype.


59 posted on 04/21/2008 3:55:18 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: bolobaby
I’m a natural skeptic. I realize that there’s more to this than meets the eye. Implementation may be difficult on a wide scale. Until I see actual details on fuel production per acre dedicated to a) processing facilities and b) biomass generating land (i.e. farmland) I won’t buy the hype.

What I would like to know is what the oil equivalent would be if all the biomass generated from all the arable land in the world were able to be converted to hydrocarbon fuel. What percentage of current oil, gas, coal, and natural gas production would it be?
65 posted on 04/21/2008 5:05:37 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson