Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There's real danger to Obama in a cry of 'snob'
The Guardian ^ | April 20th, 2008 | Michael Crowley

Posted on 04/20/2008 11:01:51 AM PDT by The_Republican

Polls show Clinton holding a stubborn lead over Obama and, if she wins, she will have staved off political death one more time. Yet if Clinton wins by a narrow margin - even after an unusually bad stretch for Obama, including his foolish observation about 'bitter' small-town voters and a horrendous debate on Wednesday - her victory will be underwhelming.

In the next two primaries, on 6 May, she trails badly in one (North Carolina) and has surrendered a one-time lead in another (Indiana). Even some Clintonites say they will pressure her to drop out should she lose both those states. And one of her prominent (unnamed) supporters recently estimated to the Politico newspaper that she only has a 10 per cent chance at the nomination.

For a fleeting moment recently, it did seem that Clinton might stand a chance, when controversy exploded over Obama's incendiary pastor, Jeremiah Wright. But Obama's skilful address on race, coupled with the media frenzy around Clinton's foolish exaggeration of 'sniper fire' in Tuzla, slammed that door.

Democrats such as Dean quite reasonably wonder whether their party has become like a family that spends millions in legal battles over an inheritance, only to find there's nothing left at the end. Though in this case the inheritance lost is nothing less than the presidency.

For as Clinton and Obama peck away at one another over honesty, patriotism and race and the like, John McCain is quietly resting, raising money, staging gauzy 'biography' events and laying out campaign positions to little criticism from a distracted left. And the Republicans are laying the groundwork for the same cynical but deadly brand of politics that has kept them in the White House for eight years.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; elitists; obama; pa2008; snob; snobama; sob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Some Edits. GOP certainly have something to work with courtesy of Democrat mud-slinging. HOWEVER, it still disturbing that Mac has not pulled a 5-10 lead. For all practical purposes polls are tied.

Once Dems do settle on a nominee, there would be natural bump in their favor as previously analyzed in other articles. McCain would have to overcome that. Sooner he gets going better his chances would be to erase that lead.

If after accusing each other of being Terrorist Sympathizers, Dems can still tie McCain in polls, then that to me is scary.

1 posted on 04/20/2008 11:01:51 AM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Yes. McCain is a big-time loser. That is scary, regardless of how the race comes out, whether he wins or loses.

The Republican Party leadership who set this up so one of their favored candidates, Giuliani or McCain, would win the nomination have a lot to answer for. In this critical race that may decide the future of our country, the last thing we need is a weak, liberal, corrupt, ill, base-kicking, unpopular candidate.


2 posted on 04/20/2008 11:07:52 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

I think Mac should continue to sit this out for now. I really like the campaign strategy he’s laid out that relies on a “federalized” approach. He should also hold off on the big ads until the last moment, regardless of the nominee. The Dems come in with a 2-1 advantage in money this time. Let them spend it while Mac gets free coverage, youtube, blogs, etc...Main problem he has is Judas’ within the party who suffer from McCain Derangement Syndrome. They need to be silenced or Obamabots will take over.


3 posted on 04/20/2008 11:09:12 AM PDT by Ilya Mourometz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Typical Guardian claptrap.

One recurring feature of recent presidential campaigns has been the disgraceful effort of the Republican party to compensate for its unpopular positions on major issues, from health care to Iraq, by impugning the character of the Democratic presidential nominee. Liberals have made this complaint for some time, but I lent it new credence after listening to a senior figure in the Bush political machine. 'You guys never get it,' he said to a group of journalists who'd been debating the politics of some newsworthy issue. 'People don't vote on issues. They vote on character.'

Who said this?

Republicans weigh BOTH. BTW is the Dems who raised these questions about Obama. McCain has avoided going there.

4 posted on 04/20/2008 11:18:11 AM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
HOWEVER, it still disturbing that Mac has not pulled a 5-10 lead

Why is that disturbing? He is not well liked in his party and not well like in the other party.

The majority of the people who are going to vote for him are the centrists who never know what they want and don't participate in polling as much as people who identify with one of the parties.
5 posted on 04/20/2008 11:32:28 AM PDT by elizabetty (I vote for four years without a president if these three clowns are the choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty

Well its disturbing because it doesn’t matter you like him or not, the other side just accused each other of being TERRORIST SYPMATHIZERS! When was the last time something like that happenned on National TV between two Presidential Candidates? You would think they would both drop to low teens after that in the polls.


6 posted on 04/20/2008 11:40:19 AM PDT by The_Republican (Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Raised in foreign countries and then at a private in school in Hawaii. Babied and pampered his entire life — all the while being told how “special” he is — no wonder he's not much of an American.
7 posted on 04/20/2008 1:08:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

8 posted on 04/20/2008 1:10:15 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Obama: Same Old Crap. Just Slightly Darker Brown.


9 posted on 04/20/2008 1:12:44 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Heheheheheheheh!


10 posted on 04/20/2008 1:19:35 PM PDT by The_Republican (Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

11 posted on 04/20/2008 1:30:48 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Everytime McCain reaches out to conservatives, conservatives get poked in the eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

“Republicans are laying the groundwork for the same cynical but deadly brand of politics that has kept them in the White House...”

LOL...if only this were so! It is McCain’s dumb luck that the Dems have to choose between two Marxists, with very shady connections in their past. Pointing this out to the electorate will be decried by their fellow Leftists in the msm, but that should not deter the GOP from exposing the truth. We’ll see if “Gentleman John” has the courage to do it.


12 posted on 04/20/2008 1:53:25 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Amazingly, one poll taken just before the election showed that pro-Bush voters cared more about 'character and strength of leadership [than] how a candidate stands on the issues' by a nearly three-to-one margin. Is it any wonder American politics is the subject of ridicule and derision around the world?

[...]

In every case, the GOP message to America was the same: the Democratic candidate is too fancy to understand your world. He looks down on you. He is a product of a coastal elite establishment that derides real Americans.

They really don't even realize they are doing it, do they?

There problem isn't that it's not true, it's that it keeps them from winning elections. The thing they don't seem to understand is that a person doesn't need a college to detect contempt coming from someone with one.

13 posted on 04/20/2008 2:39:04 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

I don’t care if the President is a snob as long as he’s a conservative snob.


14 posted on 04/20/2008 2:51:16 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Until we take back our education system from the Democrats/socialists, we are doomed to be electing democrats and socialists.

Why do conservatives put their kids in public schools to be taught a socialist curriculum by socialists ?


15 posted on 04/20/2008 2:52:00 PM PDT by nicola_tesla ("Life is Tough... It's Worse When You're Stupid".... John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicola_tesla
Why do conservatives put their kids in public schools to be taught a socialist curriculum by socialists ?

Well, Nikki, let me tell you about that.

Not all public schools are that way. Some are, but not all.

Some kids are weak minded or poorly raised and might believe
the crap that is taught there. I pity them. But they aren't my problem.

I have publicly educated kids and they are not socialists.

You can take that theory and cram it.

16 posted on 04/20/2008 2:56:34 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
You can take that theory and cram it.

Given the huge popularity of OBH's hard-left socialism with the under-30 crowd, do you think that public education's decades of socialist indoctrination isn't responsible for at least some of that?

17 posted on 04/20/2008 3:03:37 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7; Eaker
do you think that public education's decades of socialist indoctrination isn't responsible for at least some of that?

I'm sure it is.

But proper parenting can and does immunize kids to a great
degree against the garbage in the public school agenda.

There may well be a ton-and-a-half of pro-gay, pro-socialism, anti-gun,
hate-America bullshit being pushed in public schools.

My kids don't believe it, they move on past it.

Parenting and example is stronger than propaganda.

18 posted on 04/20/2008 3:15:35 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

This article says it all. It is the reason that Democrats seem to lose. But, not because of any dirth tricks by Republicans - and not because the electorate agrees with the Democratic issues either. It’s because the Democrats are so out of touch in their ivory towers, they do not understand average Americans and our value system.

The Dems lose because they mock our values, propose socialism in the name of being do-gooders, and nominate candidates who are so far left that they fall off the beach in California.


19 posted on 04/20/2008 4:38:34 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

LOL! Well Said.


20 posted on 04/20/2008 4:41:29 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson