Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blowfish

No, but they do produce methane, which IS a hydrocarbon....

It does not strain credibility to think that engineered bacteria (maybe starting from the ones in cows that produce methane) could possibly produce some other type of hydrocarbon.


22 posted on 04/21/2008 1:35:15 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: clee1
No, it is *theoretically possible* that a bacteria (or other microorganism) could be found that converted specific natural materials to larger hydrocarbons. Note that the bacterial production of methane you cite is quite specific to methane and would not lend itself to larger molecules.

This has been a subject of active research for a long time.

37 posted on 04/21/2008 2:01:38 PM PDT by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson